Posted on 08/01/2009 9:22:48 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000
The difference?
FDR was a Socialist who loved his country.
At least he wasn’t an overt racist.
Just a comment on one statement. Bob Dole did work to rescue Soc Sec. But when he did it was not seen anything like an income redistribution program. In 83 there was genuine concern that those who had contributed oer their years would not receive the benefits they’d been expecting. They were expecting repayment in line with their prior cotributions. That’s not income redistribution AFDC was income redistribution.Obamacare will be a serious form of redistribution. But as conceived SSS was not, and that is what Dole and others tried to save.
FDR loved Uncle Joe Stalin. He was a commie.
"Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country."
What a lying note to end on. The majority of people who want socialist healthcare aren't looking at it as an opportunity "to do for their country". They see it as an opportunity for their country to do something for them, namely pay their doctor bills.
Also, the writer's characterization of Father Caughlin is tendentious and false. He should read Jonah Goldberg's book so that he can get his facts straight.
A socialist, and apparently an inspiration for future socialists.
FDR loved his drugs, period. He was in far too deep a stupor to be aware of his consequences.
Bolsheviks
Socialism is the means to the communist end.
It’s humans as stock farm animals. And communists are not above taking them to slaughter.
It’s slavery.
Whenever one human is FORCED to fund any part of another’s existence or the existence of the government IT IS SLAVERY!
The universe doesn’t recognize the subtleties—you are free, or you are not. Unless you want to split hairs in regard to the acceptability of ‘shades of slavery’ or the ‘degrees of slavery’ like someone with some kind of sick fetish.
NO MAN, NO GROUP OF MEN, IS FIT TO RULE ANOTHER!
It is a DEADLY game that will cause suffering and death yet AGAIN, just like it always has in history.
...A socialist and a statist.
From FDR’s Second BIll of Rights Speech
“It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.
This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.
As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.
We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.” People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.
Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
America’s own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens.”
“FDR was a Socialist who loved his country.”
That’s a damn lie!!!!
The difference? FDR was a Socialist who loved his country.
***Good one. Bump that.
Obama is a National Socialist
www.freerepublic.com ^ | October 27, 2008 | Kevmo ...
www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2116981/posts
FDR was a Socialist who loved his country.
Agree but he had all the other flaws Obama has.
Wasn't FDR's wife a lesbian and didn't FDR run around on his wife? Give Obama time ... he'll be like that too.
Agreed.
But did the US go to war on 1941 to defend the USSR from the Nazis and the Japs? I think so.
Did the US nuclear bomb the Japs to prevent them from rivaling the Soviets in future? Yes.
Did the USA occupy Japan and Germay to protect the Soviets? Yes.
Did the US stall their advance on the Western Front to let the Soviets gain control of Western Europe? Yes.
We’ve had Jimmah, Lyndon, Clinton, and now the arch Manchurian Candidate, Obama. So sad. The USA, last great hope of Democracy falls to internal corruption and Commie insurrection.
Democracy is ending.
Now comes the Dictatorship of ????????
I don’t know what FDR was, but my father, who served during WW2, used to call him a commie bas%ard.
You can’t judge Socialism by what it says to you. While it says “the good of society” its real goal is total control of “the Masses”.
It’s the old thing of the front of the package in the grocery store proclaiming miracles in color and dazzling visual effects, while the ingredient list on the back reveals the same old emasculated white flour and hydrogenated (carcinogenic) fat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.