Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What If Arnold Had Seized the Moment? ( and "what if" we had elected McClintock! )
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ^ | MAY 23, 2009 | BILL WHALEN

Posted on 05/23/2009 7:01:21 AM PDT by kellynla

While politicians debate whether this week's rejection of various spending initiatives in California marks the beginning of an antitax insurgency, I can't help but wonder what might have been had Arnold Schwarzenegger immediately pushed for reform upon taking office in 2003.

The Arnold of the state's recall election was the Barack Obama of the 2008 presidential election. He was a man of wealth and privilege, restyled as a populist outsider and overhyped by a fawning media, who came into office with a window of opportunity to achieve most anything his heart desired. For Mr. Schwarzenegger, that window remained open for about a year.

Sacramento Democrats recognized that taking on the celebrity governor was a fight they would lose. But Mr. Schwarzenegger failed to seize the opportunity. He needed to make entrenched lawmakers an offer: Either work with him on budget and government reform so everyone can have a nice bipartisan bill-signing, or expect a knock-out fight at the polls over a set of ballot initiatives.

Had he done so, he might have gotten some of the good ideas that the state needs -- such as setting up a serious rainy-day fund and creating an honest spending cap -- enacted into law.

Would the Democrats who control California's legislature have rolled over that easily? We'll never know, but the threat of taking the issue to the voters is how the governor got workers' compensation reform through the legislature within six months of taking office.

Mr. Schwarzenegger did offer a plan to revamp state government during his honeymoon phase in 2004. But his approach -- the "California Performance Review," or CPR -- was a metaphor for his political failure. It involved a 275-member task force that produced a 2,500-page proposal.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: cpr; mcclintock; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
RINOld is just another



And the only difference in this clown and the last one we had for governor is his party affiliation...

1 posted on 05/23/2009 7:01:21 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; Ernest_at_the_Beach; NormsRevenge

ping


2 posted on 05/23/2009 7:02:00 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Where are all those FReepers who supported this clown in 2003?

Back at the DU I guess...


3 posted on 05/23/2009 7:06:47 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Has Hugh Hewitt or other California conservative radio hosts ever expressed any regret for supporting Schwarzenegger over the conservative choice?

Hewitt's no RINO but I knew he was wrong about Schwarzenegger from the beginning! His idea was that only a moderate could win, and we just had to get as many Republicans elected as possible.

The result shows how dangerous such thinking can be.
4 posted on 05/23/2009 7:29:33 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

It will be a joy to see this Austrian creep slink off into the sunset with his repulsive vampire wife. I despise both of them, as I despise the entire Kennedy family.


5 posted on 05/23/2009 7:30:43 AM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The problem isn’t his politics, but his personality. Arnold Schwarzenegger isn’t a badass, he just plays one in the movies. He’s really a very nice guy - too nice for politics. He wants to be liked, and is unhappy when he’s not.

This is what happens when someone runs for the higher offices without experience. If he’d come up through the ranks he’d have either grown a thicker skin or been run out of the game altogether.


6 posted on 05/23/2009 7:32:25 AM PDT by Mountain Troll (Barak Obama - just another affirmative action government hire living in public housing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreepShop1
Here ya go, your very own picture of Skeletor:


7 posted on 05/23/2009 7:37:26 AM PDT by Lizavetta (Politicians: When they're not lying, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

..the same emotionalism that was Arnold fever mutated into Obamalaria a few years later...


8 posted on 05/23/2009 7:53:37 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner
I will apologize for voting for Arnold when you apologize for voting for GWB, who has absolutely done more damage to the GOP than Arnold. Arnold's Democrat-lite is at least contained in a state that is culturally isolated from the rest of the country. Bush and his free pills and bail-outs made it impossible for us to have a distinction from the other side.

McClintock could never have been elected in California. It isn't his policies; the guy is just not cool. You have to be cool to get elected here. Reagan was cool. Even Pete Wilson had a little sumptin sumptin...but McClintock is like that mean neighbor who keep your ball when it goes over the fence and lands in his yard. He comes off like an old Crab-Ass.

9 posted on 05/23/2009 8:02:38 AM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Troll
This is what happens when someone runs for the higher offices without experience. If he’d come up through the ranks he’d have either grown a thicker skin or been run out of the game altogether.

You are right. Arnold is just way over his head so he treats his political work the way he has approached his life; simply as a popularity contest.

As for despising him, or his wife, or anyone for that matter, hate is not a winning strategy. Listen to how the Cheney haters sound. We don't want to be them.

10 posted on 05/23/2009 8:07:01 AM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zevonismymuse

..it would be interesting to know who you voted for president in ‘00 and ‘04...


11 posted on 05/23/2009 8:11:36 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I knew Ahnold was trouble when he was against closing the borders and building a fence. The state is overrun with illegals who consume more tax dollars than they bring in. The pro illegal pro cheap labor WSJ conveniently forgets to mention this fact.
12 posted on 05/23/2009 8:12:45 AM PDT by RedStateGuyTrappedinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Had he done so, he might have gotten some of the good ideas that the state needs -- such as setting up a serious rainy-day fund and creating an honest spending cap -- enacted into law.

There WAS a spending cap and had been for over twenty years, the Gann Spending Limits passed soon after Proposition 13. Arnold got rid of them in his first set of ballot initiatives, Propositions 57 & 58. Then he went to Wall Street to borrow $15 billion, thus paying off the bond houses that provided the seed money for his campaign and costing California a cool half billion unnecessarily because he chose not to use California bond houses.

When are these idiots at the Wall Street Journal going to get it? ARNOLD WAS PART OF A MASSIVE GLOBALIST SCAM, PERPETRATED FROM WALL STREET.

13 posted on 05/23/2009 8:40:51 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
It wasn't Arnold's core values that got him elected. It was his celebrity status.
14 posted on 05/23/2009 8:42:18 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zevonismymuse
McClintock could never have been elected in California.

Not true. The Gallup numbers of the late recall election show clearly that it was the conservative defection to Arnold out of fear of Bustamante that kept Tom from winning the recall.

It is NOT impossible for a conservative to win in California. Even after a completely incompetent campaign, Simon came within 360,000 votes of beating Davis.

15 posted on 05/23/2009 8:45:14 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Troll
This is what happens when someone runs for the higher offices without experience. If he’d come up through the ranks he’d have either grown a thicker skin or been run out of the game altogether.

Good thing you weren't around when George Washington was alive.

16 posted on 05/23/2009 8:45:36 AM PDT by 60Gunner (It's RINO Season!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner
..it would be interesting to know who you voted for president in ‘00 and ‘04...

I voted for Bush both times but I did so reluctantly, just as I reluctantly voted for McCain in the last election. The point I was making is that folks who voted for Bush should be careful about criticizing those of us who voted for Arnold. Bush was no conservative and I NEVER voted for him or McCain in the primary. Once we get to the general election I work within the realms of reality and vote for who will destroy freedom more slowly.

17 posted on 05/23/2009 8:47:13 AM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
It is NOT impossible for a conservative to win in California

You mis-characterize what I was saying...I did not say a conservative can't win; I said an uncool conservative can't win. I made the point it is possible to be cool and conservative and I gave two examples. I said McClintock can't win because he comes off as a very uncool old crab-ass.

18 posted on 05/23/2009 8:51:10 AM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Where are all those FReepers who supported this clown in 2003?

I'll fess up - I was one who thought Arnold would be good for the GOP. I thought he was a true fiscal conservative, based upon his statements about Reagan making him a Republican, his coming from a socialist country, and his financial prowess. I also thought he would campaign for Bush in 2004, and possibly help make California competetive again for Republicans.

I obviously underestimated the influence of his wife, and how much of a whimp he would turn out to be in facing the Democrat legislature. His poor performance in getting his initiatives passed - this from a guy who should be the ultimate pitchman - was just sad.

Stupid me.

19 posted on 05/23/2009 8:51:19 AM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne

Just curious...did you vote for him in 2006 too?


20 posted on 05/23/2009 9:00:22 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson