Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gene Construction Confirms Creation
ICR ^ | April 17, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 04/17/2009 7:59:08 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
The Brian Thomas M.S.*/ICR method of scientific research:
1. Read articles that have been recently published by major scientific journals.
2. Claim that sad articles support creation without performing any original research.
3. ???
4. Profit! Special creation is proven!
21 posted on 04/17/2009 8:47:33 AM PDT by Boxen (There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pox

Why close your eyes? The scientific mind looks at ALL possibilities, and the theory that our universe and everything in it is an artifact created by a supernatural Being outside of time and space is one possibility. Although this Being can never be the object of direct scientific study, His Existence and Nature can be examined on a secondhand basis through examination of the Artifact (the universe).

Don’t be misled by the notion that only those things that can be observed with the senses are real. This is a unprovable and unscientific belief, not a demonstrable fact. And, since we’re basing our wordviews on belief anyway, why not believe in God?


22 posted on 04/17/2009 8:49:12 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

You just gotta have faith!


23 posted on 04/17/2009 8:53:46 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

PS That’s millions of generations, in which the fruit flies are shocked, exposed to chemicals, X-rays, etc, all specifically designed to induce mutations. And yet, it either kills them, makes them sterile, or they remain fruitflies.


24 posted on 04/17/2009 8:54:42 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
"If Genesis mentioned DNA...But it's written in a fashion that is completely parallel with a Bronze Age understanding of the universe."

I'm sure "Bronze Age" folk would've been highly impressed had God used more acronyms in His revelations.

Fortunately for them, God is a better communicator than most. His description of the roles of man and woman in Genesis are timeless and enduring. While Moses' contemporaries might not have understood the details as do you and I, God's affirmation that when man leaves parents to cleave unto woman the result is 'one flesh' has quite naturally stood the test of time...and science.

A definition quite understandable to the relatively ignorant while not at all at odds with modern genetic research...divine revelation is a wonderful thing.

25 posted on 04/17/2009 8:56:25 AM PDT by BuddhaBrown (Path to enlightenment: Four right turns, then go straight until you see the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Faith is belief despite the absence of evidence. That certainly sums up creationism.


26 posted on 04/17/2009 8:57:12 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Unlikely that millions of years of evolution can be reproduced in a lab in a few decades.


27 posted on 04/17/2009 8:58:50 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

And we creationists would like to extend a hearty thank you to all the Evos who are generating endless reams of data (paid for by our tax dollars) that creation scientists then reinterpret to demonstrate A) Creation is TRUE and B) Evolution is FALSE.


28 posted on 04/17/2009 8:59:44 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

Speaking of faith, isn’t it curious that the Evos have never seen macroevolution take place, and yet they still believe it?


29 posted on 04/17/2009 9:02:41 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBrown
His description of the roles of man and woman in Genesis are timeless and enduring.

Perhaps, but divinely inspired?

Genesis' comments on relationships and social structure might well have been germane, but it's scientific worth is provably wrong if taken in a literal context.

30 posted on 04/17/2009 9:02:56 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
I've never personally observed the core of Neptune either.

But I'm pretty certain that we know it's most likely silicates and ice and not pixie dust and marshmallow cream.

31 posted on 04/17/2009 9:07:38 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Belief without proof (or at least compelling evidence) is fantasy based reality.

The best explanations for what we observe in our Universe, at this point in our history, obsoletes religion based beliefs no matter how you spin and twist them.

Rejecting or invalidating evolution does not immediately validate fantasy based religious beliefs, although the gutter garbage posted nonstop by GGG would insist such is the case. It is not an either/or situation.

The truth is, I have opened my eyes, and I choose not to follow with blind faith. I am not a drone. I have not simply rejected your point of view, but put that point of view in the lowest percentile of probability concerning our reality.

In the end, I have no quarrels with anyone believing what they please as long as they are not attempting to force me or mine to believe the same.


32 posted on 04/17/2009 9:09:19 AM PDT by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
"...it's scientific worth is provably wrong if taken in a literal context"

Are you suggesting there exists new scientific revelation that mom and dad's DNA do NOT combine into one unique 'flesh'?

33 posted on 04/17/2009 9:10:03 AM PDT by BuddhaBrown (Path to enlightenment: Four right turns, then go straight until you see the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

The first five books of the Bible (Torah) were dictated, letter by letter, to Moses by God.


34 posted on 04/17/2009 9:12:42 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBrown
Are you suggesting there exists new scientific revelation that mom and dad's DNA do NOT combine into one unique 'flesh'?

Knowledge of DNA is not required to know that males and females mate to produce offspring.

35 posted on 04/17/2009 9:18:01 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
The first five books of the Bible (Torah) were dictated, letter by letter, to Moses by God.

How do you know this?

36 posted on 04/17/2009 9:18:30 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pox
"I have no quarrels with anyone believing what they please as long as they are not attempting to force me or mine to believe the same."

In America, the theory of evolution is the only faith-based indoctrination which is mandated with any authority.

Fortunately, we are all free as you say 'in the end' to believe what we wish. Whether we are always free to express our differing faiths is another matter.

37 posted on 04/17/2009 9:24:06 AM PDT by BuddhaBrown (Path to enlightenment: Four right turns, then go straight until you see the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

The difference of course being that the creatures that are said to be evolving can be directly observed in nature, not to mention the lab. And yet, macro-evolution is not observed in either setting. Thus, evolution is a matter of faith, NOT SCIENCE.


38 posted on 04/17/2009 9:26:30 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner; GodGunsGuts
If Genesis mentioned DNA or microscopic organisms, I'd be intrigued.

If Genesis mentioned DNA or microorganisms, the words would not have any known translation. Those are modern words which, if a language had them thousands of years ago, would not have had any counterpart until now. And then, how would we know what they mean now?

Those words would be like the word *Selah* in the Psalms.

39 posted on 04/17/2009 9:29:01 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
And yet, macro-evolution is not observed in either setting

That's because it takes millions of years.

It's not faith, it's the most sound explanation we have for the diversity of life. If a better explanation comes along backed up by research, we will alter our perceptions. The same can't be said of creation science which is based on faith in ancient texts.

40 posted on 04/17/2009 9:31:23 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson