Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gates, Maliki Discuss U.S.-Iraqi Security Partnership
American Forces Press Service ^ | Gerry J. Gilmore

Posted on 07/23/2009 4:50:24 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, July 23, 2009 – Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki discussed Iraq security issues when the two met at the Pentagon late this afternoon.

Gates and Maliki addressed the U.S.-Iraqi security relationship and equipment needs for Iraqi soldiers and police, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said.

Their conversation, Morrell said, focused “largely on our security partnership, on ways that we can continue to help the Iraqi security forces grow in size and capability, so that they are able to fully exert their sovereignty and protect the people from external and internal threats.”

Gates acknowledged during today’s meeting with Maliki that the current processes employed to provide equipment to Iraqi military and police are too slow and need to be streamlined, Morrell said.

Therefore, he continued, Gates is “working on creative ways” to provide Iraqi security forces -- and other allies – the equipment that they need as quickly as possible.

“Speed and flexibility are what our system needs and doesn’t have to the degree that we would like,” Morrell said.

Gates and Maliki also discussed the “tremendous progress” that’s been made in Iraq over the past few years, he said.

President Barack Obama and Maliki discussed the June 30 transfer of security leadership to Iraqi authorities at a news conference held yesterday at the White House. American military forces withdrew from Iraqi cities and towns as part of the agreement.

“This transition was part of our security agreement and should send an unmistakable signal that we will keep our commitments with the sovereign Iraqi government,” Obama said at yesterday’s news conference.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: frwn; gates; iraq; maliki

1 posted on 07/23/2009 4:50:25 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; freekitty; majhenrywest; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.

WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!

2 posted on 07/23/2009 4:51:00 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
What does bug me at this point is there should be nothing lost in translations within the SOFA. Both sides should have in every major and minor issue been fully in agreement with what was signed off.
To many conflicting reports of lately as what our military can or can't do. I watch CSPAN DoD, and Defense Link DoD videos and get one side of it from our commanding generals then read this crap. How will it effect long term commitments as how we had agreed to stay and continue to build their forces over a long period of time.
3 posted on 07/23/2009 5:13:35 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson