Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ginsburg: I thought Roe was to rid undesirables
WND ^ | 7/8/09 | staff

Posted on 07/08/2009 6:57:10 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-229 next last
To: pissant

Well, she would be on top of the list.


61 posted on 07/08/2009 7:21:34 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phatus maximus

The same undesirables that Hitler and Margret Sanger wanted to rid the world of; blacks, Down’s children, Jews, etc.


62 posted on 07/08/2009 7:22:46 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
She’s gotten so old and senile that she’s telling the truth in public. Fascinating.

She's old and senile. Joe Biden is just plain stooopid.

63 posted on 07/08/2009 7:22:49 PM PDT by Free State Four
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Wow.


64 posted on 07/08/2009 7:23:03 PM PDT by lmr (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The agenda exposed, at last.


65 posted on 07/08/2009 7:23:06 PM PDT by joe.fralick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

I just don’t know what to say....


66 posted on 07/08/2009 7:27:14 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
That is the exact reasoning Howard Stern gave for supporting abortion.

Maybe she can get a Satellite deal.

67 posted on 07/08/2009 7:27:29 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses; pissant

Pro-Life bump


68 posted on 07/08/2009 7:27:37 PM PDT by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pissant

An honest liberal — for once.


69 posted on 07/08/2009 7:27:47 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

If she thought that was what Roe meant back then, then we can easily go back and see that she vigorously opposed it, right?

After all, I’m sure she was dead set against such a ruling, being the cofounder of the Women’s Rights Law Reporter and being an ACLU stooge, and all.


70 posted on 07/08/2009 7:28:40 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: pissant

bookmark


71 posted on 07/08/2009 7:29:21 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

I am amazed she said this to the media

If Ginsberg wanted to outpopulate some others - she had her chance to contribute to that agenda and passed

Some groups have a really low replacement rate - that is their own fault

Ginsberg sounds just like Sanger :

“In 1939, Margaret Sanger organized a “Negro project” to eliminate what she called an “inferior race.” She claimed, “The masses of Negroes.....”

(Hey! I was a blond blue-eyed kid once!)


72 posted on 07/08/2009 7:29:30 PM PDT by devolve (- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sarah Palin 2012 - - - - - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Yet she survives.

... and Zero wants more like her.

73 posted on 07/08/2009 7:29:48 PM PDT by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” - like the Jews Ms. Ginsburg? Sort of ironic if it wasn’t so tragic.


74 posted on 07/08/2009 7:29:55 PM PDT by calico_thompson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You should read the whole interview at NY Times. The WND quotes are rather misleading. She goes on to say she realized her perception(about Roe v Wade) was wrong.


75 posted on 07/08/2009 7:30:25 PM PDT by visualops (portraits.artlife.us or visit my freeper page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pke

Ruth Bader Dimbulb


76 posted on 07/08/2009 7:31:25 PM PDT by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: visualops

I read it. So then by extension she was vigorously opposed to it until 1980 when the light bulb finally flickered?


77 posted on 07/08/2009 7:31:30 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: pissant
An accidental stark moment of clarity.

Precisely.

Just imagine the reaction if, say, Samuel Alito had said this...

78 posted on 07/08/2009 7:32:50 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Unbelievable! Wonder if she wanted blond, blue eyed kids only...like Hitler.

That kind of racism is easy to counteract by changing the makeup of the court. Sotomayor thinks the blond, blue eyed ones are the undesireables, so it'll balance out now.

79 posted on 07/08/2009 7:32:59 PM PDT by Wissa ("So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause."-Padme Amidala)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: visualops

Here’s NARAL’s take:

Justice Ginsburg is one of the strongest supporters of the right to choose on the Supreme Court. Her opinions while on the Court, as well as her professional activities prior to becoming a federal court judge in 1980, demonstrate her commitment to the constitutional rights of privacy and choice.


80 posted on 07/08/2009 7:33:05 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson