Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Legislature Approves Massive Traffic Camera Expansion
theNewspaper.com ^ | 04/09/2009 | n/a

Posted on 04/09/2009 11:23:46 AM PDT by Ken H

New York state legislature approves massive expansion in red light cameras.

As budget deficits continue to soar at all levels of New York government, the state legislature on Tuesday approved a package of bills to provide relief through the use of red light cameras. The package of six bills extends new authority to use red light cameras to Buffalo, Nassau County, Rochester, Suffolk County and Yonkers. The legislature also gave the nod to New York City's long-held desire to increase by half the number of automated ticketing machines already installed.

Each project is called a "demonstration program" that will produce detailed reports on an annual basis until the program expiration date of 2014. New York City began its demonstration project in 1994 and has never yet produced this report as required by law. Moreover, the city conceals the locations of cameras and allows no independent study of the effects on traffic safety.

The proposed expansions were approved in the state Assembly by a margin of around 100 to 35 and were adopted by the State Senate by a margin of about 54-8.

The bills' passage was made possible when state Assembly Transportation Committee Chairman David Gantt (D-Rochester) converted from camera opponent to promoter of red light cameras. This conversion happened last year after Sensys Traffic, a Swedish company interested in breaking into the US traffic camera market through the Albany firm CMA Consulting Services, paid $80,000 to Gantt's former legislative counsel, Robert Scott Gaddy.

The Buffalo News exposed the link after noticing that Gantt introduced legislation specifically designed to force local jurisdictions to use the technology offered by the client of his former employee.

Although Gantt's legislation is now technology-neutral, it opens the door for Sensys to bid for the lucrative red light camera contracts throughout the state. After procedural approval in the state Assembly, the bills will become law with the signature of Governor David Paterson (D), an enthusiastic supporter of photo ticketing.

Independent studies of the use of red light cameras show that the devices tend to create an increase in the total number of injuries and accidents (view studies). On the other hand, New York City has cleared more than $75 million in net profit on its program. The text of the New York City and Rochester bills is available in a 100k PDF file at the source link below.

Source: Red Light Camera Legislation (New York State Legislature, 4/7/2009)


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: redlightcamera; redlightcameras
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2009 11:23:46 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ken H

But I thought that these cameras were all about safety and not revenue generation...that’s what we were originally told when they started going up everywhere.


2 posted on 04/09/2009 11:25:03 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Automated revenue collections ...


3 posted on 04/09/2009 11:27:22 AM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, your surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

These camera’s are not going to be placed to enhance public safety. That may be a side benefit(but I doubt it) but these camera’s are being placed as a tax on speeders, a fund raiser. I suppose the speeders will not receive points on their license, but will pay the tax.

Maryland just passed a similar law to tax speeders. My guess is they will raise the tax like they raised the cigarette tax , until speeders dissappear. Or the camera’s do, the result of vandalism.


4 posted on 04/09/2009 11:28:11 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Wonderful, the onset of the total surveillance&kontrol society approaches us.

Drinkers, smokers, now drivers.

Enjoy, subjects.


5 posted on 04/09/2009 11:28:18 AM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

yeah.
cameras, that’s the ticket. it worked out real well for Nick Adenhart last night.


6 posted on 04/09/2009 11:29:31 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

I enjoyed living in New York, but wouldn’t do it again.


7 posted on 04/09/2009 11:29:38 AM PDT by razorback-bert (We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Why not just make it illegal to go outside?

That way you can give tickets to EVERYBODY!

8 posted on 04/09/2009 11:30:12 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Only after disaster can we be resurrected." -- Tyler Durden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
The government cancer has metastasized.

Host death is imminent.

9 posted on 04/09/2009 11:31:29 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Only after disaster can we be resurrected." -- Tyler Durden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Question: If I receive a ticket from a “red light camera” and I plead “not guilty,” how does the state or municipality prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I was driving the vehicle? Sure, the camera may prove that my truck went through a red light, but how does the camera prove that I was actually driving the truck at the time as opposed to a friend or relative?


10 posted on 04/09/2009 11:32:50 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

I hope they get them up in time to watch all the rich folks packing up and leaving town.


11 posted on 04/09/2009 11:33:10 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

If the government is going to try and pick my pocket can’t they at least try to be honest about it? I mean really at least the mob tells you how much you have to pay.


12 posted on 04/09/2009 11:35:02 AM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

The bloodsuckers are going to suck us dry by every means available to them.


13 posted on 04/09/2009 11:35:58 AM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

NYC should ticket the jay walkers. Ooops... better not give them any more ideas to tax. George Harrison was a prophet.... TAXMAN!


14 posted on 04/09/2009 11:37:02 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
How many “conservatives” voted for this?

People are waking up to this scam but as usual it is just crammed down our throats.

15 posted on 04/09/2009 11:38:27 AM PDT by Aglooka (Posting from New Hampshachusetts (Formerly New Hampshire))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Question: If I receive a ticket from a “red light camera” and I plead “not guilty,” how does the state or municipality prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I was driving the vehicle?

Reasonable doubt? Oh yes, the old justice system...

16 posted on 04/09/2009 11:39:02 AM PDT by Interesting Times (For the truth about "swift boating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
The government would probably just argue that you gave up your right to a fair trial in order to obtain the privilege of having a driver's license.
17 posted on 04/09/2009 11:40:30 AM PDT by Aglooka (Posting from New Hampshachusetts (Formerly New Hampshire))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
In some jurisdictions, a photo of the driver is taken too. I don't know what happens if you wear a hat, sunglasses, and a fake mustache though.
18 posted on 04/09/2009 11:41:41 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

“Or the camera’s do, the result of vandalism.”

http://www.speedcam.co.uk/gatso2.htm


19 posted on 04/09/2009 11:43:22 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Doesn’t matter, it’s like a parking ticket.

The car is registered to you, hence your responsibility.


20 posted on 04/09/2009 11:43:30 AM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson