Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
Posted on 04/03/2009 9:20:01 PM PDT by GoldStandard
For the financial crisis that has wiped out trillions in wealth, many have felt the lash of public outrage.
Fannie and Freddie. The idiot-bankers. The AIG bonus babies. The Bush Republicans and Barney Frank Democrats who bullied banks into making mortgages to minorities who could not afford the houses they were moving into.
But the Big Kahuna has escaped.
The Federal Reserve.
"(T)he very people who devised the policies that produced the mess are now posing as the wise public servants who will show us the way out," writes Thomas Woods in "Meltdown."
Already in its sixth week on the New York Times best-seller list, this eminently readable book traces the Fed's role in every financial crisis since this creature was spawned on Jekyl Island in 1913.
The "forgotten depression" of 1920-21 was caused by a huge increase in the money supply for President Wilson's war. When the Fed started to tighten at war's end, production fell 20 percent from mid-1920 to mid-1921, far more than today.
Why did we not read about that depression?
Because the much-maligned Warren Harding refused to intervene. He let businesses and banks fail and prices fall. Hence, the fever quickly broke, and we were off into "the Roaring Twenties."
But, the Fed reverted, expanding the money supply by 55 percent, an average of 7.3 percent a year, not through an expansion of the currency, but through loans to businesses.
Thus, when the Fed tightened in the overheated economy, the Crash came, as the stock market bubble the Fed had created burst.
Herbert Hoover, contrary to the myth that he was a small-government conservative, renounced laissez-faire, raised taxes, launched public works projects, extended emergency loans to failing businesses and lent money to the states for relief programs.
Hoover did what Obama is doing.
Indeed, in 1932, FDR lacerated Hoover for having presided over the "greatest spending administration in peacetime in all of history." His running mate, John Nance Garner, accused Hoover of "leading the country down the path to socialism." And "Cactus Jack" was right.
Terrified of the bogeyman that causes Ben Bernanke sleepless nights -- deflation, falling prices -- FDR ordered crops destroyed, pigs slaughtered, and business cartels to cut production and fix prices.
FDR mistook the consequences of the Depression -- falling prices -- for the cause of the depression. But prices were simply returning to where they belonged in a free market, the first step in any cure.
Obama is repeating the failed policies of Hoover and FDR, by refusing to let prices fall. Obama, with his intervention to prop up housing prices and Bernanke with his gushers of money to bail out bankrupt banks and businesses are creating a new bubble that will burst even more spectacularly.
The biggest myth, writes Woods, is that it was World War II that ended the Great Depression. He quotes Paul Krugman:
"What saved the economy and the New Deal was the enormous public works project known as World War II, which finally provided a fiscal stimulus adequate to the economy's needs."
This Nobel Prize winner's analysis, writes Woods, is a "stupefying and bizarre misunderstanding of what actually happened,"
Undoubtedly, with 29 percent of the labor force conscripted at one time or another into the armed forces, and their jobs taken by elderly men, women and teenagers with little work experience, unemployment will fall.
But how can an economy be truly growing 13 percent a year, as the economists claim, when there is rationing, shortages everywhere, declining product quality, an inability to buy homes and cars, and a longer work week? When the cream of the labor force is in boot camps or military bases, or storming beaches, sailing ships, flying planes and marching with rifles, how can your real economy be booming?
It was 1946, a year economists predicted would result in a postwar depression because government spending fell by two-thirds, that proved the biggest boom year in all of American history.
Why? Because the real economy was producing what people wanted: cars, TVs, homes. Businesses were responding to consumers, not the clamor of a government run by dollar-a-year men who wanted planes, tanks, guns and ships to blow things up.
"The Fed was the greatest single contributor to the crisis that unfolds before us," Woods writes of today, and "more dollars were created between 2000 and 2007 than in the rest of the republic's history."
After 9-11, the Fed kept interest rates low -- in one year as low as 1 percent. That money flooded into the housing and stock markets. And in 2008, as the Fed tightened, the bubble burst.
Now the money supply is again expanding, to rescue us from a crisis created by the previous expansion. Of Nicholas Biddle's Bank of the United States, the great Andrew Jackson was eloquent.
"It has tried to kill me," he said. "But I will kill it." And he did.
Should not this creature from Jekyl Island, for all its manifold crimes and sins against the republic, also be summarily put to death?
We should not kill the Fed before we vote BWWWAAAANNNNYYYY Frank and Chris “Waitress sandwich” Dodd OUT!
Don’t killem get a rope and string em up!!!!
Yes. The Fed is a disaster.
Bawney and “Wolfman” Chris Dodd love the chaos ... and the side payments from the banks.
I’m in favor of a few keel-haulings followed by a draw and quarter.
The old ‘money trust’ morphed itself into the Fed by creating so much dislike for the money trust that the country begged for a solution. The money trust offered up the Fed Reserve in disguise in 1913, and started over with the new entity.
Maybe now the Fed is deliberately angling to be ‘fired’ again. The ‘new’ solution this time may be the financial director of the NAUnion, adding Canada and Mexico to their control...after all, the NAU is on fast track again as reported by Lou Dobbs.
Wow, I just noticed something that I consider to be a positive sign: we’ve gone to a total of FIVE posts & there has yet to be one single “trash Pat” comment as of yet.
Uh-oh...here come the NeoCon Pat Trashers right now, I can hear them cursing in the distance.
What 'Bush Republicans' is Buchanan talking about here? Or is he just lying to push his own agenda?
I’m not sure what a “Pat Trasher” is, but I do know that you are a n00b without a reason to whine about a thread.
Welcome to FR!
Can you name me one or two of these ‘Bush Republicans’ Buchanan is trashing? Or are we supposed to have faith in Pat without knowledge?
It’s not a matter of faith, it’s a matter of understanding monetary history.
Trashing ‘Bush Republicans’ without specifics or names seriously weakens Buchanan’s arguments and damages his credibility. I’m calling BS on Buchanan’s fingerpointing here until I hear better than that.
Hmmm. It seems that Ron Paul isn’t so much of a crackpot after all.
WWII did not end the Depression. It happened DURING the Depression. As PJB accurately says, the Depression ended when the war ended.
Krugman’s idiocy is easily demonstrated: How can anyone but a lunatic say that there is “prosperity” when no one is building cars, radios, washing machines, houses, etc.?
I am baffled by this massive loss of wealth and the response of American citizens. My Brothers each lost half of their net worth in the past 18 months and they behave as if nothing has happened and there is zero outrage. They were stolen from by their own investment funds, banks and their government and they utter not a peep.
Strange times.
The Libertarian ping list will have plenty to contribute to this topic.
Since when has PJB become an advocate of free trade? His analysis is sound, though hardly original; many others have said and written the same thing for years.
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.