Skip to comments.
Pro-Abortion Republican Groups Announce New Partnership to Weaken GOP
Life News ^
| 2/13/09
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 02/14/2009 12:38:21 PM PST by wagglebee
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Two pro-abortion Republican groups have announced a newly-formed partnership designed to weaken the long-standing pro-life platform the GOP maintains. The Republican Majority for Choice and the WISH List (Women in the Senate and House) hope to team up to drag the party to the left.
Colleen Parro, the head of the Republican National Coalition for Life tells LifeNews.com about the new effort.
"Feeling scorned after eighteen years of trying and failing to remove the pro-life language from the Republican national platform, and with the last three Republican presidential administrations [taking a pro-life stance], pro-choice Republican women are trying to make a come-back," Parro said.
The two pro-abortion groups say they plan to continue the battle for personal freedoms and choice in the GOP.
Parro says that means they favor "getting rid of the pro-life plank and electing abortion-friendly candidates to office."
Last summer, the Republican Party's platform committee put together a new pro-life party platform that contains some of the strongest language ever condemning abortion and supporting legal protections for unborn children.
It stood in stark contrast to the pro-abortion plank Democrats approved at the behest of President Barack Obama.
The platform draws on the nation's founding documents as expressing the earliest support for human life but backs a Constitutional amendment to make those protections clear.
"Faithful to the first guarantee of the Declaration of Independence, we assert the inherent dignity and sanctity of all human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed," the final GOP platform draft says.
"We support a human life amendment to the Constitution, and we endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment's protections apply to unborn children," it added.
During the primary election campaign, exit polling data showed Republicans in most states took a pro-life position by wanting all or most abortions illegal.
Some 19 of 24 states with publicly-available data showed pro-life Republican majorities.
Former Maryland Lt. Governor Michael Steele, who is pro-life, was recently elected as the new chairman of the Republican Party.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; gop; gopplatform; moralabsolutes; prolife; rinos
The two pro-abortion groups say they plan to continue the battle for personal freedoms and choice in the GOP. Parro says that means they favor "getting rid of the pro-life plank and electing abortion-friendly candidates to office."
Yeah, well I favor throwing your asses out of the GOP.
1
posted on
02/14/2009 12:38:21 PM PST
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
2
posted on
02/14/2009 12:39:04 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Yeah why don’t they just register as Democrats if they want to kill babies.
3
posted on
02/14/2009 12:39:31 PM PST
by
omega4179
(1.20.13 end of an error , a big one.)
To: wagglebee
couldn’t agree more . . . throw the witches out of the GOP
4
posted on
02/14/2009 12:39:39 PM PST
by
txnativegop
(God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment) What do U do with unreasonable people?)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
5
posted on
02/14/2009 12:39:54 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
6
posted on
02/14/2009 12:40:50 PM PST
by
darkangel82
(I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
To: wagglebee
May they fail miserably..
7
posted on
02/14/2009 12:41:23 PM PST
by
JSDude1
(R(epublicans) In Name Only SUCK; D(emocrats) In Name Only are worth their weight..)
To: wagglebee
8
posted on
02/14/2009 12:43:17 PM PST
by
FrogMom
(Lord, help us all!)
To: wagglebee
9
posted on
02/14/2009 12:44:20 PM PST
by
SolidWood
("NO on the stimulus package" Governor Palin said.)
To: wagglebee
Of all the ideals the GOP stands for, I consider the pro-life issues to be the greatest foundation on which we stand. Those who don’t agree really should find another party instead of trying to “fix” this one.
10
posted on
02/14/2009 12:44:57 PM PST
by
Faith
To: wagglebee
And why are these people Republicans again? Pro-Life is part of the soul of the GOP, and that won’t change! The GOP IS a pro-life party!
Apparently, those RINOs are having a very difficult time admitting that, deep down inside, they are DEMOCRATS!!!! They need to all be thrown out of the party (and take Snowe, Collins and Specter with you, please!)!
11
posted on
02/14/2009 12:45:19 PM PST
by
wk4bush2004
(SARAH PALIN, 2012!!!!!!!)
To: wagglebee
Somebody had better throw them out - the libs are going to use this to try to further divide the GOP. I must admit, McCain et al rendered me much less-enthusiastic about the party, but this would be a bigger disaster. (I voted for Sarah and against His Zeroness, but not for Mc.)
12
posted on
02/14/2009 12:45:35 PM PST
by
ducdriver
(99% of liberals give the other 1% a bad name.)
To: wagglebee
Either the GOP remains the pro-life party or conservatives will bolt.
>>>>>"... electing abortion-friendly candidates to office."
Sounds like a strategy Michael Steele supports.
13
posted on
02/14/2009 12:50:23 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: Reagan Man
Sounds like a strategy Michael Steele supports. Yep.
I go back and forth on a daily basis trying to decide whether the GOP is worth saving or if conservatives should just leave. The more I read about how the GOP was formed by anti-slavery Whigs and how it became the dominant political party in just over a decade, the more I think it's time for conservatives to just leave.
14
posted on
02/14/2009 12:58:15 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Republican Majority for Choice How do they call themselves a "majority"?
According to OpenSecrets, the PAC takes in about $100,000 a year from about 20 people and
hands it out to the likes of Specter, Collins, Shays, and a dozen other less known RINOs.
15
posted on
02/14/2009 1:07:45 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: wagglebee
This is nothing more than another Straw Man or Red Herring of the Left. The Left is bent on destroying the Republican Party, and this is another tool they hope to use. It will go nowhere
16
posted on
02/14/2009 1:09:39 PM PST
by
antonico
To: wagglebee
If you are feeling “scorned” as republicans, why not join a party in which you will be loved and appreciated? Or is it just more fun to try to destroy the republican party!
17
posted on
02/14/2009 1:10:14 PM PST
by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: wagglebee
What are their numbers? Even in the northeast , they have virtually no influence. I think they can be ignored (if they “exist” at all)
To: wagglebee
They'll simmer down when President Palin signs the bill to significantly slash their taxes, while simultaneously ending fed handouts to Planned Parenthood and like orgs
19
posted on
02/14/2009 1:12:35 PM PST
by
jla
(Sarah! sarahpac.com)
To: wagglebee
The Republican Majority for Choice What a dumbass name. Too many oxymorons.
20
posted on
02/14/2009 1:13:22 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Have You Punched A Democrat Today? - Do it for the children.)
To: wagglebee
Throw the baby-murdering bitches out of the GOP, let the ‘Rats have ‘em.
Ronald Reagan said it best, when he said “most of these people in favor of abortion have already been born.”
21
posted on
02/14/2009 1:19:08 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American History. Barack 0bama is his second term.)
To: mkjessup
Ronald Reagan also said it perfectly here:
A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.
I do not believe I have proposed anything that is contrary to what has been considered Republican principle. It is at the same time the very basis of conservatism. It is time to reassert that principle and raise it to full view. And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way.
22
posted on
02/14/2009 1:24:08 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: omega4179
Yeah why dont they just register as Democrats if they want to kill babies. Same objective, but this is more effective.
Not unlike the de facto Democrats Collins, Snowe, and Specter, and how their (R) helps them do more damage.
.
23
posted on
02/14/2009 1:35:42 PM PST
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: wagglebee
I go back and forth on a daily basis trying to decide whether the GOP is worth saving or if conservatives should just leave. The more I read about how the GOP was formed by anti-slavery Whigs and how it became the dominant political party in just over a decade, the more I think it's time for conservatives to just leave.
Since the days of the Whigs, the two party structure in most of the several states have set up structures that make it much harder to form a viable third party than what existed in the 1850's.
There are a handful of approaches one could take. One would be a regional party that would caucus with or against the Republicans as circumstances dictated. Canada's Bloc Quebecois' power exceeds their numbers as the other major parties are forced to curry favor. Canada is a multi party system, however, so it is easier for them.
You would need an obscenely rich person to run for a key spot and directly or indirectly bankroll the whole thing. Ross Perot actually could have won the White House in '92 if he didn't wig out. I'm not recommending a Perot type, but individual rich people who are running for office are one of the few categories left mostly alone by the changes in law. They can hire the man power to get on the ballot, get poll numbers, and get media access.
If you tried to outright kill the Republican party, the cost would be so steep in the short term, that there might be no chance of getting a majority anywhere by the time the Trotskyites are done tinkering with the mechanics. Such tinkering is much more efficient and extensive today due to technology and the greater reach of government compared to 1850.
In my opinion, it would actually be easier to restart the Republicans. A lot of the bad guys are already gone. Some more are up in years. It was a mere six years after the debacle of Watergate in '74 that Reagan arose. People will blame Bush for the economic problems for about two years before they start to wonder when Obama is going to fix it. Obama has no intention of fixing it, which at this point can best be done by leaving things alone. People with money are not going to do anything with it until they see the risks and rewards with a rejiggered massive set of laws.
As far as the "pro-choice" Republicans. We can't stop them from running, so they should be primaried at every turn. Strategic 3rd party candidates to help defeat RINOs may be called for. Even that will have some very bad short term side effects.
24
posted on
02/14/2009 1:36:14 PM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: wagglebee
Sorry but you are not the majority and BW has anyone ever heard of either of these unknown groups?
To: chris_bdba
To: Dr. Sivana
Thanks, that was a great post. Your concerns about starting a new party are basically the same that I have had. Nevertheless, if the GOP doesn’t stage a dramatic turn-around in the 2010 midterm elections, that might just be the end.
27
posted on
02/14/2009 1:45:11 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: chris_bdba
By “not the majority” are you referring to me or these pro-death RINOs?
28
posted on
02/14/2009 1:45:56 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
The Kool-Aid drinking Party over principle crew will be here shortly.
29
posted on
02/14/2009 1:50:09 PM PST
by
arealconservativeforachange
(Tell JD Hayworth to run for McCain's seat! http://www.jdhayworth.com/contact.php)
To: wagglebee
There should be no need for a pro-life platform. There are laws against murder excepting self defense.
No person is more incapable of defending themselves than a baby in the womb.
30
posted on
02/14/2009 1:52:16 PM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car.)
To: wagglebee
There are no pro-baby killer conservatives.Should the GOP ever take pro-life out of their basic moral stances, that will be the real end of them. That must be exactly what those pro-death supposedly republican groups want.
31
posted on
02/14/2009 1:53:12 PM PST
by
TheConservativeParty
(Democrats are bastard coated bastards with bastard filling.)
To: wagglebee
Can the GOP go any lower? Even if it loses a third of the delegations, would anything change? GWB, as much as Hoover, has killed the GOP.
32
posted on
02/14/2009 1:55:24 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(GWB is gone: Now the American sheeple can sleep at night!)
To: Oldpuppymax
If you are feeling scorned as republicans, why not join a party in which you will be loved and appreciated? Or is it just more fun to try to destroy the republican party!'FEELING' Now that is liberal ease, Bama is always looking for people to keep his back seats on his buses warm, and you probably could get in realllllll cheap and might make a windfall under his stimulus conspiracy.
To: wagglebee
Hey, join another party. We don’t need this one screwed up any more than it already is. I know that’s what you want to do, but NO, Thanks!
To: Right Wing Assault
Same thing happened in 1992, figurehead a woman named Ann Stone. All she wanted to do was be on TV and then it became obvious that she had no interest in electing Republicans, after all. Maybe she’s resurfaced. I’m sure the MSM will give her another 15 minutes of fame.
35
posted on
02/14/2009 2:35:07 PM PST
by
Kanzan
To: wagglebee
Them, not us pro life folks. :)
To: omega4179
Yeah why dont they just register as Democrats if they want to kill babies.
Because they know the best way to destroy the Pro Life movement is to have it removed from the Republican platform. These people aren't Republicans. They're sleeper-cell activists and incompletely-reformed democrats.
37
posted on
02/14/2009 3:15:51 PM PST
by
CowboyJay
(Stop picking on Porkulus. He's not fat, he's just big-boned.)
To: All
38
posted on
02/14/2009 4:15:19 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
He really nailed it didn’t he!
To: wagglebee
That's why I said I don't give a damn about Repbulicans. I only care about Conservatives. We need a Conservative Party. If it takes forming a new party, so be it.
40
posted on
02/14/2009 8:55:14 PM PST
by
my_pointy_head_is_sharp
(We're living in the Dark Ages. The Totalitarians are on the rise!)
To: wagglebee
Pro-Abortion Republican Groups??
That’s as bad an oxymoron as a Catholic Democrat.
How can a Catholic be a Democrat when one of the main planks in their platform is to support and promote abortions?
41
posted on
02/14/2009 9:05:29 PM PST
by
Salvation
( With God all things are possible.)
To: JSDude1
When they meet their maker they will find out that they have failed miserable.
42
posted on
02/14/2009 9:06:49 PM PST
by
Salvation
( With God all things are possible.)
To: wagglebee
There is no way in hell that I will ever fail to oppose any Republican who advocates for murdering babies by abortion.
To: wagglebee
44
posted on
02/15/2009 3:54:23 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: jla
To: wagglebee
Both. Support pro-life principled Republicans wherever they run, and support third party candidates who are principled pro-lifers every time that the Republican running isn't a principled pro-lifer.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson