Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five Reasons Journalists Love Higher Gas Prices
FOXNews.com ^ | July 29, 2009 | Dan Gainor

Posted on 08/01/2009 4:57:29 PM PDT by buzzyboop

It's the peak of summer --when sane people vacation and even Congress has recess. Last summer, it was also time for gas prices that peaked at stratospheric sums.

This summer not so much. While drivers might be thrilled, America's media are unhappy. Journalists don't believe no news is good news. No news for the working press means uncomfortable moments of silence punctuated by commercials.

It's easy to recall last year. ABC's Chris Cuomo did so July 8, reminiscing about better news days during one "Good Morning America" segment. "Alright, let me take you back one year from today. OK? Gas was at, like $4.14 a gallon. We were in a panic."

That certainly sums up the gas-price coverage from 2008. Any time you post a commodity's cost in numbers a couple feet high like they do in gas stations, consumers are going to be price sensitive. Throw in journalists ever eager to step on the gas and you have a recipe for national angst.

This year, the price of a regular gallon of gas is more than $1.60 less than last July's all-time high. The price isn't even near the high for 2009. Gas prices have dropped about 20 cents off that mark. Instead of pumping up positive economic news, journalists are paying little attention.

It's easy to understand. Reporters and anchors actually like higher gas prices -- even if viewers or readers don't. Remember, you don't count.

Here are five reasons journalists use to convince themselves high gas prices are news they can use.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gastas; journalists
The last one encompasses the first four, well for most so-called 'journalists' anyway.

This story is a couple days old, but I couldn't find it posted in a search, sorry if repeat. Cheers to all.

1 posted on 08/01/2009 4:57:30 PM PDT by buzzyboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: buzzyboop

All kinds of catastrophes and crisis make for good ratings and more publicity for the journalists covering it.

They’re probably also petulant about no Atlantic hurricanes so far too.


2 posted on 08/01/2009 5:06:52 PM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buzzyboop
Photobucket Uuuuhhhh, he said gas. Photobucket

Oh, yeah, heh, heh. Guys who write stuff eat at Taco Bell and then they get gas...that's cool! Or maybe they are like environmental whackos who think that like, walking to work 9 miles away would like reduce global cooling or something.*

*I told my wife she could either buy me a Rolex or the Beavis And Butthead box set for my birthday. Take a wild guess what I got. 7k for a watch was a waste.

3 posted on 08/01/2009 5:17:12 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

YYyyeeeeessssss!


4 posted on 08/01/2009 6:40:26 PM PDT by kickonly88 (I love fossil fuel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: buzzyboop
No news is good news - because good news "isn't news."

And that is the bias of journalism - the tendency to profit from the misfortunes of others.


5 posted on 08/01/2009 7:00:59 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buzzyboop

I guess they also never made the connection between high gas prices/energy costs and the economic troubles it precipitated.

I blame the Democrats policy of demonizing fossil fuels as the impetus for the majority of our economic woes.


6 posted on 08/01/2009 7:19:43 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buzzyboop

Exxon-Mobil reported profits down 66% in the last quarter - why aren’t the MSM and ‘rats demanding an investigation and hearings the way they do when profits go up dramatically?.......


7 posted on 08/01/2009 7:31:53 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
The Ex-Mob is Ok w/this, they know they're dealin' w/Rats jus' like them(takes one to know one).

They also keep many sets of books, I think the mafia learnt this from them.

They also know they have a stranglehold on the second most plentyful fluid on erf.

And they also know, unlike the most plentyful fluid, the erf will always keep making more .

But don't tell anybody or else they have to kilt you.

8 posted on 08/02/2009 7:00:17 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
On top of that, ExxonMobil's tax burden for the just finished second quarter was 50%! I guess to the wacko left, their down profits were still a windfall. Lord help us all. Cheers
9 posted on 08/02/2009 2:14:52 PM PDT by buzzyboop (I am Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson