Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Vatican Official Slams Choice of Kathleen Sebelius for Secretary of Health and Human Services
LifeSiteNews ^ | 3/13/09 | LifeSiteNews

Posted on 03/13/2009 9:43:20 AM PDT by wagglebee

SAN DIEGO, CA, March 13, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The head of the Roman Catholic Church's highest office overseeing Church law has slammed the nomination of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), calling the nomination "the source of greatest embarrassment" to the Catholic Church.
 
In an interview with Thomas J. McKenna, president of Catholic Action for Faith and Family, Archbishop Raymond L. Burke, Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, strongly supported the means by which the Governor has been disciplined by her bishop because of her public support for abortion. Kansas Archbishop Joseph Naumann has been strongly critical of Sebelius in the past, publicly admonishing her not to receive Communion, and has called Obama's nomination of the governor "offensive." 

"Archbishop Naumann acted with exemplary pastoral charity in the matter, protecting the Body and Blood of Christ from unworthy reception, preventing the Governor from the commission of the most serious sin of sacrilege, and ending the great scandal caused by the Governor's unworthy reception of the Body and Blood of Christ" said Archbishop Burke in the interview.
 
When asked for his opinion on the nomination of Governor Sebelius as Secretary of Health and Human Services he said, "As a Roman Catholic, her appointment is the source of the greatest embarrassment because she has publicly and repeatedly betrayed her Catholic faith."

"What is more, she has obstinately remained in her moral error after being admonished by, at least, three of her Bishops … Her position on the question of procured abortion is the source of the greatest scandal to Catholics and to all who uphold the natural moral law."

"No matter how good Governor Sebelius' record regarding other human life concerns may be, if she is not committed to the safeguarding of human life from its very inception, she should not be entrusted with the questions of health and human services for our nation" he continued.

The Archbishop concluded his remarks by saying that "every bishop" is held to the "universal Church discipline" found in Canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law, which state that, "Those [...] who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion."

"Whether Governor Sebelius is in the Archdiocese of Kansas City in Kansas, or in any other diocese, she should not present herself for Holy Communion because, after pastoral admonition, she obstinately persists in serious sin."
 
In a separate interview with Archbishop Naumann, McKenna asked why the bishop publicly asked Governor Sebelius not to present herself for Holy Communion. "My motivation was primarily to protect the Church and her teaching, as well as to protect our people from being misled" he explained.
 
When asked about the sin of scandal he explained, "I am very concerned about the governor and others like her leading individuals to think that it is not really so bad if you support abortion. What I think is even more deadly, especially for our young people, is for them to think that if the law permits abortion it must not be all that bad for me to procure an abortion either."
 
Both interviews can be read in their entirety on Catholic Action for Faith and Family's web site, http://www.CatholicAction.org



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: abortion; bho44; bhohhs; catholic; moralabsolutes; prolife; sebelius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
"No matter how good Governor Sebelius' record regarding other human life concerns may be, if she is not committed to the safeguarding of human life from its very inception, she should not be entrusted with the questions of health and human services for our nation" he continued.

I wonder if Sam Brownback has read this.

1 posted on 03/13/2009 9:43:21 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser; NYer; Pyro7480

Pro-Life/Catholic Ping


2 posted on 03/13/2009 9:44:06 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 03/13/2009 9:44:27 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Great embarrassment that this country elected a marxist as well for potus


4 posted on 03/13/2009 9:52:19 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Do you suppose that when she was a little girl sittin in Mass she ever thought that she would receive the attention of the Pontif? She must feel so proud.


5 posted on 03/13/2009 9:55:31 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
Do you suppose that when she was a little girl sittin in Mass she ever thought that she would receive the attention of the Pontif? She must feel so proud.

I doubt that, as young children, Hitler and Stalin ever thought they they would grow up to be the face of evil either.

6 posted on 03/13/2009 10:07:01 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

BLAH BLAH BLAH.....More cheap talk!

Start excommunicating! No one, including this Catholic, will take any of this seriously until such actions begin to occur.

Militant


7 posted on 03/13/2009 10:08:14 AM PDT by militant2 (President George W. Bush: "No child left behind"; obama: "No child left alive!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

She is a Apostle of Abortionism!


8 posted on 03/13/2009 10:46:06 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: militant2; wagglebee
Well, her Abp has admonished her not to receive Communion so she won't be receiving in his diocese. Apparently he doesn't know where her present domicile is (DC. but that could be suburban Maryland or Virginia) and those bishops have to tell her the same.

You might want to help a bit by petitioning the bishops of Arlington and DC that she be barred from Communion there, too:

Bishop Paul Loverde
The Catholic Diocese of Arlington
200 North Glebe Road
Arlington, VA 22203
Tel: 703-841-2500
Toll Free: 1-800-963-2505

communications@arlingtondiocese.org

----and---

Archbishop of Washington:
Most Reverend Donald W. Wuerl
P.O. Box 29260
Washington, DC 20017-0260
301-853-4500


Have at it, with gusto.

9 posted on 03/13/2009 12:57:33 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice. " GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: militant2

oh, don’t you know?

They’ve “excommunicated themselves” or some such BS that has no affect, in this world, and serves as NO consequence to which someone else can look and change their ways.


10 posted on 03/13/2009 12:59:32 PM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Haven’t you heard?

She’s “pro-life”! She wants to reduce the number of abortions! Just like 0bama.

People actually say these things...


11 posted on 03/13/2009 1:00:16 PM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...

Since Kathleen Sebelius will probably be living in DC, Archbishop Naumann has contacted Archbishop Wuerl to seek his cooperation in this matter as well.

Catholic Ping List
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


12 posted on 03/13/2009 3:29:27 PM PDT by NYer ("Run from places of sin as from a plague." - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I believe this appointment is directly related to the strategy of zero and the communists to undermine the faith, and in particular, the Catholic Church. The administration wants to sow seeds of doubt and dissent.


13 posted on 03/13/2009 3:40:58 PM PDT by ducdriver (judica me, Deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta. (Ps. 42))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Pinged from Terri Dailies


14 posted on 03/13/2009 6:14:26 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
They’ve “excommunicated themselves” or some such BS that has no affect, in this world,...

What what about the next world? That is much more important.

15 posted on 03/13/2009 7:27:37 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Brownback wants to be governor. So he lets this woman have a position where she will help make health care for all the nation’s hospitals?


16 posted on 03/13/2009 8:13:17 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Next day BUMP!


17 posted on 03/14/2009 4:20:12 AM PDT by ConservativeStLouisGuy (11th FReeper Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Unnecessarily Excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
Here is the interview...:

Archbishop Joseph Naumann Discusses the Pastoral Aspects of Disciplining the Governor of Kansas, Kathleen Sebelius, because of Her Insistent Pro-Abortion Stance
 
   
Thursday, 12 March 2009

 

In the interview he explains why he is disappointed she was nominated to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services

Catholic Action for Faith and Family

Interviewed by Thomas J. McKenna

Your Excellency: As you know the Governor of Kansas, Kathleen Sebelius, is a Catholic with a long record of supporting abortion and has been nominated by President Obama to be the director of Health and Human Services.

Last year you wrote the governor a letter asking that she refrain from presenting herself to receive Holy Communion because she was not in communion with the Catholic Church and its teachings. Can you explain what prompted you to do this?

Archbishop Naumann:

I had entered into a rather long dialogue with the governor over many months, trying as best as I could, to make her aware of the seriousness of her past actions as well as her present positions. Following our long conversations and additional actions on her part, such as vetoing a bill that was aimed at trying to regulate abortion clinics, I first asked her, privately in a letter, not to present herself for Communion for her own integrity and for her own spiritual welfare. My intention was not to make that public. It was only subsequent to that when in March of the following year she presented herself for communion at one of our parishes and the pastor informed me that I wrote her again renewing my request. I informed her that I would make the request public because, in addition to my concern for her spiritual wellbeing, I was also very concerned about others being misled by her presenting herself as a faithful Catholic while holding positions that were completely contrary to our teaching on the sanctity of human life.

In many circumstances the media has tried to politicize the issue saying that you are abusing your pastoral authority to influence politics. How would you respond to that?

My intention and my aim have not been to influence politics at all. In fact the timing on all of this was really dictated by the governor’s own actions. It was not, for example, juxtaposed to an election. My concern was, first of all, for her spiritual welfare and then secondly, and equally important, to protect the rest of my flock from being misled by her actions.

Frequently I received letters from people who were outraged at how the governor continued to go to Communion and yet consistently over the years aggressively supported legalized abortion. I was not principally concerned with the people who were writing me letters because they understood the contradiction. My greater concern was the larger number of faithful who were not writing letters and who were subject to being confused and might be thinking that perhaps the Church did not really see this as all that serious of an issue. My motivation was primarily to protect the Church and her teaching, as well as to protect our people from being misled.

Some Catholics are saying that the faithful should be proud that the President has nominated a Catholic to such a high cabinet post and the faithful should focus on the positive things that the governor has achieved throughout her public life. What would you say to them?

I have said on many occasions that the governor does possess many gifts and talents of leadership, and that there are aspects of Catholic social teachings that she has embraced and actually represents well in her public life. However, on the fundamental moral issue of the sanctity of human life she has been consistently, throughout her political career, an opponent of what the Church teaches. Under normal circumstances I, as the metropolitan Archbishop of Kansas, would be rejoicing that a Catholic from Kansas had been chosen for a cabinet position. However, in actuality, this just elevates to the national level another Catholic who is inconsistent in the practice of her faith. Now she is joining Vice President Biden, Speaker Pelosi and a whole raft of others in the senate and congress which I think are sending very confusing messages. It certainly is not a reason to rejoice to have yet another Catholic, in a prominent national position, sending a very confusing message to her fellow Catholics by her position on abortion.

What is also of great concern is that this is a very important position. Governor Sibelius will have influence in helping to shape policies regarding health care in the country particularly as they impact the life issues. Unfortunately, I think that anyone this president appoints is not going to be someone who is sensitive to the sanctity of human life. That is an unfortunate consequence of the choice of the American people in the last election.

Today many people do not seem to realize the seriousness of giving scandal.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states “Scandal is an attitude or behavior which leads another to do evil. The person who gives scandal becomes his neighbor's tempter. He damages virtue and integrity; he may even draw his brother into spiritual death. Scandal is a grave offense if by deed or omission another is deliberately led into a grave offense.” [C.C.C. 2284]

Given the seriousness of scandal is this not the reason you felt obligated to denounce Governor Sebelius’ long time public stance of supporting abortion and yet presenting herself as a practicing Catholic?

It absolutely is and it is absolutely the main reason I feel it is important for me to speak at this time as she is put on this national platform. I think this allows the scandal to spread even farther than the borders of Kansas. It is a very deadly message that she and others are communicating by this active support for legalized abortion.

As the pastor of a diocese entrusted with the responsibility of looking after the well-being of souls, how did you feel when you were put in the position of having to publicly reprimanding one entrusted to your care.

It is not a pleasant task. But it is part of my responsibility. As a priest and as a bishop we spend our lives trying to draw people to the Lord in the Eucharist. So to ask someone to refrain from receiving the Eucharist is a most serious matter and it is not something that I or any bishop would do lightly. However, on the other hand, part of our responsibility is to protect the integrity of the Eucharist, as well as to protect the integrity of our Faith and  by preventing innocent people from being misled. While it was not a pleasant thing to do, and it certainly takes one’s time and attention away from other pastoral needs, I felt it was a very important matter and an obligation on my part. Though I would rather be doing other things than trying to clarify these issues for people, it is an essential part of my ministry as a teacher of the Faith.

What counsel would you offer to a Catholic who feels inspired to follow a career in public life today but above all wants to remain faithful to their Catholic Faith?

I would say that you have to be faithful to your Catholic principles.  If to be faithful means you cannot advance, then so be it. We really need principled people in both parties that are trying to move their parties to embrace a position that respects the sanctity of all human life. We need people in the Democratic Party at the grass roots level who begin to change the party’s position on this fundamental human rights issue. We need people within the Republican Party who are dedicated to preserving the party’s pro-life plank in the platform.

We need good people to go into public life. This requires great sacrifices on their part. Their ambition must not be just to get elected. The most important thing for a Catholic politician is to be able to know in their own conscience that they have maintained their integrity. There are many issues in public life, where Catholics and other people of good will may disagree but when it comes to the fundamental issues of the sanctity of human life or the dignity of the human person, there can be no compromise.

For example, just as a Catholic could not support a racist position to get elected if that was a popular position, so they cannot compromise their integrity on the sanctity of the un-born child in order to get elected.


18 posted on 03/14/2009 4:21:56 AM PDT by ConservativeStLouisGuy (11th FReeper Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Unnecessarily Excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Done. Thanks for the contacts!

Militant


19 posted on 03/14/2009 8:07:38 AM PDT by militant2 (President George W. Bush: "No child left behind"; obama: "No child left alive!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrB
This empty rhetoric by the so-called “leaders” of the Church would be funny if it weren't so tragic.

Reminds me of an old Monty Python movie scene where the French soldier atop a castle threatens a force of English horsemen with “farting in their general direction”.

This has a similar smell........

Militant

20 posted on 03/14/2009 8:13:40 AM PDT by militant2 (President George W. Bush: "No child left behind"; obama: "No child left alive!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson