Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yazoo

Darwinian evolution requires far more faith than creation. Darwin was a med-school dropout turned amateur naturalist who presumed to rewrite the entire history of biology based on a few minor variations between finches. His book was not based on science, it was little more than a long argument based on almost no evidence. The majority of Darwinian/neo-Darwinian predictions have been so utterly falsified that even the Evos are abandoning the HMS Beagle in search of a new evolutionary ship. Creation Science, on the other hand, is as ship-shape as ever, battle tested, and ready to chase down the next materialistic theory that attempts to give blind chance credit for God’s creation.


10 posted on 02/07/2009 8:39:38 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts

That as it may be, not believing Darwin’s theories does not mean the only alternative is biblical creationism. I’m not sure what you mean by Creation Science, but if it means the earth was created 6 thousand years ago, sorry, I won’t accept it any more than Darwin.


11 posted on 02/07/2009 9:09:14 PM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson