Posted on 05/28/2009 2:26:51 PM PDT by LSUfan
Against the backdrop of President Obama's insistence on proceeding with closing the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility despite rising opposition from American citizens and their elected representatives, the Center for Security Policy (CSP) has announced the release of the latest in its Occasional Paper Series, Keep Gitmo Going: The case for retaining the vital detention and interrogation facility at Guantánamo Bay.
The white paper identifies the national security, public safety, and legal and economic challenges associated with closing Guantánamo and transferring detainees to the United States or to foreign custody.
Anywhere from 10-20 percent of the nearly 500 detainees released from Guantanamo have returned to the battlefield in some capacity. These were the "benign" detainees, one can only imagine the rate of recidivism of the 240 hardened terrorists still detained at Guantánamo.
Among those still held at Guantánamo are: Khaled Sheikh Mohammad, the self-confessed mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and the murder of Daniel Pearl; Ramzi Bin al-Shibh, a key facilitator of the 9/11 attacks and lead operative in a plot to crash aircaft into Heathrow Airport; and Abdal al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the mastermind behind the USS Cole bombing in 2002.
The transfer of such detainees to facilities within the United States will raise the risk of a terrorist attack on American soil. The facility at Guantánamo was chosen because it was the most secure location at which to house detainees, and therefore better ensure the safety of the American public.. There are multiple levels of security that need to be addressed before a detainee could be transferred to a facility within the United States. As the paper indicates:
You can't commingle them [Guantánamo detainees] with military detainees, so you'd have to set up a separate wing or clear out the facility...[a]nd you would have to address secondary and tertiary [security] concerns within the town, the county and the state..."- Charles "Cully" Stimson, former Deputy Assistant Defense Secretary for Detainee Affairs (Dan Ephron, "The Gitmo Dilemma," Newsweek, Nov. 7, 2008)
The paper goes on to note that the potential release of detainees into the United States also presents troubling legal questions:
With respect to the attempt to release up to 17 terrorist-trained Uighurs (Chinese Muslims) into the United States:
In 2005, Congress amended Section 1182 of Title 8, United States Code, to provide that an alien is "inadmissible" to the United States if s/he has "engaged in a terrorist activity"; "is a member of a terrorist organization"; or "has received military-type training...from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization." Because the Uighur detainees in question are affiliated with the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, an al-Qaeda offshoot formally designated by the United States as a terrorist organization, their transfer into the U.S. would violate several provisions of the foregoing statute - as would the transfer of other Guantánamo detainees for similar reasons.
With respect to trying detainees in civilian courts:
Because these detainees were captured during the course of battlefield hostilities, the government's case against them necessarily includes evidence that is classified, circumstantial, or otherwise acquired in ways that might make it inadmissible in an American civilian court. The U.S. government would therefore be forced to make an impossible decision: either disclose the evidence in full, which would in turn involve disclosure of military and intelligence sources and methods, or decline to disclose such evidence, and risk the release of the detainees as a result.
For additional information on the closing of Guantanamo, visit the Coalition for Terror-Free Communities website, at: www.terrorfreecommunities.org. It is regularly updated with the latest news, reports, legislation and analyses of information related to the risks associated with the closure of Guantanamo and transfer of detainees to the United States.
http://204.96.138.161/upload/wysiwyg/center%20publication%20pdfs/Kimball%20&%20Lerner%20-%20Keep%20Gitmo%20Going%20FINAL.pdf
http://204.96.138.161/upload/wysiwyg/center%20publication%20pdfs/Kimball%20&%20Lerner%20-%20Keep%20Gitmo%20Going%20FINAL.pdf
What folks are missing about bringing the terrorists to US mainland prisons in not the threat of escape. The entire area around any of these facilities, schools, hospitals, any large gathering of people, becomes a target.
Think Beslan school hostage crisis
The white paper identifies the national security, public safety, and legal and economic challenges associated with closing Guantanamo and transferring detainees to the United States or to foreign custody. Anywhere from 10-20 percent of the nearly 500 detainees released from Guantanamo have returned to the battlefield in some capacity. These were the "benign" detainees, one can only imagine the rate of recidivism of the 240 hardened terrorists still detained at Guantanamo. Among those still held at Guantánamo are: Khaled Sheikh Mohammad, the self-confessed mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and the murder of Daniel Pearl; Ramzi Bin al-Shibh, a key facilitator of the 9/11 attacks and lead operative in a plot to crash aircaft into Heathrow Airport; and Abdal al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the mastermind behind the USS Cole bombing in 2002.
I have never seen addressed or discussed what would happen if they are tried, convicted and subsequently released after their term of conviction. They would by law be released to the general population,since no other countries want them. If I am missing something here, please let me know.
Thanks
Depends on how long a term. Basically, I don’t think they should be transferred to US prisons; I also don’t think they should be released from Gitmo. If Gitmo is to be closed, then they should be deported to their countries of origin, preferably to stand trials for terrorism there. Or maybe we can send them all on the same plane back to some Muzzie hell-hole, the crew can bail (or the whole thing can be automated), the movie screen would kick on, a simulated face of Satan would appear, and tell them, in various languages, “Hijack this, mofos.”
Hopefully, Gitmo will become a giant issue that Obama will try to shovel on us like the contents of a s**t wagon! It’s one thing for a naive amatuer politician to say stupid stuff on the campaign trail to appeal to the intellectually challenged among us, it’s another thing to try to shovel it down our throats in the face of rising opposition.
The folks at Gitmo weren’t sent there for singing off-key in the choir. These are some of the most dangerous muzzie murderers of the bunch and, not only can they not be brought to the US, they can’t be sent anywhere else.
Recent history has proven that every single terrorist released from Gitmo to date, EVERY SINGLE ONE, has returned to their terrorist organization and resumed the fight to kill more Americans and innocent people.
Who has (pier) reviewed the Occasional Papers prior to their release?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.