Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stefan Cook's Birth Certificate Case Gets Short Shrift in Florida
Orlando Republican Examiner ^ | July 30, 2009 | Blas Padrino

Posted on 08/01/2009 2:44:02 PM PDT by kellynla

After being dismissed in Georgia and refiled in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Judge Richard A. Lazzara quickly dismissed the claim of Major Stephan Cook against various defendants, including President Barack Obama.

The ground for dismissal without prejudice given by the court is lack of jurisdiction.

The order was signed on July 27, 2009. Apparently, since the allegations of the Florida claim are grounded on Federal statutes against employment discrimination, such a claim must be presented first before the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission for resolution.

Maj. Cook’s original claim contesting the validity of his orders to deploy to Afghanistan rested on the alleged lack of authority of the President as Commander-in-Chief due to uncertainty about Mr. Obama’s United States’ citizenship.

That claim became moot when his orders to deploy were revoked, and the case was dismissed. However, Maj. Cook was subsequently dismissed from his employment with Simtech, Inc., a private company working under contract with the Department of Defense. In his Florida claim, he argued that his dismissal was due to pressure from the Defense Department.

Shown below are a video of an interview with Maj. Cook and his attorney, Dr. Lory Taitz, and a copy of the District Court’s docket sheet on his Florida case.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: certifigate; eligibility; obama; orlytaitz; potus; stefancook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
I didn't see this already posted. So here it is.
1 posted on 08/01/2009 2:44:02 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

ping


2 posted on 08/01/2009 2:46:16 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Shown below are a video of an interview with Maj. Cook and his attorney, Dr. Lory Taitz


3 posted on 08/01/2009 2:47:58 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

What is it going to take to get this thing heard? It can’t be that every case doesn’t have merit or is filed in the wrong court or the attorney is an idiot or the judge just had a bad hair day.


4 posted on 08/01/2009 2:48:29 PM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The ground for dismissal without prejudice given by the court is lack of jurisdiction.

Sounds like the judge pulled a Sotamayer?

5 posted on 08/01/2009 2:52:43 PM PDT by McGruff (Where's the REAL birth certificate? - Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Case Schedules:

- Apuzzo in NJ 3rd Aug

- Taitz in CA next month?

- Berg 3rd Fed District Oct 26.


6 posted on 08/01/2009 2:55:06 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bgill
She is an inexperienced attorney with an on-line degree.

But...There aren't many other attorney's out there willing to confront Obama, so...GOOD FOR HER! She's the best we've got so I'm here cheering her on.

7 posted on 08/01/2009 2:55:49 PM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

If we were to have to fight the Revolutionary War today, it wouldn’t even get off the ground.

Judges are wusses apparently and no one wants to get holding the Hot Potato.


8 posted on 08/01/2009 2:56:09 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

“What is it going to take to get this thing heard?”

Not to worry, there is a certain U.S. District Judge ( a Marine ) in Santa Ana, CA who has already set for hearing: Cook vs. Obama.

I expect the judge to rule, “President Obama, I need to see your Birth Certificate.” BIG SMILE


9 posted on 08/01/2009 2:57:17 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Well, the fact that EVERY case dismissed without even hearing the case shows it’s not anything to do with laws.

Fear or downright bias seems to be the problem. Right up to the SCOTUS.


10 posted on 08/01/2009 2:57:47 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

What’s happening with the California case?


11 posted on 08/01/2009 2:58:22 PM PDT by Danae (I AM JIM THOMPSON - Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

According to Jack Cashill, that sentence could have been written by Obama himself, as not having subject and verb in agreement in just that manner is one of his characteristic English usage mistakes.


12 posted on 08/01/2009 2:58:27 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

“Judges are wusses apparently and no one wants to get holding the Hot Potato.”

not all...read my post#9


13 posted on 08/01/2009 2:58:50 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Danae

“What’s happening with the California case?”

set for hearing...no I don’t know the date.


14 posted on 08/01/2009 2:59:50 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

From your typed words to God’s ears. I pray this judge does do the right thing and not be bullied or afraid of a political party.


15 posted on 08/01/2009 3:00:00 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Danae

the Judge had the defendant Obama re-served since his lawyers disputed he was not served properly earlier this year. Obama had the SS act as a firewall to keep the serving officer from giving him the court summons who eventually served someone at the Justice Department. A stall tactic by Obama. This time though, Judge Carter pulled 2 Goverment DAs out of their offices or from the hallway and served them on behalf of Obama. ..LoL! They were not too pleased I hear. Carter alluded to the effect that the case will go forward to be seen on the merits. we will wait and see. He gave Obama 60 days to respond.


16 posted on 08/01/2009 3:08:29 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Do you know the date of the hearing in Santa Ana?


17 posted on 08/01/2009 3:12:36 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

can you expand on this? when is it? is it orly’s case? any details would be great.


18 posted on 08/01/2009 3:12:39 PM PDT by spacejunkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Needs to exhaust his administrative remedies, then file another lawsuit. He’ll eventually get his day in court.


19 posted on 08/01/2009 3:18:55 PM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie01

If you go to Orly’s blog you can get all the info.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/

And wnd.com has a link for just about everything regarding Cook vs. Obama

Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?
WND’s complete archive of news reports on the issue
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98546


20 posted on 08/01/2009 3:32:04 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson