Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is not the business of the federal government.
1 posted on 05/19/2009 12:06:36 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: reaganaut1

Still waiting for my cable bill to drop ... how dumb are people anyway.


2 posted on 05/19/2009 12:07:50 PM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Not needed with the internet/libraries/etc... The nutrition in fast food is easy to find.

Google “mcdonald’s big mac nutrition”

http://caloriecount.about.com/calories-big-mac-i21111


5 posted on 05/19/2009 12:12:19 PM PDT by Brookhaven (Democrats = The National Socialists Party USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

More stupidity.

Those who care about their weight, know what are reasonable choices at fast food places.

Those who don’t care about their weight, would ignore labels.

What’s the point?


6 posted on 05/19/2009 12:12:27 PM PDT by brownsfan (Kool aid comes in two new flavors: Hope and Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Doesn’t Article VII Section VI of the U.S. Constitution cover federal regulation of fast food restaurants? /s

One of these days they’ll come up with a fingernail criteria for how long our nails can be.

This federal government is soooo outside the Founder’s box.


7 posted on 05/19/2009 12:12:59 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

It should be up to the private business to post this. If enough consumers stop eating at their restaurants because they do not provide the nutritional information than they are already punished. Common sense.


8 posted on 05/19/2009 12:13:31 PM PDT by Cheap_Hessian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

No, it isn’t. Don’t forget though how the left loves to label and categorize.


9 posted on 05/19/2009 12:14:18 PM PDT by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

EVERYTHING is the bailiwick of the FedZilla.

This concerns citizens health, as such, a prime responsibility of the state.

In the near future, one could envision someone over their weight being denied an item that exceeds their recommended caloric count for their meal. Hooked up to a health DB, the info could be immediately downloaded to the eatery in question, and the sensible choice chosen for that individual.


11 posted on 05/19/2009 12:14:49 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Yeah, we need to know that a burger and fries is not carrot sticks and frogurt...these idiots...what happened to “the worst economy since the Great Depression” mantra these birdbrains rammed down our throats, now they want business costs to go through the roof, do they think we won’t end up paying more??? Geez...I am just about ready to close up my little business, send everyone packing and go fishing for a living...this is insane...


12 posted on 05/19/2009 12:14:58 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

True. Some states and cities have such laws in place already.


15 posted on 05/19/2009 12:15:20 PM PDT by ex91B10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

WTF? Every fast food place into which I go already posts this information. Why is this bill even being proposed?


16 posted on 05/19/2009 12:15:39 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Health advocates believe that when people see the amount of calories, fat and salt in meals before they order them, they will gravitate to more healthful selections.

Another useless law that pushes up prices and adds no value.

The vast majority of people know which items on the menu are healthier and which are deadly if consumed on a frequent bases.

People who care also know that if they want to they can decrease the number of calories in any given meal simply by not eating the bread.

They can reduce sodium by ordering the fries with out salt, the sandwich without pickles and catsup.

Anyone who cares know what to order.

Nannys of the world: go away and leave us in peace. We can take care of ourselves.

17 posted on 05/19/2009 12:18:39 PM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Two federal lawmakers have introduced legislation to require fast-food and other chain restaurants to post calories on menu boards and food display tags. The chains also would have to put information about calories, fats, carbohydrates and salt on printed menus.

And if there is room they can also squeeze on the price in small type.

I was at a fast food drive through today. I was thinking about ordering a milkshake too, but the menu board was already so crowded with everything that I couldn't find it by the time I finished the rest of my order. I probably didn't need it anyway.

18 posted on 05/19/2009 12:19:30 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (No free man bows to a foreign king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Where is the clause in the Constitution that says Congress shall protect us from what we eat?

These morons have got to go!


20 posted on 05/19/2009 12:21:55 PM PDT by CarmichaelPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I’m against a law requiring this, but I sure would enjoy it if more restaurants did this voluntarily. I avoid a lot of places because unless I go searching around on the internet, I don’t have any idea how many calories there are in the meal. It would be awesome to have that right there on the menu. But, once again, it’s not the government’s responsibility to require something like that. Should be up to the businesses themselves.


21 posted on 05/19/2009 12:22:29 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

This is such a lie.
Just about every fast food or restaurant we eat at will gladly give you the nutritional information off their website as a .pdf or excel spreadsheet.
I wish a creative Republican would put an amendment into this bill that the charges for increased food prices from menu changes will be paid for from the salaries of Democratic House Leadership.


23 posted on 05/19/2009 12:23:09 PM PDT by WoodstockCat (General Honore: "The storm gets a vote... We're not stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Actually I favor this bill. This isn't an issue of the government regulating what is sold or for how much. This is government ensuring that people have a reasonable ability to make smart decisions. The costs to the food industry are minimal and the ability for people to eat healthier worth quite a lot.

I know I would like to know how many calories are in meals at places I go to. Sure, I could usually look it up on-line before I go for some places but how often will I do that? And many places don't offer that But when I go to Olive Garden or Outback I'd like to be able to have a menu that tells me exactly what it is I'm consuming.

Using government to help people empower themselves is, IMO, a legitimate use. It's when the government starts making those choices or pushing people one way or the other that bothers me.

We still like the FDA to make sure our meat is safe right? And to inspect the facilities food is processed/stored at right? There is little difference here.

24 posted on 05/19/2009 12:23:35 PM PDT by AirForceGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

How did the citizenry survive before the government controlled every aspect of their lives? How will the citizenry survive when the air we breathe is taxed for our own good?


25 posted on 05/19/2009 12:25:02 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Harkin labeled himself as a moron years ago.
27 posted on 05/19/2009 12:25:38 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

“This is not the business of the federal government.”

And when did that ever stop the government.


28 posted on 05/19/2009 12:25:58 PM PDT by edcoil (IF CA rolls pollution standards back to 1990 levels, lets roll CA spending back as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

What a waste of their time and OUR money.


29 posted on 05/19/2009 12:26:50 PM PDT by malia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson