Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Media Follies
Townhall.com ^ | July 23, 2009 | Emmett Tyrrell

Posted on 07/23/2009 4:31:15 AM PDT by Kaslin

What follows is a column adducing still more evidence of the trivial nature of the contemporary American news media.

The other morning, I was lying in bed recovering from minor surgery, my body heaving off the residual effects of a powerful anesthetic, Proposal. Believe me; it is a powerful anesthetic. It thrust me into the utmost darkness for 40 minutes, according to my doctor. It could have been for eternity. I would have had no idea. I cannot imagine why people abuse such charmless drugs. Why not just pull the trigger as Hemingway pulled the trigger and enter the darkness forever with absolutely no more pain? Incidentally, Proposal is one of the substances Michael Jackson repaired to for sleep. If he found security in Proposal, his life must have been hell when he was awake.

Yet -- to return to Washington and my trivial media story -- the last aftereffects of Proposal were giving way as I read my doctor's strict instructions. For the remainder of the day, I was not to "drive a car ... use a hot stove ... use heavy machinery ... or make important decisions." As I read his enjoinder against making important decisions, the telephone rang. A media booker was at my ear inquiring as to whether I would accept the invitation of a well-known cable news show to talk about how the Republican Party was being affected by Obama critics who have been harassing Democratic politicians with claims that the president does not have a legitimate birth certificate and was born abroad, perhaps in Botswana or Upper Volta or Lapland. On his provenance, there is no unanimity among these critics.

Well, my doctor's instructions did counsel that I not "make important decisions," but how would that hinder me on a political talk show? As I saw it, I would be in perfect condition to answer the witty ripostes of cable news's talking heads, say Tucker Carlson or Jon Stewart. I agreed to do the afternoon show as long as I did not have to drive a car or use heavy machinery to get to the studio. Moreover, I had good news for the booker. Choosing me to discuss the president's national origins was an inspired choice. A crack reporter of mine at The American Spectator had investigated the matter when it was a hot rumor during the presidential election and found no empirical evidence in support of the story.

Better yet, the Spectator's reporter found evidence militating against the story. At the time of Obama's birth, in 1961, a notice of the blessed event was published in the major Hawaiian newspaper. I would not rule out dark and treacherous conspiracies by a Democratic president, especially one in cahoots with Rahm Emanuel, but a conspiracy going back almost five decades exceeds even Emanuel's diablerie. Thus, I would gladly appear on this news show and present evidence that the questions about the president's place of birth are without merit. The news story is nonsense. Those who dwell on it are distracting us from today's real issues: the Obama administration's bankrupting of the country, its attempt to transform American health care into a rationing system against senior citizens and the chronically ill, its cap-and-trade bill guaranteeing high unemployment and higher energy costs in time of recession.

Well, ha-ha-ha. Back comes my disappointed booker after conveying the good news that we would be setting the record straight on the show shortly. Alas, the show's producers did not want me to set the record straight. They had wanted me to defend the false story. But I reminded the booker that I knew the story to be false. In fact, I had provided the show with irrefutable proof that the story is false. Obama is American-born.

The show proceeded to find a guest who would repeat the false story, either knowingly or out of ignorance. So much for getting to the truth of issues on television. As for me, I never knowingly would publish anything that I knew to be untrue, not in this column or in The American Spectator.

I shall make a prediction. This presidency is going to be one of the greatest presidential disappointments in a generation. Arriving on the grim winds of recession with two wars already going on, the administration's failures are going to be a serious challenge to the country's well-being. If major media continue to treat the news as entertainment rather than as the dissemination and analysis of fact, they are going to create still more danger for the country. I say let them eat Proposal.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: tas; tyrrell

1 posted on 07/23/2009 4:31:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Better yet, the Spectator's reporter found evidence militating against the story. At the time of Obama's birth, in 1961, a notice of the blessed event was published in the major Hawaiian newspaper.

Which newspaper, and where can I see a copy of the notice?

2 posted on 07/23/2009 4:38:50 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("Baldrick, to you the Renaissance was just something that happened to other people, wasn't it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

I believe the author was being sarcastic


3 posted on 07/23/2009 4:46:28 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for 0bama: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

A notice of a Blessed event in a newspaper,isnt a Birth Certificate. Take the newspaper down to get a passport and see if it works.


4 posted on 07/23/2009 4:48:27 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

The only thing a birth notice in a newspaper proves is that grandparents exist.

My grandparents have placed literally dozens of birth notices in the paper and not once have they been asked to provide proof. For a few bucks I could place my own birth notice in the paper and sure enough, there it would be in a few days.


5 posted on 07/23/2009 4:52:20 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I believe the author was being sarcastic.

No, I've since done some poking around, and the announcement does exist. And this might be reliable information if you're examining, say, a 50-year-old murder where details are sketchy and there's no other source of information. But when the actual birth certificate is readily available, there's no reason why we should have to rely on things of this nature.

6 posted on 07/23/2009 5:16:46 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("Baldrick, to you the Renaissance was just something that happened to other people, wasn't it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

If, indeed, he is American-born I have two questions:
1) Why would he spend almost $1 million to fight the lawsuits rather than turn over a real birth certificate?
2) If he is American-born will he release his Occidental and Columbia transcripts to see if he received fraudulent foreign-born scholarship money?


7 posted on 07/23/2009 6:35:34 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Inwoodian

Both good questions.


8 posted on 07/23/2009 8:09:35 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("Baldrick, to you the Renaissance was just something that happened to other people, wasn't it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson