The most transparent administration in history has to be sued to release their visitors list.
Hypocrisy Hypocrisy Hypocrisy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Titus-Maximus
With all the technology in “our” house, there really is no need to visit our White House.
2 posted on
09/04/2009 8:23:44 AM PDT by
edcoil
(If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
To: Titus-Maximus
“Information on visitors in the first eight months of his administration will remain secret unless you know which names to ask for.”
Soros.
3 posted on
09/04/2009 8:24:51 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(I remember Jack Kennedy... Jack Kennedy was a President of mine.. and Teddy, you're no Jack Kennedy!)
To: Titus-Maximus
I wonder what he’s hiding this time???
To: Titus-Maximus
B-HO, go lie to someone else. I have had my fill of Barry Soetoro for a lifetime!
7 posted on
09/04/2009 8:27:47 AM PDT by
SpeedRacer
(Where's your records, B-HO? What are you hiding?)
To: Titus-Maximus
He’s only doing it because of that and the fact that when we find out just who is visiting 1600 on a regular basis it will add to our fear and outrage.
Zero & his posse seem to enjoy starting a fire and throwing gas on it.
8 posted on
09/04/2009 8:29:28 AM PDT by
Califreak
(If it's Astroturf, why are you trying to mow it?(sign seen at a town hall meeting))
This is such a joke. It’s non-compliant compliance. They’re going to overwhelm anyone looking for names by releasing tens of thousands of names each month, including every tour visitor to the white house. No one cares about them. The white house says it WILL NOT release the names of “purely personal” visitors or names they deem to be sensitive to national security. The WHITE HOUSE will still decide what is released. I would guess that means Rev. Wright could visit every week and never be named. What a sham.
9 posted on
09/04/2009 8:29:34 AM PDT by
Honcho Bongs
(Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. - Churchill)
To: Titus-Maximus
It says MOST visitors...so he can still hide who he wants.
To: Titus-Maximus
Anyone wanna bet:
a) they'll be heavily redacted
or
b) there will be two sets of books: one for the "public" and another for "national security" reasons?
To: Titus-Maximus
What a bunch of crap this is. Transparency? Not at all.
Friends and family of the Pres. and VP will NOT be released.
We haven’t forgotten whose on this list and who is currently advising Obama, have we?
No names of those pre-Sept. 15...would have been nice to know those who had Barry’s ear in light of all the nonsense shoved through since January.
No names of those who would be meeting with Obama regarding sensitive issues...very subjective.
All in all, there is no transparency and this is more of the same from this administration.
14 posted on
09/04/2009 8:33:19 AM PDT by
milford421
(U.N. OUT OF U.S.)
To: Titus-Maximus
The Obama administration says it will release names of most visitors to the White House, starting at the end of this year. Information on visitors in the first eight months of his administration will remain secret unless you know which names to ask for. LMAO this is a JOKE....right? Name avowed communists and terrorist and chicago mob rulers and we are in like Flynn.
To: Titus-Maximus
“..most visitors to the White House”
Why even bother if you can cherry pick out the names you do not want the public to see anyway...............
17 posted on
09/04/2009 8:35:12 AM PDT by
blueyon
(It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
To: Titus-Maximus
I’ll bet a few savvy people would know which names to ask about. I hope they do, then share with Rush, Hannity, Beck, etc.
18 posted on
09/04/2009 8:35:14 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(Impeach Barak "let them eat cake" Obama, while there's still something of our Republic to save.)
To: Titus-Maximus
As well as name CEO’s of all the payoffs of WallStreet/Healthcare that are on the take with the WH.
To: Titus-Maximus
The Obama administration says it will release names of most visitors to the White House, starting at the end of this year. Which means absolutely nothing. Most visitors? Is there a single living person who thinks they'd release the name of a single visitor that might raise awkward questions for the White House?
20 posted on
09/04/2009 8:37:24 AM PDT by
Will88
To: Titus-Maximus
“most” visitors? Love that transparency!
21 posted on
09/04/2009 8:37:44 AM PDT by
newfreep
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: Titus-Maximus
Release the names of most visitors at the end of the year, huh?
More obfuscation and delay.
22 posted on
09/04/2009 8:40:59 AM PDT by
RobinOfKingston
(Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
To: Titus-Maximus
Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Chairman Mao, Che Guevara, Margaret Sanger, Saul Alinsky, Joseph Goebbels, Josef Mengele and a host of other prominent America haters.
24 posted on
09/04/2009 8:48:33 AM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(Kennedy complained at 2:55 am to the hotel owner that he had been awoken by a noisy party.)
To: Titus-Maximus
This IS the most transparent administration in history. I see right through his LIES.
25 posted on
09/04/2009 8:52:53 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Kennedycare?Recall that "Animal Farm" begins with a Socialist Revolution to honor Big Major's legacy)
To: Titus-Maximus
And only visits after Sept. 15, 2009, will be revealed Shades of John F. Kerry "signing" his 180 form.
26 posted on
09/04/2009 8:54:45 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Kennedycare?Recall that "Animal Farm" begins with a Socialist Revolution to honor Big Major's legacy)
To: Titus-Maximus
Way to point an arrow at the records that absolutely must be seen now. The Obama folks are daring folks to redouble efforts to get this information released.
28 posted on
09/04/2009 8:58:35 AM PDT by
dalight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson