Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Swine Flu Resembles 1918 Virus
Fox News ^ | July 13, 2009 | Reuters

Posted on 07/13/2009 11:15:14 AM PDT by AngieGal

The new H1N1 influenza virus bears a disturbing resemblance to the virus strain that caused the 1918 flu pandemic, with a greater ability to infect the lungs than common seasonal flu viruses, researchers reported on Monday.

Tests in several animals confirmed other studies that have shown the new swine flu strain can spread beyond the upper respiratory tract to go deep into the lungs — making it more likely to cause pneumonia, the international team said.

In addition, they found that people who survived the 1918 pandemic seem to have extra immune protection against the virus, again confirming the work of other researchers.

"When we conducted the experiments in ferrets and monkeys, the seasonal virus did not replicate in the lungs," said Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin, who led the study.

The H1N1 virus replicates significantly better in the lungs."

The new swine flu virus has caused the first pandemic of the 21st century, infecting more than a million people, according to estimates, and killing at least 500. The World Health Organization says it is causing mostly moderate disease but Kawaoka said that does not mean it is like seasonal flu.

"There is a misunderstanding about this virus," he said in a statement. "There is clear evidence the virus is different than seasonal influenza."

Writing in the journal Nature, Kawaoka and colleagues noted that the ability to infect the lungs is a characteristic of other pandemic viruses, especially the 1918 virus, which is estimated to have killed between 40 million and 100 million people.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1918; flu; h1n1; influenza; swineflu; virus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2009 11:15:14 AM PDT by AngieGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AngieGal
Might be, but think about the state of medical care and hygiene in 1918. You couldn't drink the water in 80% of the country. There is no real similarity at all.
2 posted on 07/13/2009 11:17:42 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

Swine Flu- Gore and his croonies cure for Global Warming.


3 posted on 07/13/2009 11:18:26 AM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

1918 lets see, a war was going on, there were no antibiotics, hygiene was different (in the USA).


4 posted on 07/13/2009 11:20:19 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal
What do they mean by “survivors of the 1918 flu had extra immune protection”?
5 posted on 07/13/2009 11:21:14 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

You also had a whole lot more people who were rural, and able to stay home, avoid crowds, and take care of themselves and family members

And no global jet travel where a person sick in Hong Kong could be in NYC 18 hours later

Face it, the greatest medical system in the world can’t put tens of thousands of people on respirators, even if it would keep them alive. And most Americans will find it very hard to stay hunkered down at home for weeks if schools and grocery stores are closed


6 posted on 07/13/2009 11:24:31 AM PDT by silverleaf (Save the earth. It's the only planet with chocolate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
What do they mean by “survivors of the 1918 flu had extra immune protection”?

They're immortal, which is why the scientists can still use them for research....

7 posted on 07/13/2009 11:24:56 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal
When we conducted the experiments in ferrets and monkeys...

Ferrets?

8 posted on 07/13/2009 11:25:38 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
"What do they mean by “survivors of the 1918 flu had extra immune protection”? "

They mean people who were alive in 1918, and were exposed to the Spanish Flu and have survived until today seem to have added immunity protection against H1N1 that people who weren't exposed to Spanish Flu don't.

9 posted on 07/13/2009 11:25:49 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

Well, not to get paranoid, but I have to wonder if something didn’t escape from one of the labs that were investigating the 1918 Spanish Influenza.


10 posted on 07/13/2009 11:27:44 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

In 1918, we also did not have millions of people with HIV, AIDs and 3rd world immigrants who are sitting ducks and vectors for other diseases of opportunity that will accompany a flu pandemmic, My G Grandmother survived the 1918 flu but was brain damaged by encephalitis


11 posted on 07/13/2009 11:28:12 AM PDT by silverleaf (Save the earth. It's the only planet with chocolate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Add the lack of indoor plumbing & no anti-biotics. That is who the swine flu will hit the hardest - Those in the world who are still living like it’s 1918.


12 posted on 07/13/2009 11:28:37 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

If it just kills old people and the infirmed, Obama will take credit for it as part of his cost-saving health care plan.


13 posted on 07/13/2009 11:29:20 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Those that has the flu in 1918 and survived still carried antibodies 70-80 years later, is how I read it.


14 posted on 07/13/2009 11:29:49 AM PDT by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
"Face it, the greatest medical system in the world can’t put tens of thousands of people on respirators, even if it would keep them alive. And most Americans will find it very hard to stay hunkered down at home for weeks if schools and grocery stores are closed"

That's exactly right. I have no idea how this latest pandemic compares to 1918. But, if that 1918 Flu would have happened today, instead of then, it would still be very, very deadly. It probably wouldn't be as deadly as it was 100 years ago because of advances as distribution of modern medicine, but millions would be dead in America, and tens or hundreds of millions globally. An influenza with a 3.5% mortality rate (like the Spanish Flu), would be devastating today.

15 posted on 07/13/2009 11:30:25 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san
"Add the lack of indoor plumbing & no anti-biotics."

In point of fact, the H1N1 virus, well it's a virus. Antibiotics have no effect on viruses. However, there are two antivirals available today that have shown to be effective against this latest strain, save for two known cases (one in Europe and one in San Francisco) that appear to be drug-resistant.

16 posted on 07/13/2009 11:32:59 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

I have been sick with a lung issues and coughing for the last three weeks. I am starting to suspect H1N1, I was sick earlier for a few weeks with something before this latest bout.


17 posted on 07/13/2009 11:34:44 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Actually, it is a type of flu that causes a “cytokine storm” so that those with the strongest immune systems die the fastest- in 1918, the young and healthy got sick and died in a day. Not that those with compromised immune systems fare much better. But I read one study that anti-arthritis drugs (which suppress the immune system) showed some good effect

history
http://www.riskinstitute.org/peri/images/file/Lessons_from_1918_PartI.pdf

18 posted on 07/13/2009 11:35:04 AM PDT by silverleaf (Save the earth. It's the only planet with chocolate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

duh....one flu virus resembles another one....both have protein coats and strands of DNA inside...time to shell out the next Pulitzer Prize for Journalism!


19 posted on 07/13/2009 11:38:16 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

If they make it MANDATORY that all Americans receive the vaccine, then I do not want it.


20 posted on 07/13/2009 11:39:26 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson