Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Also this little previously unreported tidbit from Fred Malek:
Fred Malek, who served as a national finance committee chair for McCain's presidential bid, said that he recently hosted a foreign policy lunch at Palin's request in which she mixed with the likes of former secretary of defense Frank Carlucci and former deputy secretary of state Strobe Talbott.

"She has been vastly underestimated as a result of one or two interviews," said Malek of Palin. "I have spent a lot of time around her and can state unequivocally she is smart, perceptive, curious, and absolutely on top of issues like energy which are pivotal to her role as Alaska's Governor. "

Looks like the GOP's premier rainmaker is firmly on her side.
1 posted on 07/02/2009 7:08:13 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Al B.
Not only that, she is someone who likes to run.
2 posted on 07/02/2009 7:12:10 AM PDT by secret garden (Dubiety reigns here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

I believe that her hesitancy in answering questions during the interviews was due to a desire not to contradict the positions of the one at the top of the ticket, rather than a lack of knowledge.


3 posted on 07/02/2009 7:13:34 AM PDT by I-ambush (I didn't think, I never dreamed, that I would be around to see it all come true-McCartney and Wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

The day Sarah Palin becomes a pariah within the GOP is the day the GOP ceases to be a serious political party.


5 posted on 07/02/2009 7:17:13 AM PDT by MNSlim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

Sarah’s credibility or lack of it will always be an issue until she gains the GOP nomination. No politician is perfect.

But given the choice if you were an aspiring politician would you rather be deficient in name recognition, charisma, the ability to raise money, or to attract MSM attention or large crowds or be perceived to be deficient in lacking gravitas or the requisite knowledge.

99% of politicians would choose the latter alternative.

“It is easier to study up and get SMARTER than it is to not have a personality and try to get one.”

Roger Simon


6 posted on 07/02/2009 7:17:28 AM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.
What earthly good could come of meetings with Strobe Talbot?
10 posted on 07/02/2009 7:21:13 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.
“Sarah Palin will be a leader in this party,” said Steele during an appearance Wednesday on “Morning Joe.” “She has the ability to galvanize the base, and even folks outside the base. “And I think all the hindsight second guessing and back looking does nothing.”

Wow that's quite a statement. And an accurate one. Pity the fool who has to run against her.

11 posted on 07/02/2009 7:25:28 AM PDT by McGruff (Secrecy is essential for the Fed to operate properly - Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

Yes, I still like Sarah Palin!
By Camille Paglia
Nov. 12, 2008 | [excerpts]

“...Liberal Democrats are going to wake up from their sadomasochistic, anti-Palin orgy with a very big hangover.

The evil genie released during this sorry episode will not so easily go back into its bottle. A shocking level of irrational emotionalism and at times infantile rage was exposed at the heart of current Democratic ideology — contradicting Democratic core principles of compassion, tolerance and independent thought. One would have to look back to the Eisenhower 1950s for parallels to this grotesque lock-step parade of bourgeois provincialism, shallow groupthink and blind prejudice.

I like Sarah Palin, and I’ve heartily enjoyed her arrival on the national stage. As a career classroom teacher, I can see how smart she is — and quite frankly, I think the people who don’t see it are the stupid ones, wrapped in the fuzzy mummy-gauze of their own worn-out partisan dogma.

So she doesn’t speak the King’s English — big whoop! There is a powerful clarity of consciousness in her eyes.

She uses language with the jumps, breaks and rippling momentum of a be-bop saxophonist. I stand on what I said (as a staunch pro-choice advocate) in my last two columns — that Palin as a pro-life wife, mother and ambitious professional represents the next big shift in feminism. Pro-life women will save feminism by expanding it, particularly into the more traditional Third World.

As for the Democrats who sneered and howled that Palin was unprepared to be a vice-presidential nominee — what navel-gazing hypocrisy!

What protests were raised in the party or mainstream media when John Edwards, with vastly less political experience than Palin, got John Kerry’s nod for veep four years ago?

And Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, for whom I lobbied to be Obama’s pick and who was on everyone’s short list for months, has a record indistinguishable from Palin’s.

Whatever knowledge deficit Palin has about the federal bureaucracy or international affairs (outside the normal purview of governors) will hopefully be remedied during the next eight years of the Obama presidencies.

The U.S. Senate as a career option? What a claustrophobic, nitpicking comedown for an energetic Alaskan — nothing but droning committees and incestuous back-scratching.

No, Sarah Palin should stick to her governorship and just hit the rubber-chicken circuit,.. Step by step, the mainstream media will come around, wipe its own mud out of its eyes, and see Palin for the populist phenomenon that she is. ...” — By Camille Paglia

http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2008/11/12/palin/print.html


12 posted on 07/02/2009 7:25:40 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Obama has entered the "cracking stage" of his presidency. ~ Gagdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.
Governor Palin will not be considered a realistic choice for 2012 until she demonstrates in public that she has a grasp of the issue beyond energy. Her speeches, while they are excellent red meat for the base, rarely display specifics or substance.

Having seen the governor's debate with rivals for governor in 2006, and her lenghty interview with Marie Bartiromo on CNBC it is clear to me that when she achieves a grasp of issues Palin is a formidable debater and interviewee. In both cases she was operating on solid and familiar ground. She needs to develop easy familiarity with issues like health care, Iran, TARP, et. al. Until then she will be at a disadvantage in the contest with GOP rivals like Romney, and especially with a smooth operatpr like Obama.

13 posted on 07/02/2009 7:25:48 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.
The excerpt above says nothing. So Steele was supportive, So what? Is this crumbs to the starving Palin for president groupies? How about she lead opposition to a national issue like health care or cap and trade posted in an article to rally the rest of us?
14 posted on 07/02/2009 7:28:01 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

The WaPo fails to mention the 24/7 attacks launched by itself and the rest of the so-called “mainstream” media. Probably just an oversight.


19 posted on 07/02/2009 7:35:54 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

“In Anchorage on the coastal trail there have been many times where I’ve had to stop right in my tracks and turn around because there’s been either a moose standing there staring at me or a moose’s butt plopping on over into the trail. I have to turn around and leave or I’m going to get clobbered.” ~Sarah Palin for RunnersWorld.com


20 posted on 07/02/2009 7:38:51 AM PDT by WakeUpAndVote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.
Palin's "...role as the party's 2008 vice presidential nominee..." was she saved McLoser from a crushing McGovernesque defeat. If Mc selected some wishy-washy wuss-RINO-moderate, he loses by 10, 12 or 15 pct points and loses by 250 EVs.

McCain received 58 million votes. 10 or 15 million of those people wouldn't have crossed the street to shake his hand.

The fact the lib/leftdemholemediawhores - and RINOs - are still trying to take her down shows that they're terrified. Otherwise they'd ignore her.

21 posted on 07/02/2009 7:38:56 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SolidWood; euram; SoCalPol

PING


26 posted on 07/02/2009 7:45:06 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

Any chance Sarah might consider vocally defending Honduras and becoming the world spokesperson for that beleaguered nation?

The Hondurans’ defense of their constitution is going to break big-time to the conservative side and anybody backing them is going to look good. The opposition will look like a pack of (oh wait, they are!) leftists.


30 posted on 07/02/2009 8:00:32 AM PDT by DNME (How much food is in your house? How much water?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.
My Favorite


33 posted on 07/02/2009 8:21:43 AM PDT by 11th Commandment (Proud Member of the DHS radical list since Jan 20, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

35 posted on 07/02/2009 8:55:05 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (Sarah Palin: Iron Lady of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.
...and her uneven performance as a national figure this year...

Huh?

-PJ

36 posted on 07/02/2009 9:00:56 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (This just in... Voting Republican is a Terrorist act!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

What I like is she hasn’t so far even acknowledged the latest nonsense (VF article and ensuing brouhaha). She’s remaining stoic and focused and allowing her supporters (us) to fight in the trenches——she’s too many other more important things to be concern with than to get into this mud ring.....let me do it for her!!!


39 posted on 07/02/2009 10:06:25 AM PDT by Obushma (Obama=Bush 3rd Term!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Al B.

My GOD, is she gorgeous!!! Knew that already, of course, but those pics just confirm it even more.


43 posted on 07/02/2009 12:29:01 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Impeach President Soros!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abbeville Conservative; sleepwalker; Roses0508; feedback doctor; LibLieSlayer; ...

Palin PING!

Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.

44 posted on 07/02/2009 4:27:54 PM PDT by SolidWood (Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson