1 posted on
07/04/2009 5:09:47 AM PDT by
yongin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: yongin
As if....Romney is a socialist. We’ve already got one of those.
2 posted on
07/04/2009 5:11:21 AM PDT by
Vor Lady
("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." JFK)
To: yongin
3 posted on
07/04/2009 5:11:24 AM PDT by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
To: yongin
4 posted on
07/04/2009 5:11:52 AM PDT by
sonrise57
(Help us God for evil men have surrounded us.)
To: yongin
Will money buy off his dictatorship?
Will money buy off the dead murdered by his incompetance?
Will money buy off those harmed by his RomneyCARE?
Will money buy off his corruption of fake badges and BIGdig coverup?
Will money buy off his other lies, fantasies, and backstabbing?
5 posted on
07/04/2009 5:13:16 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: yongin
Almost but not quite as bad an idea as letting George Soros sponsor and taint CPAC.
Money like that has strings attached.
I’d rather we pass the hat here for Sarah.
6 posted on
07/04/2009 5:13:40 AM PDT by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: yongin
Time for Palin to switch to being a fiscally conservative Independent....
7 posted on
07/04/2009 5:13:51 AM PDT by
cranked
To: yongin
If Palin is as smart as I think she is, all things political are on the back burner until this country finishes with the social correction that is about to take place.
That means, when americans wake up and realize what marxist socialism really is, and they(americans) finish hanging politicians from the trees around Washington city, than she and many others will get back into public service.
8 posted on
07/04/2009 5:16:04 AM PDT by
exnavy
(I'll keep my God and my guns, the dems can keep the change.)
To: yongin
Another question would be: If Palin does give her endorsement to Romney and campaigns for him in the primary, does this lower your view of Palin?
10 posted on
07/04/2009 5:16:41 AM PDT by
yongin
To: yongin
Many FReepers are skeptical of Romney's conservative credentials.
Skeptical is an understatement. The last person we need to run for President is someone who supports socialized health care. BO is using Romney's disastrous Massachusetts health care plan as a model for a national health care plan.
11 posted on
07/04/2009 5:16:55 AM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
To: yongin
F*** Romney his magic underwear and his Mass-of-2-$h!t$ leftist ways.....
12 posted on
07/04/2009 5:17:56 AM PDT by
Vaquero
("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: yongin
She doesn’t need the money. People like us have already contributed toward retiring that burden of legal cost.
Mitt had better put it in gear trying to defeat Obama socialism because there may be nothing not attacked by Sarah before he gets his big boy pants on in the next thirty days.
I hope she treats him fairly in considering her VP choices.
13 posted on
07/04/2009 5:18:38 AM PDT by
KC Burke
(...but He has made the trains run on time.)
To: yongin; SolidWood; euram; Diogenesis; fieldmarshaldj; Al B.; SoCalPol
After laying low all these months, you’re now trying awful hard to get FR to swallow the Romney horse pill. Forget it.
14 posted on
07/04/2009 5:18:53 AM PDT by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: yongin
Don’t assume that Romney isn’t already acceptable to many Freepers. He is.
We’re just bored with fighting the same stupid arguments with the same handful of bitter Romney-bashers.
Time will tell. It’ll be interesting to see what happens between him and Sarah.
To: yongin
vanity should realize Sarah has her own support, she ain’t backing a nerd.
17 posted on
07/04/2009 5:19:57 AM PDT by
The Wizard
(DemonRATS: enemies of America)
To: yongin
LOL and ibtz. In case you have not caught on, Mittie is persona non grata around here.
iow we ain’t buying what yer sellin’
Also. Sarah ain’t for sale, you tool.
18 posted on
07/04/2009 5:20:05 AM PDT by
don-o
(My son, Ben - Marine PFC- 1/16/09 - Parris Island - LC -6/4/09 - 29 Palms - Camp Pendleton 6/18)
To: yongin
20 posted on
07/04/2009 5:22:59 AM PDT by
Eddie01
(I'd run for congress if I wasn't afraid my family would be destroyed.)
To: yongin
The Palin’s don't need his money...The advance for the book she is writing has seven figures. She has turned down hundreds of paying speaking opportunities, which she now can honor.
Now she has time to finish the book and get it to the presses faster. Do the book tour, appear on the talk shows etc etc etc.
Sarah has read the tealeaves and she's sitting down at the table to pour.
21 posted on
07/04/2009 5:23:01 AM PDT by
hoosiermama
(ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
To: yongin
If that actually happened then I would lose much if not all respect for Sarah and I’d still say Romney is a flopping socialist.
I highly doubt Sarah is bought.
22 posted on
07/04/2009 5:23:17 AM PDT by
LinnKeyes2000
(Palin/(some other conservative type)2012)
To: yongin
Republicans need Palin more than Palin needs Republicans.
24 posted on
07/04/2009 5:23:51 AM PDT by
Daisyjane69
(Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
To: yongin
If Romney does this action, would it make him acceptable to Freepers? No.
I for one will not be bought off by Romney.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
