To: Zakeet
A debate between two unfunny anti-intellectual demogogues who cater to the worst elements of their respective ideological camps. What could be more entertaining?
To: curiosity
“A debate between two unfunny anti-intellectual demogogues who cater to the worst elements of their respective ideological camps”
Ann is very witty and intellectual.
I don’t know which two you are referring to.
17 posted on
03/10/2009 11:38:04 AM PDT by
y6162
To: curiosity
A debate between two unfunny anti-intellectual demogogues who cater to the worst elements of their respective ideological camps. What could be more entertaining?
And you are either ignorant of who Ann really is, or not a conservative.
28 posted on
03/10/2009 11:45:45 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
To: curiosity
She may be a demogogue but Ann is far from an anti-intellectual. She has the stats and facts to back up her assertions but enjoys tweaking the libs.
30 posted on
03/10/2009 11:47:38 AM PDT by
danmyte
(dana)
To: curiosity
I agree that Ann is “anti-intellectual”. It appears that you are the “intellectual”. Ann is intelligent. I’m not sure about you.
To: curiosity
A debate between two unfunny anti-intellectual demogogues who cater to the worst elements of their respective ideological camps. You liberals always put being "intellectual" at the top of your list of virtues, so I'm assuming you think you are one, correct? Myself, I happen to think intellectuals are informed narcissists, especially those who think and say they are intellectual, like you.
50 posted on
03/10/2009 1:01:19 PM PDT by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: curiosity
Ann’s pretty darned funny.
54 posted on
03/10/2009 1:06:04 PM PDT by
brytlea
(Proud descendent of Andrew Kent, Alamo Defender)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson