[counterpunch]

I've engaged in a couple discussions about Sarah Palin recently, and every post has been in response to replies I have given.
It's a pretty topical subject right now, you know.
I don't think they are 'anti-Palin' as you state, but simply debating with some pretty obvious Palin diehards that she is not the best person to run against 0bama in 2012, because of stuff like this, and because she's already been on the losing end of that once before. I've mostly stuck to the historical record that rematches never turn out well.
I believe quite strongly that if the GOP is to recover and have a chance of taking 0bama out of office, we are going to have to return to being the party of serious individuals, like we were in the 80s and 90s.

I've also done other stuff recently, though. Like this animation:

[angkor]

I’m not gonna’ respond, in the hopes that you’ll cool your jets.

[syriacus]

Great Obama/Chavez/Obama/Chavez morphing!!!

[American in Israel]

I've mostly stuck to the historical record that rematches never turn out well.

Funny, I do not recall Palin running against Obama, I thought it was McCain against Obama.

The odd thing about your posts is you make such obvious cognition errors, your foundation seems always to include a lie or glaring error. I find you puzzling. If you are a republican, (see Free Republic above) you seem to be suffering DEMentia. As our union dissolves into the Haters and the Doers, it seems you think like a hater and wear a doer hat.

Sigh, all that blather above for a troll after all.