Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Forced Chrysler's Creditors to Blink
Wall Street Journal ^ | May 11, 2009 | Neil King Jr. and Jeffrey McCracken

Posted on 05/11/2009 6:53:19 AM PDT by reaganaut1

...

Pulling a trick from the hedge-fund playbook, the government used its leverage as the sole willing lender to Chrysler, either in bankruptcy court or out, to extract deep concessions from some of the country's biggest banks.

The results of these hardball tactics were on display Friday, as the last resisters of a deal to slash the value of Chrysler debt abandoned their effort to fight it in bankruptcy court. That raised the chances for a relatively swift transit through Chapter 11, producing a new Chrysler 55%-owned by a trust for union retirees, 35% by Fiat SpA -- which hasn't even been a Chrysler creditor -- and not at all by the senior secured lenders.

That conclusion would upend a longstanding tradition concerning rights in a bankruptcy: Senior secured lenders usually get paid in full before lower-priority creditors get anything. Not this time.

The White House's role in restructuring Chrysler has sent a shudder through the community of lawyers and lenders in the field of bankruptcy and corporate workouts. Critics complain that the administration has violated a bedrock principle of American capitalism and unfairly demonized financial firms that are vital to the functioning of the economy and its eventual recovery.

Administration officials reply that the Chrysler crisis required bold action. While Chrysler's suppliers, dealers and unionized workers are critical to its survival -- and so is Fiat, which will contribute high-efficiency engines and foreign distribution -- the creditors were expendable.

"You don't need banks and bondholders to make cars," said one administration official.

The administration could exert such leverage because it was convinced big banks were too tarnished in the public eye to put up a fight. They risked being blamed for Chrysler's demise.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Michigan; US: New York
KEYWORDS: chrysler; creditors; michigan; newyork; obama; ruleoflaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
'"You don't need banks and bondholders to make cars," said one administration official.' So the automakers and other companies will never need to borrow money in the future from private investors?

If Obama had demanded equal concessions from the UAW, what was it going to do, go on strike? The country could survive just fine without Chrysler. This was a naked political payoff by a Chicago thug.

1 posted on 05/11/2009 6:53:19 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Call it what it is - pure fascism.


2 posted on 05/11/2009 6:58:54 AM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

Boycott Chrysler products.


3 posted on 05/11/2009 7:02:05 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The UAW paid for Obama’s ‘hope’.


4 posted on 05/11/2009 7:02:18 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton
"You don't need banks and bondholders to make cars," said one administration official. Workers, supppliers, Taxes paid by who? Banks and Bondholders.

Anyone think a US company will be able to raise any money? Plenty of workers.

5 posted on 05/11/2009 7:02:41 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"You don't need banks and bondholders to make cars,"

We'll see about that.

6 posted on 05/11/2009 7:03:38 AM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Pulling a trick from the hedge-fund TOTALITARIANS playbook

Stupid MSM. They can't even do the research to get the story right.

7 posted on 05/11/2009 7:05:42 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

That’s a pretty easy one.
Been doing that for over 43 years.

Now, I may have to start boycotting GM products and go back to Toyota.


8 posted on 05/11/2009 7:05:47 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

It is amazing the level of ignorance displayed by the administration.

And the number of laws they are breaking.


9 posted on 05/11/2009 7:06:43 AM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patton
Call it what it is - pure fascism.

Exactly right.

For decades, I've had Leftists tell me that Hitler was a right-wing extremist -- afterall, he had a lot of support from German industrialists! Why would powerful industrialists support Hitler, if Hitler was actually a socialist???

In reality, it's not that hard to figure out the economics of fascism.

10 posted on 05/11/2009 7:06:44 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (American Revolution II -- overdue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

We are in for a rough ride, I think.


11 posted on 05/11/2009 7:10:29 AM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: patton

It is amazing the level of ignorance displayed by the administration.

And the number of laws they are breaking.”

It’s not ignorance. This is a deliberate, socialist blitzkrieg on America. And it is being executed exactly according to plan.

As for breaking the laws, the Rule of Law is dead. It is clear that our government no longer feels itself bound by any laws or restraints of any kind. As you would have in a fascist regime.


12 posted on 05/11/2009 7:10:47 AM PDT by henkster (The GOP is housebroken window-dressing displayed to portray the fiction of a Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: patton
Heil Obama!
[Might as well get in practice; a different but equivalent phrase will soon be mandatory.]
13 posted on 05/11/2009 7:12:17 AM PDT by TurtleUp (Turtle up: cancel optional spending until 2012, and boycott TARP/stimulus companies forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: henkster

“It is clear that our government no longer feels itself bound by any laws or restraints of any kind. “

That has been true for a while now - it has just become more obvious to the casual observer recently.


14 posted on 05/11/2009 7:14:15 AM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TurtleUp

“On the 73rd day I will rest.”

I am at a loss for words.


15 posted on 05/11/2009 7:15:38 AM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

“Now, I may have to start boycotting GM products and go back to Toyota.”

I have been since 1985, Honda and more recently, BMW are my vehicles of choice.


16 posted on 05/11/2009 7:21:00 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Smile you're on Janet's Candid Camera!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The Obama Administration took Chryslers slogan “Just Ram It” to heart and rammed it up the investors rears.


17 posted on 05/11/2009 7:23:43 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“Boycott Chrysler products.”

Absolutely. Given the way this was handled, I don’t think I’d drive one if someone gave it to me for free. And, I will be avoiding rental car agencies that use them. If there were a national appeal for money to help retirees that are dependent upon pension money from Chrysler, and it was voluntary, I would certainly give to help these people. On the other hand, having the bedrock principles of our economy thrown away and manipulated so that a union can have ownership of a company that they helped to destroy economically is disgusting, and I will not under any circumstances buy a Fiat or Chrysler car. My guess is that if they survive at all it will be because they sell to Europe and other countries.


18 posted on 05/11/2009 7:24:14 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

19 posted on 05/11/2009 7:25:03 AM PDT by paulycy (BEWARE the LIBERAL/MEDIA Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Fuhrer Of Hopey-Changey


20 posted on 05/11/2009 7:29:11 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were a clueless idiot, and suppose you were Barack Obama; but I repeat myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson