Posted on 06/22/2009 5:29:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
“It could have been a lot worse.”
So said Los Angeles Police Department Assistant Chief Earl Paysinger of the downtown L.A. melee that followed the Lakers’ victory over the Orlando Magic last Sunday. If that’s the standard the LAPD is shooting for these days, the city is in big, big trouble. By the time the last of the Lakers’ “fans” were cleared from the streets that night, eight police officers had been injured, three businesses looted, and several cars and transit buses vandalized, all broadcast live from television news helicopters.
You just knew there was a problem with LAPD’s response when the ACLU approved of it. Attorney Carol Sobel, who represented plaintiffs who sued the LAPD after the 2007 May Day melee at L.A.’s MacArthur Park, told the Los Angeles Times that the LAPD had learned from its mistakes. “They didn’t come out in all their riot gear and I think that helped,” Sobel said. “You saw the line officers and it created a different dynamic. They were able to disperse people and do it in a less confrontational manner. They had a presence but they moved out people without the level of confrontation that existed in the past.”
Heavens, we wouldn’t want to be “confrontational” with anyone looting a store or vandalizing a bus, would we? Perish the thought!
Expressing a dissenting view was Richard Torres, 29. Torres owns a vintage shoe store a few blocks from the Staples Center, and when he saw on television that trouble was brewing after the game he headed downtown. When he arrived at his store he found it had been trashed and that nearly all of his $140,000 in inventory had been looted. Some of the shoes had been set on fire in the street in front of the store. One might speculate that Mr. Torres and the others who had their stores pillaged wish the police had been just a bit more confrontational.
But yes, it could indeed have been worse. As riots go, it was small potatoes. But that’s hardly cause to characterize as a triumph what was in reality an embarrassment for the LAPD. “In their Monday morning analysis,” said the Los Angeles Times, “police commanders declared the [non-confrontational] approach a success, limiting injuries and property damage, and showing the public that the department could restrain the use of force.”
Sorry, but I’m not buying it. And neither should you, because no matter how Assistant Chief Paysinger and the rest of the brass tried to spin it in the press, everyone in the LAPD, from Chief William Bratton down to the greenest rookie, knows we got caught with our pants down that night.
But why were we so unprepared? There are three answers, all of them related to one another: poor planning, timidity, and lack of leadership in the upper ranks of the LAPD. First, as to the planning, the Lakers’ playoff schedule was known for weeks in advance, giving LAPD commanders ample time to deploy sufficient officers to deal with any trouble that might have followed a Laker victory or defeat. All 21 patrol divisions were told to staff heavily in the final week of the deployment period that ended on June 20. Incredibly, very few of those additional officers were pre-deployed downtown for what turned out to be the final Laker game on June 14. When the trouble began, the officers on hand were overmatched, and reinforcements had to be brought in from the far corners of the city. Once they arrived, there was a lack of coordination that might have been avoided had they been assembled prior to the game’s end.
Even more inexcusable is the fact that the officers most adept at crowd control (i.e., those assigned to the elite Metropolitan Division) were all given the day off on June 14. Metropolitan Division supervisors had suggested they change their schedule so as to be available in the event of a Laker victory Sunday, but the offer was declined at a higher level of the chain of command. This brings us to the timidity factor. Recall that it was Metropolitan Division officers who were involved in the May Day incident of 2007 (discussed here and here). A deputy chief was sacked in the wake of that incident, and despite the extensive training those officers have received in the two years since, some LAPD commanders are still reluctant to deploy them in those situations they are best trained to handle. Believe it or not, there are some in the highest ranks of the LAPD who would rather see stores looted and cars vandalized than see their own careers jeopardized by an incident that might in any way resemble what happened in MacArthur Park two years ago.
Such is the dearth of true leadership in the current Los Angeles Police Department, where experience behind a desk is more highly prized than actual police work when it comes time to evaluate candidates for promotion. Only a handful of those at the rank of captain and higher in the LAPD have the experience and leadership skills required to handle the kind of rapidly evolving situation as was seen near the Staples Center on June 14. None of them were there that night, as was evident from the poor performance shown to the world on television.
This takes nothing away from the officers who were there to face down those labeled by Chief Bratton as the “knuckleheads” responsible for the trouble. Of the patrol officers who did respond to Sunday’s melee, few had had any meaningful crowd control training, and almost none had had any real-world experience on a skirmish line trying to move a hostile crowd. And it’s impossible for a cop on a skirmish line or a sergeant or lieutenant standing behind it to have an overall picture of what’s occurring in the surrounding neighborhood. Whoever was in charge that night failed to react and deploy officers so as to prevent splinter groups from doing the damage they did. Thus we were left with the sight of a line of helmeted officers blocking an empty street and waiting for direction even as stores were being looted a few blocks away. Bratton and his underlings called it a success, but now you know better.
Yes, it could have been worse. But it could have been — and should have been — a whole lot better.
Obama supporters?
will any of the NBA millionaires be sending checks for repairs?
1) Who?
2) We'll never know.
3) I recall no rioting here ever over sports championships. There was a time when they were *expected*.
The Knicks won the NBA championship in 1970 and 1973 if I recall ( during the time of Walt Frazier, Earl Monroe, Bill Bradley, Dav e Debuschere and Willis Reed ).
Were there any riots then ?
The news acts as though this riot was unusual, and not even predictable. Just google “championship” and “riot” and you get 818,000 hits. Anyone with 1/2 a brain could have predicted a riot. It’s chic! You can’t be proud of your team unless you break windows, burn a few cars, and loot your local store.
Looting and violence when a black man is beat down by cops. Looting and violence when black men excel. Go figure.
Yet another reason to be prepared to defend your own home, family, or business. Police commanders will NOT allow their officers to use deadly force against rioters to protect you. The rioters know this, so they know they can act with impunity.
OTOH, they will avoid armed neighborhoods where they can be sure that homeowners WILL open fire in order to protect themselves and their families.
Rodney King, the May Day event, the hard core leftists running the show have all had the desired effect on the LAPD. Now innocents suffer because the ACLU is calling the shots and their only concern is the criminals. So if I was an LA oficer, I would hold back too. Why put yourself through the grind, find yourself on national tv unfavorably, jeopardize your career and family by actually trying to enforce the law? Now if you are in LA and need a cop, just call the ACLU. The cops have the day off and are enjoying the down time.
You just know that in every major city there are packs of vicious jackals looking for an excuse-any excuse to raise hell and steal other peoples property.
Geez, everybody knows that the proper way to celebrate a championship season is to break windows and take stuff!
< /sarc >
I think there would have been looting and violence after the last election if a black man had won
Who truly makes the decisions about this? The Police or the Mayor?
Who does the LAPD chief answer to? Mayor or City Council?
There is a lack of leadership and common sense with Mayor Tony Villa. Despite his agitating constantly for La Raza when he attended UCLA, he is a basic coward, IMO.
How they manage to recruit any new officers to serve in Los Angeles is beyond me. It is sliding into uncontrolled hell every day.
NO. I was working at a club in NYC at the time, and cops from the 19th precinct were regulars. They commented about a few drunken misbehavior arrests and a lot of just plain drunken celebrations, but no looting or violence.
Of course, that was the East Side, but I don't recall any bad news from the 'hoods either.
The Steelers win the Super Bowl and the Penguins win the Stanley Cup. NO RIOTS IN PITTSBURGH! At least none were reported.
These clowns are disgracing our country. Looking for a quick opportunity to steal.
Looters will rarely step over the dead body of a fellow looter to get more stuff.
With Mayor Giuliani and now Mayor Bloomberg, I am willing to bet that there would be no riots in New York City.
A lot of people don’t know that — but NYC is one of the safest big cities in the USA today.
I thought rioting was in response to centuries of oppression by the evil racist society. I guess not. Looks like the rioting was just something they enjoy doing, knowing that no one will stop them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.