Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gulf war jitters (After Israel's attack on Iran)
United Press International ^ | April 14, 2009 | Arnaud De Borchgrave, UPI Editor at Large

Posted on 04/14/2009 12:52:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Gulf Cooperation Council members -- Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Oman -- are getting ready for what many now assume will be retaliation from Iran following Israeli bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities later this year.

Up and down the Persian Gulf, Patriot missile batteries have been quietly deployed around key oil installations. The Patriot system is designed to detect, target and then hit incoming missiles that may be no more than 10 to 20 feet long and flying at three to five times the speed of sound. Iran has hundreds of missiles and rockets.

There is also a steady traffic in and out of Washington of high-ranking GCC military and defense officials, including army, air force and navy chiefs. Gulf rulers are fearful Israel's new government, headed by the tough, uncompromising Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, will walk away from any possibility of a Palestinian solution. Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said as much when he made clear "we are no longer bound by the previous government's undertakings for the negotiation of a Palestinian state." The Annapolis accord of 2007 for a two-state solution? Didn't happen on our watch, said Israel's new governing team. Lieberman even wants to strip any rights from Arab Israelis who are disloyal to the Jewish state.

Undeterred, George Mitchell, the new super negotiator for a Middle East settlement, went back to the region for the third time since Barack Obama became president of the United States. He sees a glimmer of hope for a peace deal with Syria that would detach the ruling dictatorship from its close ties with Iran. But a Netanyahu government in Israel is not about to give up control of the Golan Heights it has occupied since the 1967 Six Day War.

While Iran may unclench its fist in words, as President Obama unclenched America's, no one in Israel, and very few in other countries, believe Iran's theocrats will relinquish the nuclear ambitions they have been working on secretly for the past quarter of a century. Netanyahu echoed near-unanimous Israeli feelings when he said an Iranian bomb, coupled with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's threats of destruction against the Jewish state, is an "existential crisis" that Israel cannot and will not ignore.

Israel's moderate President Shimon Peres added a stern warning. If forthcoming talks with Iran don't yield results, he admonished, "we'll strike." But, he added, this cannot be done without the United States. Israel's military intelligence chief, Amos Yadlin, told the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that the emergence of a nuclear arsenal in Iran is now "mainly dependent on a political decision."

The assumption among most GCC rulers is that Israel will launch bombers against some of Iran's 27 nuclear sites as soon as it becomes clear the mullahs won't agree to surrender their nuclear option at upcoming six-power talks. The United States and Iran will be at the same negotiating table -- along with China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany -- for the first time since the Iranian Revolution ousted the shah 30 years ago.

Iran's next presidential elections are scheduled for June 14, when Ahmadinejad may lose the presidency to a candidate judged by Western powers to be comparatively moderate. But the latest word from Iran watchers is that the supreme religious leader, Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, favors the re-election of his extremist protege. This would be another green light for the Netanyahu coalition government to order an attack.

Interestingly enough, not all the ruling Sunni families in the gulf are against an Israeli attempt to disrupt Iran's nuclear plans. Most feel threatened by nukes in the hands of a Shiite clerical regime that dreams of dominating the gulf, as the shah once did when Britain in 1968 gave up all its commitments east of Suez. In 1971, the shah seized three strategic islands near the Strait of Hormuz -- Abu Musa and Lesser and Greater Tunb -- that Britain had entrusted to the ruler of Abu Dhabi. The mullahs refused to return them -- and then militarized them with naval guns.

There is plenty of tinder up and down the gulf for a major conflagration throughout the region should Israel strike Iran. The mullahs with their revolutionary guards and far-flung intelligence services possess formidable asymmetrical retaliatory capabilities. They also have at their subversive disposal Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza coupled with a growing influence in the West Bank.

Morocco recently severed diplomatic relations with Iran after its agents were caught proselytizing against Sunni Islam and King Mohammed VI. Dubai, one of the seven emirates in the United Arab Emirates, has 400,000 Iranian residents -- including scores of undercover agents. Saudi Arabia's eastern province, where most its oil fields are located, as well as the world's largest offshore oil terminal at Ras Tanura and the kingdom's oil nerve center at Abqaiq, also has a large Shiite minority. And in the kingdom of Bahrain, headquarters for the U.S. 5th Fleet, a majority of the population is Shiite and subject to frequent agitation against the ruling Sunni family.

Qatar, which now enjoys the world's highest standard of living with a per capita income of $78,000, straddles the gulf fence with both ears to the ground, a somewhat ungainly posture but one that's deemed far more secure. The firebrand satellite television station al-Jazeera was created by Qatar's ruling al-Thani family and is headquartered in Doha, the capital. But the United States was also authorized to build a base in Qatar with one of the world's longest military runways. Qatar is forward headquarters for the Tampa-based Central Command headed by Gen. David Petraeus. For the past 15 years the charismatic Sheika Mozah bint Nasser Al Missned, the Qatari emir's wife, spearheaded an educational drive that brought several leading U.S. universities to establish branches in Qatar.

If attacked, Iran could also jeopardize an orderly U.S. military exit from neighboring Iraq in 2010. The two countries fought a war from 1980-1988 that killed about 1 million soldiers from both countries. Iran is influential in the western region of Afghanistan.

Oman, which faces Iran across the Strait of Hormuz, has always made good relations with Iran a top priority. But the prudent Omanis also have the gulf's best internal security system.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bho44; binyaminnetanyahu; energy; hillary; iran; israel; nuclearweapons; obama; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Comments?
1 posted on 04/14/2009 12:52:01 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities later this year.” Way to spill the beans UPI!


2 posted on 04/14/2009 12:58:09 PM PDT by enraged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I refuse to comment until my new and improved Teleprompter F-5000 series
arrives..."


3 posted on 04/14/2009 12:58:58 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Gulf rulers are fearful Israel's new government, headed by the tough, uncompromising Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, will walk away from any possibility of a Palestinian solution.

Israel is on a roll that needs to be maintained!

Kudos to the Prime Minister.

4 posted on 04/14/2009 12:59:14 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

> Comments?

Sure. Iran will be easier to deal with now than later. The longer Israel waits, the tougher it is going to be to make a decisive strike.

Of course, the experts in Israel’s military know this.


5 posted on 04/14/2009 12:59:35 PM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The NWO and $8 / gal gas in the US is on the NWO’s agenda....late summer. It’s needed to further socialism and the 0 agenda.


6 posted on 04/14/2009 12:59:45 PM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The National Terrorist Forecast Service calls for intermittent rocket storms followed by swarms of speedboats.

Nearby populations and shipping should take appropriate precautions.

The National Terrorist Forecast Service projects 3 days of severe activity, followed by more sporadic and localized terrorist events.


7 posted on 04/14/2009 12:59:55 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (If Liberals' GOAL was the Destruction of Western Civilization, would their behavior differ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The fact that a far left Israeli leader like Peres is threatening military action is clearly a sign that time is getting short now.


8 posted on 04/14/2009 1:01:11 PM PDT by Dave346
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If it’s true that Israel won’t strike without the approval of the US, then it won’t strike. BO will not approve that decision. But, I don’t believe that. Israel won’t have a choice other than to strike. It’s just a matter of time and opportunity now.


9 posted on 04/14/2009 1:04:10 PM PDT by Paco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

as soon as it becomes clear the mullahs won’t agree to surrender their nuclear option at upcoming six-power talks. The United States and Iran will be at the same negotiating table — along with China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany —

Since the North Koreans have already told the Six Power talks to go to hell, I see no reason for the Iranians to
suddenly become compliant.


10 posted on 04/14/2009 1:06:15 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Probably what Biden was talking about when he warned democrat donors Zero would face a challenge and they’d have to bear with Zero. But, which way they’d have to tolerate Zero, whether in support of action against Iran or abandoning Israel, Biden did not make clear.

Makes Obama’s obsequience before Saudi King more important.


11 posted on 04/14/2009 1:07:17 PM PDT by Gothmog (I fight for Xev)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet


For the dead and the living we must bear witness.
12 posted on 04/14/2009 1:08:07 PM PDT by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
But, he added, this cannot be done without the United States.

Which won't happen with an Obama White House.

13 posted on 04/14/2009 1:10:06 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

My husband suggested we should move to Israel last night....he loves Netanyahu .....


14 posted on 04/14/2009 1:10:44 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Say NO to the $10 Trillion Ransom to DC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Iran could also jeopardize an orderly U.S. military exit from neighboring Iraq in 2010. The two countries fought a war from 1980-1988 that killed about 1 million soldiers from both countries"

This is impossible.

Everyone knows that the U.S. Imperial Occupation has been far worse for Iraqis, and the death rate has been under 50,000 per year.

It is impossible for an 8 year war to account for over a million dead, since that would mean Saddam (who started the war) was responsbile for over 125,000 deaths per year, far worse than the deaths under the Imperialist Agressor Americans.

< / sarc>

15 posted on 04/14/2009 1:11:20 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (If Liberals' GOAL was the Destruction of Western Civilization, would their behavior differ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Israels attack on Iran later this year?” From your pen to Gods (and Bibis) ears, pal.


16 posted on 04/14/2009 1:15:19 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

17 posted on 04/14/2009 1:16:15 PM PDT by SJackson (Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Rep. Bobby Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: enraged

Let us hope Israel does it before BHO decides to take out Israel!!!!LOL After all, our friends are really not to be trusted and neither are right wing Americans according to him and DHS.


18 posted on 04/14/2009 1:28:47 PM PDT by phillyfanatic ( iT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: avacado

19 posted on 04/14/2009 1:37:24 PM PDT by doug from upland (10 million views of .HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You asked for comments. Well, the first paragraph, and I stopped dead in my tracks...


Gulf Cooperation Council members — Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Oman — are getting ready for what many now assume will be retaliation from Iran following Israeli bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities later this year.


It’s *really weird* to be reading about a future event — couched in “language” stating it as if it is a “fait accompli” — having *already* happened.

There is something “surreal” about an article that starts off this way... :-)


20 posted on 04/14/2009 1:37:51 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson