Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now Muslims Know How Michael Phelps Feels
Townhall.com ^ | August 24, 2009 | Rachel Marsden

Posted on 08/24/2009 4:17:56 AM PDT by Kaslin

At the recent World Swimming Championships, officials announced that competitors would soon be banned from using the new record-smashing, limit-testing buoyant high-tech polyurethane bodysuits. I’m sure Michael Phelps and his friends are bummed out. As a former record-setting competitive swimmer who used to shop for tight racing suits in the “infant” apparel section to score an advantage, I can attest to the desire to push the limit with one’s aquatic apparel. So can Muslims, apparently. Bans on their traditional burqas are sweeping Europe, so now they’re making them into “burqinis”, and arguing that since they have an aquatic spin, the attire should be exempt from the rules. A burqini is an outfit now worn by Muslim women in pools, most closely resembling a full tracksuit, with an added head covering or veil.

Italy banned the Islamic headscarf in July 2005, as part of its anti-terrorism package. The penalty for breach was set at 2 years in jail and a $3,200 fine. This week, a northern Italian town of Varallo Sesia banned the burqini from public pools, complete with a $700 fine for violation.

In 2004, France banned the headscarf in state schools, and the country is currently debating a widespread burqa ban in parliamentary committee. The French have seen the burqa take to the water in self-defence, as well. A French convert to Islam was booted from a French swimming pool earlier this month for wearing the jogging suit and veil outfit.

While working as a lifeguard to pay for university, I encountered my fair share of people who believed the pool was a “rules and judgment free zone” in much the same way that thugs in a boxing ring figure it’s impossible to be charged with anything short of murder. There was an Indian man who had to be thrown out of the pool for doing cannonballs off the high board in a giant white diaper contraption with a kirpan (religious sword worn by baptized Sikhs) shoved through its hip. It isn’t always a religious issue: A man with a giant tattoo of his naked wife across his back was offered a complimentary t-shirt to wear in the pool, in response to complaints from horrified mothers. He flipped out and refused to cover up, so he was thrown out.

And there were always signs posted around the pool stating that no street clothes were allowed in the pool, or street shoes on the pool deck, for hygienic reasons. But apparently some Muslims figure the average “street burqa” can be made into the exception. I thought at first that perhaps the word “burqini” was invented by Anglo media to describe what Muslims would just call a sweatsuit – but no, Ahiida Burqini Swimwear is the actual registered and trademarked name. So here’s a thought: If you don’t want people accusing your swimsuit of being a burqa, then don’t explicitly call it that. You can’t have it both ways. It’s either a burqa, or a sweatsuit worn in the water – both of which would be unacceptable for anyone to wear in a swimming pool anyway. Maybe try wearing it in a yoga class. They’re the hippies of the exercise community, so you should start with testing your luck there. Here are some good rules of thumb for lifeguards and other public officials who may end up scratching their heads over this issue: If it’s not in a Speedo catalogue, then it’s not a swimsuit. If it doesn’t show any cleavage, then it’s not a “bikini” or any variation thereof. If it doesn’t resemble anything in the Koran, and if it would be intolerable by Islamists outside of the pool, then it’s not a burqa either.

This isn’t about fashion choices. If it were, I wouldn’t have any moral authority on the matter, given that I spent most of my childhood in sweatsuits with my name stenciled down the side and across the back because my parents apparently felt that I might be in danger of losing their $40 investment. The burqa isn’t about bad fashion exclusively – it’s about what it conveys. Clothes, attire and accessories carry meaning. When I was in grade 5, one girl came up to me in my sweatsuit and said, “You would be really popular if you wore tight jeans, you know.” I responded, “I don’t want to be popular.” Similarly, when someone is at the gym or on the subway with an iPod plugged into their ears, they’re saying, “Go away and leave me alone.” If mere earphones can convey that message, then what does a head-to-toe sheet with a tiny slit over the eyes communicate? I have heard psychologists muse that people who are fat subconsciously choose to be that way to keep other people away. If we’re willing to accept that a layer of blubber on someone conveys isolation, then it ought to be easy to accept that a head-to-toe curtain shutting a woman off from the rest of the world is surely communicating the same.

Perhaps the most logical argument I have heard from those opposed to the burqa ban is that if women in the subservient Islamic culture are no longer allowed to wear the burqa in public, then their husbands will just keep them at home. Great – a fuzzy cultural debate then becomes a very clear case of forcible confinement and criminality. And THAT is something we can actively prosecute without any sort of self-inflicted cultural guilt.

Of course there are always places where the choices – of both dress and conduct towards women – would be viewed as preferable by those who are burqa-bent. No one is stopping them from going there and bodysurfing in all the comfort of their 300 thread count outfit.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: burqa; burqini; islam; muslim; muslimwomen

1 posted on 08/24/2009 4:17:56 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The more we do to resist the Islamonazis the better.

If they don’t like it, let each citizen chant GTFOOMC.


2 posted on 08/24/2009 4:22:35 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (I want all communists to fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I thought Phelps was opposed to these swimsuits.


3 posted on 08/24/2009 4:32:20 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
As a former record-setting competitive swimmer

She also wrongly accused her SFU swim coach of sexual harrassment, and got him fired - it was later overturned, but the damage was done.

And other instances. She's easy on the eyes, but she's a piece of work.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Marsden
4 posted on 08/24/2009 4:55:41 AM PDT by canuck_conservative (Obama - The "Big Owe")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What a well-written article, well done!


5 posted on 08/24/2009 4:56:54 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Apparently Speedo is one of Phelps’ sponsors, and a competitor makes the newest suits, so Michael won his races at the World Championship in Rome without the aid of the “buoyancy” suit.


6 posted on 08/24/2009 5:10:28 AM PDT by maica (Politics is not about facts. it is about what politicians can get people to believe. - Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What fun we're having!
Oops! My ankle just showed there for a moment!
Hope the Taliban aren't watching...

7 posted on 08/24/2009 6:41:34 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("A cultural problem cannot be solved with a political solution." -- Selwyn Duke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
***What fun we're having!
Oops! My ankle just showed there for a moment!****

How dare you! You flash an ankle, a moslem man sees it, gets turned on, and it's all your fault because he can't control his Passions after seeing the ankle! Where is the stones!

8 posted on 08/24/2009 7:49:40 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Tar and feather the sons of bi#ches! Ride them out of town on a rail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

They look like the “Alien of the Week” on Star Trek: Voyager....


9 posted on 08/24/2009 8:29:03 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Personally, I don’t see how these pass ‘form fitting’ definitions, as when wet, well, a definite form is visible, as opposed to the shapeless shifting burqa. That being said, rarely do I go to the pool or other body of water and think that, wow, a few people could use some more clothes. Please, please but a t-shirt over all that. ;-) I find the burqini less offensive than the burqa.


10 posted on 08/24/2009 9:42:54 AM PDT by fortunecookie (Please pray for Anna, age 7, who waits for a new kidney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fortunecookie
The whole thing is just a load of infiltration crap. If they go to the pool wearing that crap, the next demand is that they have separate pool hours so there will be no mixing with males. Then, the next thing will be to have only muslim women attendants; but they all must be escorted by male relatives. Then... and then... It's crap. When orthodox Jews came to this country, they established their own their own bathhouses for their ritual bath. The sky didn't fall.
11 posted on 08/24/2009 12:00:53 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("A cultural problem cannot be solved with a political solution." -- Selwyn Duke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
The whole thing is just a load of infiltration crap. If they go to the pool wearing that crap, the next demand is that they have separate pool hours so there will be no mixing with males.

Deep down I know that's so. Or that we dress in a way so as not to offend anyone on the off chance we are at the same pool.

They should be pleased to have their own bathhouses. Of course, tax dollars may not pay for a private bathhouse...

12 posted on 08/24/2009 1:22:28 PM PDT by fortunecookie (Please pray for Anna, age 7, who waits for a new kidney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson