[Rebel_Ace]

You post the same things from the same sources OVER AND OVER AND OVER, using the name "DARWIN" as a prejorative, whether the topic is biology or astronomy or geology.

It was YOU I was describing, as you, my good man, are OBSESSED with this. I mean that in the literal, dictionary sense of the word as posted.

You simply preach to the converted, ignore or toss off legitimate points of contention with grade school "comebacks", all the while each and every one of these threads "devolves" into tit for tat name calling.

Only someone OBSESSED would continue to do this OVER AND OVER and somehow, expect a different result.

[GodGunsGuts]

Actually, I'm posting what I believe in...it is your OBSESSIVE Temple of Darwin fanatics that clutter up my threads with your vile comments, and then whine and whimper when you encounter the slightest resistance. If you have a problem with the Christian Right, you are free to avoid these threads. But you can't, because you and your fellow evo coreligionists are obsessed with stifling all opposition.

[GourmetDan]

"You simply preach to the converted, ignore or toss off legitimate points of contention with grade school "comebacks", all the while each and every one of these threads "devolves" into tit for tat name calling."

The only substantive claim in your post is that 'legitimate points of contention' are ignored. Let's see if that single, solitary, substantive claim is accurate.

What 'legitimate points of contention' do you refer to?