Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Detroit As the Prodigal Son
TownHall ^ | February 22, 2009 | Steve Chapman

Posted on 02/22/2009 10:22:51 AM PST by dbz77

In the New Testament story, a man has two sons. One of them demands his inheritance, runs off and squanders it all having a wild time, and ends up penniless.

At that point, he slinks home in disgrace, assuming he will have to beg forgiveness. But his father is so thrilled to have him back that he kills a fatted calf and throws a party to celebrate the prodigal son's return.

Not a bad deal, huh? Unless you're the other son, who worked hard for his father and avoided loose women but never got the big fiesta. He felt cheated, and it's hard to blame him.

People employed by automakers other than General Motors and Chrysler would be justified in feeling the same way. Last fall, facing bankruptcy, those companies sought and received some $17 billion in federal loans intended to keep them in business. Now they are back asking for more -- $16.6 billion for GM and $5 billion for Chrysler.

That doesn't count the $7.7 billion GM wants to improve fuel economy or the $5 billion its financial arm got from the Treasury Department. Nor does it exclude the possibility that they will demand more help in the future.

And what about the automakers that have not run themselves into the ground? They get nothing. Actually, they get worse than nothing: They get the privilege of competing not just against GM and Chrysler but against the federal government, which has unlimited resources and is now in full partnership with the two.

It's not just Ford, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Volkswagen and all the other companies that sell (and often build) cars here that are seeing their wisdom and restraint punished. It's also the American people -- most of whom voted with their pocketbooks not to support GM and Chrysler but now see their money forcibly diverted to those automakers anyway.

For years, Detroit has been relentlessly driving customers away. In 1985, the Big Three accounted for 80 percent of all the cars sold in this country. Today, their share of the market is just 43 percent.

Their high costs and inferior reputation for quality have hindered them in competition for some 30 years. So in good times and bad, they lag behind more efficient rivals.

The financial losses they've compiled recently convey an unmistakable message from consumers: We are no longer willing to buy your vehicles at a price that pays you to make them -- if we are willing to buy them at all. The Big Three had a fat inheritance, and they managed to blow it.

Their overseas competitors, by contrast, had to start from zero selling cars in the United States, find customers, prove the worthiness of their vehicles and dealers -- even, in many cases, build factories here and train American workers to meet their standards.

Some companies, foreign and domestic, couldn't hack it. You don't see dealers selling Ramblers, Fiats or Renaults anymore. But many did exactly what our capitalist system requires them to do, only to be rudely informed that the requirements have changed. Instead of being rewarded for their achievements, they now watch as the government rewards failure.

Helping these two automakers means harming the rest. The market for new cars has shrunk and it's not going to regain its old size anytime soon. By rescuing GM and Chrysler, the government is taking future sales away from competitors. If one automaker gets the fatted calf, another one will have to do without.

In a normal market economy, things would proceed differently. The weak firms would file for bankruptcy and be forced to take drastic measures to cut their costs. They would shrink even more than they proposed last week and might even shut down.

These developments would be a bad thing for their shareholders and employees but a good thing for consumers. Competing carmakers would have the chance to hire their workers, purchase their factories, take over their dealerships and attract their customers. The economy would also benefit, because resources Chrysler and GM were wasting would be used more productively.

Instead, the government has impeded this process -- managing a neat combination of bad economics and blatant unfairness. In 21st-century America, it's good to be the prodigal son.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: automakers; business; economy; stevechapman

1 posted on 02/22/2009 10:22:51 AM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dbz77

The Prodigal Son learned the error of his ways. Detroit?


2 posted on 02/22/2009 10:31:39 AM PST by Jumpmaster (America's epitaph: We were politically correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
The Big Three keep pointing to ‘Legacy Costs’ as the reason they cannot compete as if these costs were dumped on them by some aliens. The fact of these overhead costs is testament to the decades long mismanagement on the part of all three. The can was kicked down the road until the end of the road was reached.

BTW, if anyone thinks these Legacy Costs are unique to the Automakers I invite them to examine the full accounting of the balance sheets of the Fed/State/Local Gov’t entities. The only difference is that these entities have not yet reached the end of the road but the end is in sight - And it will be reached sooner than most expect. JMO

3 posted on 02/22/2009 10:32:10 AM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TCats
"BTW, if anyone thinks these Legacy Costs are unique to the Automakers I invite them to examine the full accounting of the balance sheets of the Fed/State/Local Gov’t entities. The only difference is that these entities have not yet reached the end of the road but the end is in sight - And it will be reached sooner than most expect. JMO'

Liberalism is dead and has been bankrupt for quite a while now. The politicals know this and with the help of the Marxist-Style-Media have simply kicked this can down the road so the ones currently in power don't get annihilated by the anger of the masses when the shit hits the fan. The "porkulus" is their final kicking of the can. It's gonna get ugly. Especially for THEM.

4 posted on 02/22/2009 12:15:29 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
“Liberalism is dead and has been bankrupt for quite a while now.”

I wish I could agree with this statement but I do not. In fact, the Libs are on a vote buying binge where they are trying to be all things to most of the Voters. Their arithmetic is well hidden and false but who is counting. What you say will be true in the future but by then it will be far to late for us and maybe for this generations children as well.

Instead they are engaged in a sophisticated Ponzi scheme where everyone suspects there is something wrong but each one, individually, is afraid to rock the boat, afraid to disrupt their (seeming) out-sized returns.

The arithmetic is simple but consciously ignored. A Dollar wasted in payments today is a claim of a Dollar )Plus interest) on future productivity. Most only see the Dollar received today and simply ignore the time of reckoning. Not very much different than rolling credit card balances forward until the inevitable day when they cannot be rolled further.

I am very certain Maddoff stands in admiration of the size and scope of this fraud.

5 posted on 02/22/2009 12:53:11 PM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TCats; Uncle Sham
“Liberalism is dead and has been bankrupt for quite a while now.”
I wish I could agree with this statement but I do not.

I have to agree with TCats here. Liberalism is definitely bankrupt, but it is far from dead.

6 posted on 02/22/2009 4:47:00 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi | 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | REAL Stimulus: Apply paddles, shout "CLEAR!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
For years, Detroit has been relentlessly driving customers away. In 1985, the Big Three accounted for 80 percent of all the cars sold in this country. Today, their share of the market is just 43 percent.
Their high costs and inferior reputation for quality have hindered them in competition for some 30 years. So in good times and bad, they lag behind more efficient rivals.

Well over 30 years. I bought my first new car in 1972. I couldn't afford anything American, so it was a choice between a VW bug (~24 MPG) and a Honda (42 MPG) a couple of hundred dollars less. I bought the Honda. 8 years later it was stolen at 170k miles, original engine. All Japanese cars since have been retired at 250k miles.

A few years later after my purchase, family members bought Pintos. Not only were they junk, sloppily assembled, not a one made it to 100k miles.

Since that purchase in '72 I married a "GM (exec) brat." Per her request we bought her a new '99 Jimmy. HUGELY better than the Pintos but a few cut corners in quality left me saddened. We'll probably buy Japanese here on out.

But the Stickemuporelse Bill is persuading me to hold off on early replacement of my '92 Suzuki-built 4WD -- it's by far the oldest car in the lot at work but it runs like a top, is fun to drive, and has almost 100k more miles to 250k and normal retirement.

7 posted on 02/22/2009 4:59:06 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi | 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | REAL Stimulus: Apply paddles, shout "CLEAR!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

“But the Stickemuporelse Bill is persuading me to hold off on early replacement of my ‘92 Suzuki-built 4WD — it’s by far the oldest car in the lot at work but it runs like a top, is fun to drive, and has almost 100k more miles to 250k and normal retirement.
“ — quite wise in the current environment. If it runs well, why replace it?


8 posted on 02/23/2009 1:43:23 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson