Posted on 03/08/2009 10:43:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
My bunny-hugging antagonist’s embarrassed silence on the BBC radio phone-in told me all I needed to know.
Yes, it really is now a criminal offense in Britain to abuse an ant, a worm, a slug, cockroach, a scorpion, a stick insect or whatever creature you care to name. The moment you decide to keep it as a pet you are obliged by our Animal Welfare Act to take full account of its welfare needs -- or face a $30,000 fine or a twelve-month prison sentence.
And if you think cockroach rights sound crazy, wait till you hear how the law applies to the way you keep your dog or your cat. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) -- one of the numerous, busybody branches of our socialist New Labour administration -- recently issued guidelines to pet owners clarifying the law.
You risk prosecution if:
-- You fail to groom your long-haired dog or cat once a day.
-- You feed your dog from the table.
-- You use your hands or feet when playing with your cat (as this may encourage aggressive behavior).
-- You fail to provide every cat in your household with its own litter tray (even if the cat has access to a garden).
-- You try to make your cat vegetarian by denying it meat.
None of these provisions is in itself a criminal offense, a DEFRA spokesman has explained helpfully. But failure to comply with several of them “may be used in evidence to support a prosecution for animal cruelty.”
Well, that’s me done for then. In the last few years, I have contravened every one of these pet care laws (apart from the last one: encouraging feline vegetarianism -- indeed, encouraging any form of vegetarianism -- really should, I believe, be punishable by imprisonment and torture at the very least), especially the one regarding cat litter trays.
Our ageing cat, Beetle, doesn’t have a litter tray at all. Why? Well, for one, thing he’s a cat, and, from what I’ve observed of the feline species, they’re quite intelligent enough to do their business outside and don't need the option of indoor facilities. And, for another, I’m the human. I pay the mortgage. I buy the cat food. We’re the master species (or at least we used to be). So it seems to me only fair that I should be the one who gets to decide whether or not to keep a tray of gravel in my kitchen smelling faintly of cat poop.
But the bunny-huggers disagree. Not only do they disagree, but they now have the full force of the UK law behind them. And -- in the form of our chief animal welfare charity the Royal Society For The Prevention of Cruelty To Animals (RSPCA) -- they even have an army of uniformed enforcers ready to knock on your door at the merest whiff of an infringement.
It was a run-in with the RSPCA which got me into that BBC radio phone-in in the first place. I’d written a magazine article about an unfortunate incident involving two hamsters we’d bought from the pet shop, one to keep for our family, one as a replacement for the school hamster which had accidentally been killed while we were looking after it.
Unfortunately, while one of the two hamsters was docile and friendly, the other one was an evil biter which kept drawing blood. First we tried asking the pet store to take it back, but they wouldn’t. Then we tried palming Devil Hamster off on the school, but they said: “We can’t have this one! He keeps biting our children.” So finally, as the man of the household (and thus the chief vermin exterminator), I was given the job of getting rid of it. Which I did, in a typically cowardly way, by releasing it into our local park.
A few days later, I received a letter from the RSPCA informing me that there had been a complaint and that I had been guilty of a criminal act which rendered me liable for a fine or imprisonment. On this occasion they were minded not to prosecute. But next time…
I was surprised and not a little disturbed. Since when did the sort of animal welfare charities one used to associate with cute little kittens with bandaged paws suddenly have the right to go round threatening free citizens? Since the 2006 Animal Welfare Act, I learned. This came into force in 2007 but -- as with so many of the laws New Labour has introduced, at the rate of one imprisonable offense every FOUR days during its twelve years in power -- it has sat on the statute books almost unnoticed.
Only in the last month, with DEFRA’s new guidelines (and the publicity given to my “I am a hamster murderer” story) has the British public become fully aware of its manifest absurdities.
Why, for example, is it still perfectly legal for me to poison the colony of mice in my skirting boards, but an imprisonable offence to cause them any harm the moment I capture them and make them my pets?
How low in the biological chain do you have to go before an animal becomes ineligible for protection? Suppose I kept a pet amoeba: could I be imprisoned for being cruel to one of those? Sadly, the law does not specify.
Meanwhile, it -- currently at least -- remains perfectly legal in Britain for sportsmen to shoot game birds like pheasants and grouse; to stalk stag; and even to hunt foxes on horseback (provided someone is holding a falcon or other bird of prey and the fox is not killed by the hounds but driven towards a gun).
Such are the messy compromises and idiocies which result when a government gets into bed with the lunatics of the animal rights lobby. Such are the pleasures, I fear, that await you in the U.S. when your new president and his rag-bag of socialist hangers-on and politically correct bleeding hearts start getting properly into their stride.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
James Delingpole is an English journalist, writer and broadcaster. His books include "Welcome To Obamaland" (Regnery) and "Coward on the Beach" (Bloomsbury) the first in a series of adventure novels set in World War II.
I agree.
And once a roach crosses my threshold, he has the responsibility to pay rent or ....
Same with spiders.
And crickets.
And mice.
And any other critters who show up.
The Brits have gone fully ‘round the bend, I fear.
Why doesn’t Salmonella enteritidis have rights? What about necrotizing fasciitis? We need to outlaw hand soap and spread as much contagion as possible! Bacteria are starving!
/end sarc
We're on the same road, just a few miles behind the UK.
You risk prosecution if:
— You try to make your cat vegetarian by denying it meat.
well at least that makes sense
Well, I have to agree with that one. :-)
My cats share a food dish, a litter box and sometimes animosity. In fact they also share a water bowl with a dog. Horrors!
One good thing about a depression, should it arrive, is that nonsense laws like those described in this article will be quickly left in the dust as priorities realign due to pesky details like survival.
Special rights for cockroaches and rodents? Please. Congress is arrogant enough as it is!
The spiders.
They leave me alone i leave them alone.
Except maybe for the big hairy ones.
How about when the dog attacks my feet, like mine does.(playfully)
Send him to doggie prison?
Endangered or threatened? Feds review pocket gopher protection request
Also, they are trying to split 'blacktailed prairie dogs' into separate 'populations', then impose restrictions on each 'population', just like they did salmon: treat each 'population' as if it were a separate species.
Some years ago, Washington state passed an initiative bill outlawing trapping written by the Greenies, with full assurance that they could be believed that it wouldn't apply to rats, mice, gophers, and other vermin pests. Guess what! The Greenies lied, and I've read articles of prosecutions for trapping vermin with 'cruel, lethal traps', instead of live traps for 'release to the wild'. Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:06 AM MST
GREEN RIVER — The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has decided to conduct a year-long status review of the Wyoming pocket gopher to see if the animal requires federal endangered species protections.
[snip]
What about the animal who's rights are abrogated by forcing it to be eaten?
Hedgehogs are some seriously cute little guys.
Excellent points.
After all rights come with responsibilities - although that usually is conveniently forgotten.
Really, what is animal rights?
It’s the right of some humans to not have their sensibilities hurt by the way you treat your animals.
Just imagine where this will lead if everyone’s sensibilities is to be protected by the force of the state!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.