Sigh...Every day for how long do we have to put up with disappointment after disappointment from the Federal government and it's horribly greedy agencys...how long??
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: phatus maximus
No, let them keep doing it.
They’re setting the stage for a conservative revolution the likes of which we haven’t seen in decades.
2 posted on
02/18/2009 9:00:22 PM PST by
RockinRight
(Now it's my turn to have a psychotic, uncontrollable hatred for the President.)
To: phatus maximus
3 posted on
02/18/2009 9:01:51 PM PST by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: phatus maximus
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, the Obamacorns come up with an exhale tax! Great!
4 posted on
02/18/2009 9:01:51 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Have You Punched A Democrat Today? - Do it for the children.)
To: phatus maximus
Going after the plant vote
5 posted on
02/18/2009 9:02:04 PM PST by
bigbob
(-)
To: phatus maximus
Just until they mess with the bubbles in Bubba's beer. But they're only talking about regulating CO2. It's up to us to remind Bubba that the bubbles in his beer ARE CO2.
/johnny
7 posted on
02/18/2009 9:03:58 PM PST by
JRandomFreeper
(God Bless us all, each, and every one.)
To: phatus maximus
The decision...would have a profound impact on transportation, manufacturing costs and how utilities generate power.Well, this will really help the economy recover! /double sarcasm with cheese
10 posted on
02/18/2009 9:04:52 PM PST by
LibFreeOrDie
(Obama promised a gold mine, but he will give us the shaft.)
To: phatus maximus
to make a determination whether carbon dioxide is a pollutant that endangers public health and welfare, an order that the Bush administration essentially ignored despite near-unanimous belief among agency experts that research points inexorably to such a finding. Anyone who can watch "Great Global Warming Swindle" and still believe that is certifiably insane.
11 posted on
02/18/2009 9:05:05 PM PST by
FreepShop1
(www.FreepShop.com)
To: phatus maximus
Will I still be able to exhale?
14 posted on
02/18/2009 9:07:08 PM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
To: phatus maximus
I would regulate the ability of politicians (the ones who support this) to exhale.
15 posted on
02/18/2009 9:07:11 PM PST by
MtnClimber
(The "stimulous" will place tax payers into slavery as sheep to be fleeced by government parasites.)
To: phatus maximus
Sigh... That's going to cost you! Who knows how many greenhouse gasses you exhaled with that sigh!
17 posted on
02/18/2009 9:09:17 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
(The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
To: phatus maximus
We better start breathing a lot more and directly on plants. Not enough CO2, and there won’t be enough plants making the stuff WE breathe.
Has anyone thought of that? I like AIR on my planet! *Sustainable* air, and plenty of it!
(I hate that word “sustainable.”)
18 posted on
02/18/2009 9:10:35 PM PST by
Lauren BaRecall
(In my nightmare, Daschle pulled out my feeding tube and called me a "useless eater.")
To: phatus maximus
What I'm tired of is the phrase "greenhouse gas". It's not the gas in the greenhouse that makes it warm. It's the glass ceiling and lack of air flow - from a physics perspective, can it get more elementary than that?
Global Warming - PT Barnum would be so very, very proud.
To: phatus maximus
21 posted on
02/18/2009 9:15:27 PM PST by
phatus maximus
( John 6:29. Learn it, love it, live it.)
To: phatus maximus
She can’t say that it isn’t a pollutant for the same reason no one can prove that God doesn’t exist; how then will it be determined that she can state that the current science supports that it is without demonstrable evidence that’s its emission as a natural result of respiration of all living things and carbon fuels is currently causing measurable harm?
22 posted on
02/18/2009 9:20:39 PM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: phatus maximus
Will Lisa Jackson become the new Schrodinger?
24 posted on
02/18/2009 9:24:35 PM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: phatus maximus
More good news from our protectors inside the beltway. Soon nothing will be able to harm us.
To: phatus maximus; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; ...
27 posted on
02/18/2009 9:25:46 PM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Hope + Change = PORKULU$)
To: phatus maximus
This action is the TKO of the economy. The economic carnage will be deep and wide just like the regulations. Even in a good economy, the regulations would stagger the economy. The only way that the regulations will not knock out the economy is if the regulations are just show. With the EPA running the show, I doubt that the regulations will be just show.
To: phatus maximus
Don’t worry, there will be no industry left in the country for them to regulate.
To: phatus maximus
This is what comes from the
Wickard Commerce Clause.
"Our construction of the scope of congressional authority has the additional problem of coming close to turning the Tenth Amendment on its head. Our case law could be read to reserve to the United States all powers not expressly prohibited by the Constitution."
J. Clarence Thomas, Lopez
(pay attention, drug warriors)
35 posted on
02/18/2009 9:37:02 PM PST by
Ken H
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson