Posted on 03/10/2009 4:40:45 AM PDT by marktwain
BELLEVUE, Wash., March 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Second Amendment Foundation and three Washington, D.C. residents today filed a lawsuit challenging a regulation by District of Columbia city government that arbitrarily bans handguns based on a roster of "acceptable" handguns approved by the State of California.
The District is using this list despite a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court last summer that protects handguns that ordinary people traditionally use for self-defense. This scheme could eventually bar the ownership of any new handguns.
Attorney Alan Gura, representing the plaintiffs in this case, noted that District bureaucrats "told Tracy Ambeau Hanson her gun was the wrong color." Americans are not limited to a government list of approved books, or approved religions, he said. A handgun protected by the Second Amendment doesn't need to appear on any government-approved list either.
"The Springfield XD-45 is approved for sale in Washington," Gura noted, "so long as it is black, green, or brown, but her bi-tone version is supposedly 'unsafe.'"
Added SAF founder Alan Gottlieb, "The Supreme Court's decision is crystal clear: Handguns that are used by people for self-defense and other lawful purposes cannot be banned, whether the city likes it or not. The city needs to accept the Second Amendment reality and stop this nonsense."
Hanson, one of the individual plaintiffs in the case, wondered, "Do we really need a gun-fashion police? I just want to be able to exercise my Second Amendment rights without interference from the District government."
Joining Hanson are Gillian and Paul St. Lawrence. Gillian St. Lawrence's handgun would once have been allowed, until its listing expired, leaving her to observe, "I didn't realize that my constitutional rights had an expiration date."
Her husband sought to own the same type of handgun that the Supreme Court had ordered District officials to allow Dick Heller to possess. However, that particular model is no longer manufactured, and its maker is no longer available to process the handgun's certification through the bureaucracy.
"The Supreme Court's decision should really be the last word on whether I can own this model handgun," said Mr. St. Lawrence.
"The so-called 'safe' gun list is just another gun-grabbing gimmick," said Gura. "This is the same old, tried and failed D.C. handgun ban by another name. The city can't get around the Second Amendment by declaring most normal guns 'unsafe,' and gradually shrinking the number of so-called 'safe' guns to zero."
Valuable assistance is being provided by the CalGuns Foundation.
"CalGuns Foundation was saddened to see the California Handgun Roster adopted in D.C.," CalGuns Chairman Gene Hoffman added. "Our state has a reputation as being a leader on many fronts. Unfortunately, this has included violating the rights of law abiding gun owners. After nearly a decade of experience with the California Handgun Roster, the CalGuns Foundation is uniquely able to assist in this case."
The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
Nice choice of gun, too. I love my XD45.
Here’s the best part - in order to comply with proposed California regs and certain department requests, the XD45 is now available with a thumb safety (as with certain Glock models). The ironic thing is that the “less safe” one without the thumb safety is legal in CA, but the thumb safety model is *not* because the Attorney General hasn’t “tested” it yet. And it seems that their testing regime has fallen victim to “budget cuts”. Imagine that.
Let’s regulate what types of pens are sold. After all, words which are properly strung together can cause riots.
Added SAF founder Alan Gottlieb, “The Supreme Court’s decision is crystal clear: Handguns that are used by people for self-defense and other lawful purposes cannot be banned, whether the city likes it or not. The city needs to accept the Second Amendment reality and stop this nonsense.”
This should be the begiing and the end of the argument.
Nothing more needs to be said.
Thank you, Second Amendment Foundation.
The SAF is by far the second most effective gun group we have trailing behind the NRA. Morton Grove, the city that started all the gun bans no longer has a ban thanks to the NRA and the SAF.
Me, too! It is my concealed carry weapon of choice. It goes where I go!
Reminds me of a GREAT joke I once heard, a practical joke that you can play on any gun-hating liberal.
Start a private conversation about "assault weapons", at a party or gathering with a liberal that you know hates guns. Play along with them for a while, giving them your best, most unemotional arguments. Finally, when the time is right (you've had enough of trying to convince the unconvinceable), say loudly, in an outraged voice, "You just hate them because they're BLACK!" and stomp off in a faux rage.
Let them try to explain THAT one.
I dream of a day where a gun will not be judged by the color of it’s slide and frame, but by the content of it’s caliber...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.