Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roll call vote breakdown: The 85 House Republicans who supported Rangel’s 90 percent bonus tax
Michelle Malkin ^ | 3/19/09 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 03/19/2009 9:16:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

You can find the full roll call vote on HR 1586, tax cheat Charlie Rangel’s ass-covering, after-the-fact AIG bonus tax here. I have broken out the 85 Republicans (led by GOP Minority Whip Eric Cantor) who voted with Rangel and the Democrat demagogues.

(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; aig; bonustax; breakdown; houserepublicans; markkirktruthfile; rangel; rmsp; rollcall; taxincrease; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2009 9:16:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Because you should know:

Aderholt
Alexander
Barton (TX)
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Blunt
Bono Mack
Boozman
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Cao
Capito
Cassidy
Castle
Crenshaw
Davis (KY)
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Duncan
Ehlers
Emerson
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Gerlach
Goodlatte
Guthrie
Heller
Herger
Hoekstra
Johnson (IL)
Jones
Kirk
Lance
Latham
Lee (NY)
Lewis (CA)
LoBiondo
Manzullo
McCaul
McClintock
McHugh
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Miller (MI)
Moran (KS)
Petri
Platts
Putnam
Rehberg
Reichert
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Schmidt
Schock
Shimkus
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Stearns
Tiberi
Turner
Upton
Walden
Wamp
Whitfield
Wittman
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

***

Way to go, confiscatory Republicans. Charlie Rangel, Chris Dodd, and Barney “Grabby Hands” Frank thank you!


2 posted on 03/19/2009 9:16:46 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

HR 1586 roll call vote
http://clerk.house.gov/cgi-bin/vote.asp?year=2009&rollnumber=143


3 posted on 03/19/2009 9:17:24 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

some surprises on the list..


4 posted on 03/19/2009 9:17:56 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

or maybe not.


5 posted on 03/19/2009 9:18:51 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It’s the precedent it sets that is so sickening.

Shame on every last one of them.


6 posted on 03/19/2009 9:19:01 PM PDT by beagleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Any earmarked goodies hidden within this vote?


7 posted on 03/19/2009 9:20:20 PM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Stearns is mine, he is usually way conservative.


8 posted on 03/19/2009 9:20:27 PM PDT by libbylu (Sarah - the light of the midnight sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Boy, you got that right! There are three there that I thought would never vote for this. I wonder what happened?
Three FAX’s off in the AM asking.


9 posted on 03/19/2009 9:21:54 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Holding face in my hands!


10 posted on 03/19/2009 9:23:54 PM PDT by diamond6 (Is SIDS preventable? www.Stopsidsnow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Malkin’s missing the point.


11 posted on 03/19/2009 9:24:02 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Too many Floridians on that list. Hey, RPoF ... whiskey tango foxtrot? Glad to see Bill Posey knows better and he’s a first-termer.


12 posted on 03/19/2009 9:24:06 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

None of my congresscreeps are on the Benedict Arnold wall of shame list.

It would sure be nice to see these guys tried for Treason but that is a pipe dream. Failing that, maybe someday when someone petitions the Supremes they will declare this POS legislation UN-Constitutional as it is.

That is if the petition gets by the law clerk and if the Supremes think it is worthy of consideration or they have not been bought off like the rest of Washington, whores that they are.


13 posted on 03/19/2009 9:24:09 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Get the bats and light the hay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

These people are insane.


14 posted on 03/19/2009 9:25:15 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Barack Obama: in your guts, you know he's nuts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Cantor’s the most disappointing for me.


15 posted on 03/19/2009 9:25:20 PM PDT by Chairman of the Bard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Rush played the reasoning why some of the Republicans voted for the bill this morning. It was a speech made by Ed Royce. I believe Dana Rohrabacher probably felt the same way. These guys are staunchly conservative

Basically it was to teach the private companies a lesson about coming to the federal government looking for a handout. In other words if they get their hand slapped they may not come back while hopefully others will stay away.

You may or may not agree but that is the reasoning. It was not a sellout as some on this board are thinking.


16 posted on 03/19/2009 9:25:49 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Cantor may have a Parliamentary excuse but the others? bah!


17 posted on 03/19/2009 9:27:38 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Cantor’s POTUS prospects are toast. McClintock is a surprise. At least Duncan Hunter Jr. & Issa aren’t on this list with the rest of the CA GOP / RINO delegation.


18 posted on 03/19/2009 9:27:52 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beagleone
It’s the precedent it sets that is so sickening.

They're just not smart enough to think about precedent.

For the most part, we are being led by people who keep their hair neat and don't make any major gaffes in their campaigns.

19 posted on 03/19/2009 9:28:32 PM PDT by JennysCool (Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action - Ian Fleming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
BAH!!!!! This whole gaddamn travesty has been turned into a political jab-and-feint by The Sedition. Vote for it, then you're a complicit tax-jacker. Vote against it, you're still you're still a highway robber. These Barney Fifes we've put in office don't have the cojones or the intellect to stand up for what's right. The Occupation has played all of them like a Stradivarius violin.


20 posted on 03/19/2009 9:28:37 PM PDT by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hmm...?
John Culberson (TX) was "NV" on this one.
Anyone know why?
21 posted on 03/19/2009 9:28:55 PM PDT by Birdlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

in other words - it is a punishment for their earlier misdeed.

very dissapointing nonetheless


22 posted on 03/19/2009 9:29:08 PM PDT by zwerni (this isn't gonna be good for business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

I appreciate the input.

In the end, the courts may trash it anyway... but.. if a lesson is learned.. good.


23 posted on 03/19/2009 9:29:18 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

My Congressman voted against it.
2 wrongs do not make a right.


24 posted on 03/19/2009 9:31:19 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chairman of the Bard
cantor is a Rush attacking liberal rino... hate to say it... but it is true.

LLS

25 posted on 03/19/2009 9:32:30 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

There’s a good list to start with on who needs to be voted out of office. If they want to toss out the constitution they need to be tossed out themselves.


26 posted on 03/19/2009 9:34:06 PM PDT by highlander_UW (The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

I agree.

LLS


27 posted on 03/19/2009 9:34:23 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I thought this kind of bill was unconstitutional.


28 posted on 03/19/2009 9:39:09 PM PDT by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Sent this letter to my idiot. Thats 2 in 2 days. Its on. I gave him the benefit of the doubt as a newbie on the GIVE act. He is toast.

Congressman Rooney,

I can honestly say I had hoped that you were not going to be another RINO. I now know that I wasted another vote. In the last 2 days, you have voted to enforce mandatory volunteerism, an oxymoron especially to a conservative like myself. I have brought my children up to give back to their communities. Now government is going to do that for me? Mandatory Volunteering is servitude, conscription, serfdom, and it is a socialist tenet. If it were attached to those who only take, like welfare receipents for life, or section 8 receipients as a way to give back some of what they take, so be it.

The scarier issue for me here is you vote to raise taxes on big bonus earners. You have attached your name to a bill that will be found unconstitutional. Maybe you should try reading the constitution, the bill of rights, the declaration of independence. When in the course of human events it becomes necessary.....It is becoming necessary. I had hoped you were going to prove to be a champion of America. It seems as though in your short time in office, you are helping to tear down a country that you claim to love.

I had hoped we would have an ally in the congress. A voice. It is apparent that our representation in Florida is non existent, and we are assisting the current congress and administration on their extremely rapid march toward socialism.

May your children forgive you, I know I will not.


29 posted on 03/19/2009 9:39:59 PM PDT by wombtotomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

..................stop allowing them to take your money.............


30 posted on 03/19/2009 9:40:38 PM PDT by jadedeagle (From the desk of the Jaded Eagle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I think many of them voted that way to show they are in agreement with teaching these weasels a lesson. This is government-taxpayer (our) money they are squandering on failure.

This will likely amount to little more than symbolism anyway. I think the courts will overturn it because it singles out one specific group to be punished via taxation. I do not think that will hold in the courts.


31 posted on 03/19/2009 9:41:07 PM PDT by WildcatClan (Iam fimus mos ledo ventus apparatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

I’d prefer to see all the members of the RMSP taken out first, that would cull quite a few moderates.

I understand a lot of folks are beyond upset and disappointed with the list here but unless you’re an AIG bonus recipient or with any other entity that receives bonuses from bail-out money, I wouldn’t go whole hog to dump all of them.

jmo


32 posted on 03/19/2009 9:41:10 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I just sent this letter to my congressman Republican Dave Reichert, 8th district, Washington.

How disappointed I am to find out that you Congressman Reichert has voted along with most Democrats and 85 House Republicans supporting Rangels 90 percent bonus tax. . As much as we all hate to see bailed out company executives get bonus checks paid for by tax payers dollars, this punitive 90% tax is unconstitutional. But why should I expect these same Congressmen to have ever read the Constitution when they don’t even read bills they vote on. You a man with a law background should out of all of them know better. The rule of law must stand above this, ‘if it makes you feel good do it’, vote today in congress. You have lost my support and vote forever because of this knee-jerk reaction and illegal vote. I will be supporting someone else to represent me next election.


33 posted on 03/19/2009 9:41:41 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Basically it was to teach the private companies a lesson about coming to the federal government looking for a handout. In other words if they get their hand slapped they may not come back while hopefully others will stay away.

Admitting that they are punishing these guys by confiscatory taxes? Oh to be one of the AIG employee lawyers. Such a slam dunk case because congressmen take such glee in admitting that this was a bill punishing individuals without due process.

34 posted on 03/19/2009 9:41:51 PM PDT by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Any Republican that would approve a 90 percent tax on anything, and I mean anything - I do not care what the reason is - should get the boot from the party.


35 posted on 03/19/2009 9:42:49 PM PDT by beagleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

You know who always seems to vote the right (literally and figuratively) way? Jeb Hensarling.


36 posted on 03/19/2009 9:43:32 PM PDT by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It’s okay with me they got Fannie and Freddie too.


37 posted on 03/19/2009 9:43:51 PM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libbylu
Stearns is mine, he is usually way conservative.

Rehberg is mine, and he's oftentimes very conservative in his voting pattern.

38 posted on 03/19/2009 9:46:13 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I understand a lot of folks are beyond upset and disappointed with the list here but unless you’re an AIG bonus recipient or with any other entity that receives bonuses from bail-out money, I wouldn’t go whole hog to dump all of them.

In my view, the country is pretty much a lost cause at this point. Too many of our leaders are willing to discard the foundation of the nation either intentionally or through ignorance. And far too many of the electorate are idiots and/or willfully and negligently ignorant. I can agree that there are some that are even more deserving to lose their jobs than this list, but as I see it, this group has violated the Constitution and in doing so violated their oaths of office and really need to resign or be thrown out. My concern is the discarding of the Constitution, not particularly the bonus money.

39 posted on 03/19/2009 9:48:49 PM PDT by highlander_UW (The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: beagleone

Agreed. Completely.

This will eventually make it to the Supremes. They’ll just laugh as they rule against it. It’s a no-brainer even for the Libs on the Court.

Just a populist tantrum.


40 posted on 03/19/2009 9:49:14 PM PDT by JennysCool (Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action - Ian Fleming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well case closed. Prepare to abandon ship. Every man for himself.


41 posted on 03/19/2009 9:49:21 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Look. Give it up on Repubs. They are selling us down the river.


42 posted on 03/19/2009 9:51:19 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

Have you figgerd out yet that Ron Paul is not a kook and these Psuedo Republican worthless idiots are selling us out yet. They will turn on us!!


43 posted on 03/19/2009 9:54:14 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Thankfully, Simpson (R-ID) is not among them.
44 posted on 03/19/2009 9:58:31 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The Senate will not even look at it this month and their bill wants 70%. It ain’t going to happen.


45 posted on 03/19/2009 9:58:41 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (We have nothing to fear but Obama himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

bookmark


46 posted on 03/19/2009 10:01:07 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

I can’t argue with the continuing assault on the Constitution, whether intentional or otherwise, as we are witnessing here.

I agree, the amount of money involved is miniscule in the potential harm to the nation as a whole.


47 posted on 03/19/2009 10:03:09 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

in comparison to the potential harm


48 posted on 03/19/2009 10:04:50 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
“It was not a sellout as some on this board are thinking.”

I don't care what Rush may have said. The constitution is nothing to be played with. These elected representatives are sworn in with the oath to “uphold the constitution”, not vote against it to make a political point. What next Freedom of speech, or the 2nd amendment?

49 posted on 03/19/2009 10:05:25 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: beagleone

It’s the precedent it sets that is so sickening.

Shame on every last one of them.


Who’d a thunk Republicans would have ever voted for a 90% tax under any circumstances—especially after the fact?! What’s next, retroactive capital gains increases from the good old days when there actually were gains?!

WELL maybe I should have said “conservatives” instead of Republicans, but then many Republicans aren’t conservative :(

Reagan is rolling in his grave :(


50 posted on 03/19/2009 10:06:25 PM PDT by bushwon (Wonder if our founding fathers would even recognize the USA?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson