Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Appears Open To Insurance Co-Ops ["Bi-Partisan Consensus" Expected?]
NYTimes ^ | August 16, 2009

Posted on 08/16/2009 2:29:50 PM PDT by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: cliniclinical

Remember, these are the folks who brought us that wonderful Health Management Organization (HMO)! Let’s go back to the days when you paid your doctor yourself!


21 posted on 08/16/2009 2:42:48 PM PDT by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The Pilgrims rejected their co-op system with the death of Gov. Carver, and with the emergence of Gov. Bradford. It is a lesson forgotton:

A search: http://www.startpage.com/do/metasearch.pl

and, John Stossels’ piece on the Plymouth Colony:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=23558


22 posted on 08/16/2009 2:43:44 PM PDT by givemELL (Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
If the "white house" is for it, we'd all better be against it...for it's just another obamalie.

He's a skillful horse trader, for this is what he wanted to begin with...now, he'll just pull a "general motors" on the insurance companies, and guess what? Government Healthcare all over again.

The new mantra should be simply, "KILL THE BILL". We don't want ANY FORM of obamacare...for if HE is behind, you can bet there is a socialist core to it.

He has YET to do anything FOR Americans...he only does things TO Americans.

Don't fall for this crap, he's just re-focusing the argument and pulling his three-card sleight of hand to weasle this thing in the back door.

KILL THE BILL
23 posted on 08/16/2009 2:44:19 PM PDT by FrankR (We are only enslaved to the extent of charity we receive....INCUMBENTS OUT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Nope, no way. Kill the bill, this is just double dealing so they can get any bill passed and add to it as they go.


24 posted on 08/16/2009 2:44:48 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Kill the Bill


25 posted on 08/16/2009 2:46:03 PM PDT by The Wizard (Democrat Party: a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Yeah, I bet Obama’s friends at ACORN with be running these “non-profit” co-ops. After all they are a “non-profit” community organization. In fact, I think “non-profit co-op” sounds more socialistic than “single payer”.
26 posted on 08/16/2009 2:46:13 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Saw this coming! Kill the bill


27 posted on 08/16/2009 2:46:33 PM PDT by timetostand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Those who engage, must elevate the debate to the point where the media cannot distort it as being just "ignorance" (as Katie Couric claimed yesterday). The Gibbs and Axelrod talking points cannot trump the forcefulness and truth of the words of America's Founders on liberty vs. tyranny.

Edmund Burke, before the British Parliament way back in March 1775, observed the colonists' fierce "spirit of liberty." He said:

"In other countries the people . . . judge of an ill principle in government only by an actual grievance; here they anticipate the evil and judge of the pressure of the grievance by the badness of the principle." He said Americans could detect "misgovernment at a distance and sniff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze."

James Madison put it this way, "The freemen of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle. We revere this lesson too much, soo to forget it."

Any Republicans or Democrats who "compromise" for the sake of popularity now on this important principle involving future generations should be recalled at the next election cycle!

This is not about a frivolous question of which provisions are acceptable and which are unacceptable. This is about a power struggle between the principles the founding generation were willing to stake their "lives, property, and sacred honor" for, and those who, throughout the history of civilization have arrogated unto themselves power over other people's lives.

The current "issue" called "health care reform," or its equally obnoxious semantic twin "health insurance reform," is just the invasion of liberty by arrogant elected officials which has finally aroused citizens who, heretofore, ignored the decades-long power grab by those who were supposed to protect "We, the People's" constitutional principles.

Now, citizens are seeing that it is a matter of "principle," not an issue of semantics over wording.

They should not allow their elected representatives to be coopted by "blue dogs" or any other "wolf in sheep's clothing" that would allow what may turn out to be the most important watershed moment in the history of American liberty to be further threatened. Now, Conrad and Sebelius, and others, sensing the voter mood are throwing out "compromise" talk this weekend, all to punt for better position down the road. Seize the moment for the sake of posterity and just say, "no"!

A word from the author of our Declaration of Independence regarding citizens and oppressive government might give some backbone to today's citizens:

"The most effectual means of preventing the perversion of power into tyranny are to illuminate . . . the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits, that they may. . . know ambition under all its shapes, and . . . exert their natural power to defeat its purposes." - Thomas Jefferson

And, for more wisdom from the same source:

" . . . this is a tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second, that second for a third, and so on, till the bulk of the society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sin and suffering. Then begins, indeed, the bellum omnium in omnia, which some philosophers. . . have mistaken it for the natural, instead of the abusive state of man. And the forehorse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follws that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression."- Thomas Jefferson

28 posted on 08/16/2009 2:46:37 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It’s only the camel’s nose under the tent. When the sheeple go for it, the rest will follow.

Has never failed to do so...never, never, never!


29 posted on 08/16/2009 2:47:09 PM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I do hope that the conservatives see through this ploy. Tell your representatives, NO!
30 posted on 08/16/2009 2:47:56 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Cooperative, Collective, public option, it is all the same thing - government run healthcare. This was planned all along as a tactical “concession” but not really ceding anything. KILL THE BILL!


31 posted on 08/16/2009 2:50:34 PM PDT by BIG_CARBON_FOOT_PRINT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

We must not let any part, even the merest, of this thing pass. If anything passes as one of these bills, it will be expanded by amendments to every piece of new legislation that comes through Congress so long as there is a Social Democrat majority. Once enacted it will be “interpreted” to contain the provisions removed to facilitate passage. If anything passes under the health care rubric, the whole thing will be in place after a little while.


32 posted on 08/16/2009 2:51:24 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

NONONONONONONONO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PERIOD!!!


33 posted on 08/16/2009 2:51:54 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

Looks like there has been a back-door deal on the Co-Ops idea between the Republicans and the D-rats with Emanuel and Axelrod still in the driver’s seat doing a small detour to avoid the townhall “bump-in-the-road”


34 posted on 08/16/2009 2:54:30 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
It appears they are just changing the name.

Exactly. This reminds me of politicians who say they are against "same-sex marriage", but are in favor of "civil unions". It's so Orwellian.

35 posted on 08/16/2009 2:57:16 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Kill it all and quit stealing from those that work and giving to those that don’t!!

Either pay for it or lie down and die!


36 posted on 08/16/2009 2:57:28 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Kill the Bill


37 posted on 08/16/2009 2:59:44 PM PDT by LADY J (Change your thoughts and you change your world. - Norman Vincent Peale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Then they need to get a great big ole STOP sign from us.


38 posted on 08/16/2009 3:01:38 PM PDT by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Can anyone give me an example of an insurance co-op?


39 posted on 08/16/2009 3:03:43 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I don't know.. I can't see any conservatives going for this. Maybe the lap-dogs will though...

But the people? lol Nope... It won't take long before people start associating the idea with Fannie and Freddy. In a way, it makes it even easier to envision the disaster this would be.

40 posted on 08/16/2009 3:07:42 PM PDT by freestyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson