Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: SeekAndFind
“They feel they have no voice in Washington, no voice in the political power structure,...”
....and no voice in the MSM.
To: SeekAndFind
Having ones book reviewed in The New York Times meant something up until recently. LOL - The New York Times isn't what it once was... now they "suck more"...
3 posted on
08/15/2009 7:33:02 AM PDT by
GOPJ
("Fishy rumors posters" Check 'em out:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2311664/posts)
To: SeekAndFind
Doesn’t matter. TThe soon to be padlocked and boarded up NYTs, is no longer part of the “Mainstream”, just a fetid cesspool of Liberal Socialist Loserism.
4 posted on
08/15/2009 7:33:30 AM PDT by
DGHoodini
(Iran Azadi!)
To: SeekAndFind
“They feel they have no voice in Washington, no voice in the political power structure,...”
....and no voice in the MSM....and that’s the way the Left wants to keep it....look for Limbaugh to be silenced within the year...ditto with Glen Beck.
To: SeekAndFind
If the New York Times isn’t publishing reviews on conservative books I certainly wouldn’t know it because I do not read the New York Times.
Seems fair.
I think I have found common cause with my tree hugging friends; destroying trees in order to manufacture newsprint to be used to publish the New York Times is bad for the environment. They should do us a favor and fall upon their sword.
Imagine generations hence trying to explain what was meant by the phrase “New York Times Bestseller”.
6 posted on
08/15/2009 7:34:57 AM PDT by
turfmann
To: SeekAndFind
They probably try to but just can’t find anyone who would consent to actually read such a book.
7 posted on
08/15/2009 7:37:15 AM PDT by
bkepley
To: SeekAndFind
They should interview Adrian Zachheim.
8 posted on
08/15/2009 7:37:48 AM PDT by
drubyfive
To: SeekAndFind
Why would anyone care about what the NYT does..The only reason they are still in business is the funds that Soro’s has given them just like the rest of the silly liberal so called news papers..Look at the networks all but FOX going down the tubes..No one cares what the Times has to say..
9 posted on
08/15/2009 7:40:21 AM PDT by
PLD
To: SeekAndFind
I am a non-intellectual conservative, can you please tell me what a New York Times is. Maybe when I get edumicated I can read it for my daily laugh.
10 posted on
08/15/2009 7:41:41 AM PDT by
certrtwngnut
(go to you tube @see screw the state of n.j.)
To: SeekAndFind
Dick Morris s not a conservative luminary
11 posted on
08/15/2009 7:41:50 AM PDT by
GeronL
(http://unitedcitizen.blogspot -Guilty of deviationism- http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: SeekAndFind
Who cares? The books are already selling and it isn’t as if the NY Times would give a conservative book a fair review in any event.
To: SeekAndFind
“President Obama promised a fundamental transformation of this country, he says, which presently stands as the wealthiest, most militarily powerful and freest country on the globe.
Which of those things would you like to change? he asks.”
Indeed!
17 posted on
08/15/2009 7:46:44 AM PDT by
rwa265
(Christ my Cornerstone)
To: SeekAndFind
"Patriot's History" got a very brief review within a review of "new conservative histories" from the Slimes. WaPo did a small hit on "48 Liberal Lies." USA Today mentioned "America's Victories" back in 2006 as part of a look at the literary "war on terror."
Actually, I'm not bothered at all that they don't review (i.e., attack) my book. What's the point? Will I gain a SINGLE NEW READER by them reviewing my book? Would I lose any? No and no.
18 posted on
08/15/2009 7:46:51 AM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: SeekAndFind
Levin was at the top for weeks!
19 posted on
08/15/2009 7:53:25 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
To: SeekAndFind
The public has spoken.
We could ask, "Who needs a review from the New York Times?"
22 posted on
08/15/2009 8:23:33 AM PDT by
GVnana
(Sarah for America)
To: SeekAndFind
I don’t read the times because it has absolutely no credibility at all.
To: SeekAndFind
"The New York Times did see fit to print reviews of major liberal books from Michael Moore (Dude, Where's My Country?), Eric Alterman (What Liberal Media?) and Al Franken (Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them) but has yet to examine the aforementioned right-leaning bestsellers. There goes the NYT excuse that the conservative books "lack intellectual heft." Moore, Alterman and Franken are pure sap. Comic books without the art.
25 posted on
08/15/2009 9:03:58 AM PDT by
cookcounty
("Education is not the filling of a bucket, but the lighting of a fire." ---Yeats)
To: SeekAndFind
"The New York Times did see fit to print reviews of major liberal books from Michael Moore (Dude, Where's My Country?), Eric Alterman (What Liberal Media?) and Al Franken (Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them) but has yet to examine the aforementioned right-leaning bestsellers. There goes the NYT excuse that the conservative books "lack intellectual heft." Moore, Alterman and Franken are pure sap. Comic books without the art.
26 posted on
08/15/2009 9:04:10 AM PDT by
cookcounty
("Education is not the filling of a bucket, but the lighting of a fire." ---Yeats)
To: SeekAndFind
Aren’t there any other Listings of Bestsellers??
28 posted on
08/15/2009 9:09:09 AM PDT by
cookcounty
("Education is not the filling of a bucket, but the lighting of a fire." ---Yeats)
To: SeekAndFind
That paper is a farce. It needs to be mocked even more openly amongst conservatives and Republican officials. The media needs to answer for their leftist, agenda driven propaganda. They are no friends to freedom of the press and are corrupt to the core. They deserve not even the appearance of legitimacy. The voices need to get louder and openly challenge them.
32 posted on
08/15/2009 9:40:19 AM PDT by
bushfamfan
(United States of America: July 4, 1776-November 4, 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson