Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC Takes McCain-Feingold to Court
CQ Politics ^ | 2009-08-19 | Bart Jansen

Posted on 08/22/2009 1:11:10 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

The Republican National Committee is asking a federal court to restore the ability of national parties to raise unlimited amounts of money and to spend it to help elect state-level candidates.

The case focuses on hotly contested governor’s races in New Jersey and Virginia. The 2002 McCain-Feingold campaign financing law (PL 107-155) does not allow national parties to give money directly to state candidates. The RNC wants to change that so it can expressly back the party nominee for governor, advertise and send out mailings on behalf of state or local Republican candidates and make get-out-the-vote calls.

The law also bans the parties from taking unlimited big-dollar contributions from corporations, unions and wealthy donors — a type of donation known as “soft money” — and the RNC wants to reverse that as well.

The case will be heard Aug. 27 by a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and the ruling could be appealed straight to the Supreme Court. An RNC victory would deal a major blow to the landmark campaign finance law named for Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, and open the door to a more prominent role for the national parties in state-level races.

(Excerpt) Read more at cqpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: campaignfinance; elections; feingold; freespeech; lawsuit; mcbama; mccainantigop; mccainfeingold; mccainlegacy; mccaintruthfile; mclame; mcqueeg; mcshame; rino; rnc; steele

1 posted on 08/22/2009 1:11:10 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Thanks, Juan. After you make all of the Mexicans into “Americans”, maybe you can sponsor a bill making it ILLEGAL to vote for conservatives!!


2 posted on 08/22/2009 1:13:42 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

What’s ironic was that McCain’s own pet campaign finance law hindered his ability to raise money for his Presidential bid.


3 posted on 08/22/2009 1:14:50 PM PDT by DanZanRyu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmarie373; Abundy; missanne; Victoria Delsoul; 50mm; stockpirate; Eaker; ducdriver; ChrisInAR; ...

The Juan McCain Truth File.

"I have great respect for Al Gore."
—John McCain, October 2, 2008

FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add  mccaintruthfile.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.)
 
Republican Commissar’s Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless RNC shills who simply want to meet a new overlord.


4 posted on 08/22/2009 1:15:19 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (May God save the American Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

True campaign finance reform: On your taxes give $1 to the National Debt.

S*REW THE POLITICIANS!


5 posted on 08/22/2009 1:18:24 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

That maniac McCain has caused more damage to this nation than any foreign enemy ever has, allowing marxists to rig the electoral process in their favor and handicapping conservatives in their fight to stop them via his unconstutional legislation and then failing to run an effective campaing against a Marxist crypto-muslim dedicated to destroying America

He ought to be locked back up in a tiger cage and he can take his fat dumb blonde daughter with him


6 posted on 08/22/2009 1:20:26 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Hussein Baraka Mook Kebba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Hey McTraitor: RETIRE! He’s another Benedict Arlen Specter.


7 posted on 08/22/2009 1:22:02 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanZanRyu

Very true. And the GOP can no longer afford to be hamstrung after the blatant campaing fraud that Obama pulled off that was never investigated.


8 posted on 08/22/2009 1:23:30 PM PDT by lt.america (wearing my Brooks Brothers shirt proudly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Ahhh, remember how the media luuuved him for CFR in 2002? I mean, CFR was the most important thing since the Constitution!

When his 2008 campaign rolled around, it was totally forgotten.

McCain, you dope.

9 posted on 08/22/2009 1:34:18 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
......McCain, you dope.

Was he a dope or was he a very willing participant?

10 posted on 08/22/2009 1:35:42 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

It’s about effin time!!!!!

This bill should never have become law in the first place, and should have been to court before the ink was dry.


11 posted on 08/22/2009 1:37:10 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; Jim Robinson
Our Founder said it best about McInsane I think:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1601416/posts

Well worth the read.
12 posted on 08/22/2009 1:40:06 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

They could have simply voted no on the legislation in the first place.


13 posted on 08/22/2009 1:41:11 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lt.america
GOP can no longer afford to be hamstrung after the blatant campaing fraud that Obama pulled off that was never investigated.

Something that has always baffled me about McCain-Feingold is that it limited corporations, wealthy, and others from making big money contributions ... but then how did Obama amass some $800 million for his POTUS run, and who were the donors? Certainly $800 mil didn't come from the grassroots .. who did it come from?

I've never seen any satisfying answer to that question, as if the question was ever even asked

14 posted on 08/22/2009 1:42:32 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Well, McCain will live in infamy as long as this law stays on the books. But you have to fault the weak-spined Republicans for giving in to pressure and voting for it.

And you have to fault Bush for signing it, explaining that he knew the Supreme Court would strike it down because it is unconstitutional.

Well, yes, it’s unconstitutional. But SCOTUS doesn’t worry too much about that these days. And Obama will make it worse as soon as he can—also with Republican help, no doubt.


15 posted on 08/22/2009 1:42:34 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

Obama declined government financing, so it didn’t apply to him. He had no obligation to report anything after the election. And now, of course, he owns the Justice Department, so never mind that he got a ton of illegal money and foreign money.


16 posted on 08/22/2009 1:44:11 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Obama declined government financing, so it didn’t apply to him. He had no obligation to report anything after the election.

See, again .. this is not a satisfactory answer .. (not your answer Cicero, but the CFR law itself) .. how can there be two sets of rules for campaigning? One which hogties a candidate who accepts public $$$, and another which doesn't?

If this is the double-standard which CFR was based on, then it was highly flawed legislation from the get-go ... (but we already knew that, of course)

Hope the GOP can bury this abomination once and for all, as well as kick Mr McCain in the a$$ once or twice for good measure

17 posted on 08/22/2009 2:04:15 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
victory would deal a major blow to the landmark campaign finance law named for Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin,

Good!

Maybe the people of AZ will wake up and vote JohnnyMc into retirement.
18 posted on 08/22/2009 2:13:20 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1
This bill should never have become law in the first place

McCain wrote it and Bush signed it.

Neither had the best interest of the American people in mind.

That was just one example of the sad state of affairs on political system is in.
19 posted on 08/22/2009 2:16:19 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Not like it makes a damn bit of difference to me. I gave the last dime of mine the RNC will ever see a decade ago.

Individual candidates and Club for Growth only, thank ya very much.

20 posted on 08/22/2009 2:27:37 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (Will we ever have another President whose lips aren't attached to Goldman Sachs' ass??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Dang! When I first saw that title I hoped that those two were about to be dragged into court for felonious assault on the former Constitution.
21 posted on 08/22/2009 2:49:00 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Here’s what I don’t get. Why can a candidate spend as much of his own money as he wants on his campaign, but I can only donate a limited amount to his opponent?

Or am I mistaken and we are both limited (therefore causing the candidate to use the old loan-the-campaign-money-that-will-never-be-repaid trick)?


22 posted on 08/22/2009 3:01:50 PM PDT by Darth Reardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Was he a dope or was he a very willing participant?

A dope -- for the love of John McCain.

I really don't enough confidence in McCain's intelligence to believe he could be slick enough to pull this off with such cunning. It was all about stroking his immense ego, which the Dems, the media and Pew knew exactly how to do.

This reminded me, though, that McCain's health care reforms pretty much mirrored what the Congressional Republicans are proposing -- buying insurance across state lines, etc. The problem was, he didn't understand it, couldn't explain it, and never bothered to figure out exactly what it was that the Dems were offering (hint, hint -- single payer, John -- over here!).

23 posted on 08/22/2009 3:17:43 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight
I remember hearing on a news program that that had already been debunked, and everyone knew during the campaign that whole $5 a pop donation leading to almost 1 bil was BS. The story went on to say that the RNC knew if McCain won the election that Obama’s campaign fund raising improprieties would be investigated and the fraud would be exposed. In that same vane, they also knew if Obama won, nothing would ever come of it.
24 posted on 08/22/2009 3:35:16 PM PDT by lt.america (wearing my Brooks Brothers shirt proudly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

Not one person, unless I missed it, on this thread praised Michael Steele, RNC Chair for taking this to Court. We have had quite a few Chairs since this went into effect and this is the first one with a backbone to take it to Court.

I applaud Michael Steele for standing up to McCain/Feingold!


25 posted on 08/22/2009 4:01:52 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

“Was he a dope or was he a very willing participant?”

Do you mean “dupe,” as opposed to “dope”? To be duped is to be tricked, whereas a dope is just an idiot.


26 posted on 08/22/2009 4:03:58 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Woohoo! Great news.


27 posted on 08/22/2009 8:45:49 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

The latter explains so much more than the former.


28 posted on 09/04/2009 5:59:47 PM PDT by Grandma Conservative (Quit settling for the lesser of two evils and support conservatives in the primaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

The RNC should sue McCain for fraudulent misrepresentation, monetary damages and demand their 2008 campaign money be refunded.


29 posted on 09/04/2009 6:03:48 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Proud FR Mobster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson