Fearfully and wonderfully made ping!
of course, it is painfully obvious to all but the most stridently mililtant worshippers at the altar of darwin, that God is behind all of this...
bet they hate it when science confirms more of God’s handiwork.
Ignorance is bliss.
All evidence, properly evaluated, confirms creation.
I didn’t see the part where the scientists who conducted the research confirmed that the fruit flies didn’t evolve.
How many fruit flies had to die for this testing? We must protect the little fruit fly and banish all fruit fly testing.
I haven’t read it. My prediction: a scientific study done by a real scientist, interpreted by the ICR to a conclusion that does not follow the real scientist’s conclusions.
Fools.
Because the technology to do this wasn't previously available.
Notably, most of the candidate transcripts identified were unexpected based on previous mutational analyses of the traits.2 Thus, most of the genetic organization and activity they observed was not predicted to be there by the evolution-through-mutation story!
They were not observed using the old technology or organized according to the new model.
When the new genomics models appear, poor Brian is going to have to keep re-writing his argument.
>>Gene Construction Confirms Creation
by Brian Thomas, M.S.* <<
I believe this is the same gentleman who wrote that finding proto-feathers on dinosaurs and said that made it harder to say to birds descended from dinosaurs...