Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vive La Revolution:Obama Brings Spirit Of The French Revolution To America
The Bulletin ^ | January 28, 2009 | Dr. Paul Kengor

Posted on 01/28/2009 7:47:31 AM PST by IbJensen

Last week, before an audience of millions of Americans, the new president made a telling statement. Alluding to the American founders, President Barack Obama, in his Inaugural Address, stated: “The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.”

This seemed to be a reference to the Declaration of Independence, or at least to the principles in that sacred political document.

On the surface, Mr. Obama certainly said nothing objectionable. The moment I heard those words, however, I immediately noticed — as did others who quickly commented — that Mr. Obama neglected two crucial things from the most famous line not only in the Declaration of Independence but in the essence of the American founding: 1) He left out the unalienable right to “Life;” and 2) He left out the words “created” and “Creator” — the God who “endows” that “Right,” a right which is a “self-evident” “truth.”

This slight was significant for many reasons. Chief among them, it is patently clear — as it was to the American founders — that one must have life before one can entertain liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That is why that quintessential right is so fundamental and unassailable, as theologians and political philosophers alike have long underscored in their admiration of the Declaration. Thomas Jefferson himself wrote that very line, which was preserved throughout the edits and revisions to Jefferson’s text by John Adams, Ben Franklin, and the entirety of the Continental Congress.

Even that, though, does not get to the heart of what Mr. Obama pronounced. Whether the new president — and his speechwriter and staff — realized it or not, he inter-mixed the core of the Declaration with the core slogan of the French Revolution: “liberty, equality, and fraternity.” He seems to have integrated the guiding document of the French Revolution, the Declaration of the Rights of Man, with the guiding document of the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence.

There, too, in the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the emphasis on “life” is replaced with “equality.” The word “life” is non-existent, as is the notion of a “Creator” of that life.

That was no accident by those who spearheaded the French Revolution. Robespierre and his Jacobins were secular, militantly atheistic, socialistic, even communistic. (Some historians have called the Jacobins the “first communists,” and Vladimir Lenin called his Bolsheviks “glorious Jacobins.”) The American founders, who read the French documents, saw the dangers endemic in the words of the French revolutionaries. As John Adams feared in a letter to Jefferson, “I know not what to make of a republic of thirty million atheists.”

The American founders understood what we need to understand: words and ideas matter. We should read and consider them carefully. What Obama said in his inaugural is, presumably, an expression of his view of America, of government, and, yes, literally of “Life.”

So, how could such a far-reaching mangling of the most famous quotation in American history take place before a massive crowd at the most hyped inaugural ever and few noticed or care? The answer is the failure of American education, from K-12 to higher ed. On that, I will wrap up with two examples, one negative and one positive:

In Cupertino, Calif., in November 2004, a fifth-grade teacher, Steven Williams, was barred from giving students historical American documents that mention God, including the Declaration of Independence. “It’s a fact of American history that our founders were religious men, and to hide this fact from young fifth-graders … is outrageous and shameful,” protested Mr. Williams’ attorney. “Williams wants to teach his students the true history of our country.”

The teacher’s mistake was to teach the truth — an inconvenient, unwelcome truth. Ironically, such prevention of truth has produced precisely the kind of Americans incapable of recognizing the political-historical revisions on display before them in Mr. Obama’s Inaugural Address.

Compounding the problem, in the case of the Inaugural Address, is that even fewer Americans — needless to say — learned anything about the devastating secular-atheism that was the thrust of the French Revolution.

On the positive side, there are rare institutions, like Grove City College, where students learn these things. Specifically, every Grove City College student is required to take the six-course Humanities curriculum that exposes these and other crucial concepts. In the final installment of that curriculum, the course, “Huma 302,” or Modern Civilization in International Perspective, which I teach with several other professors, I start with the American Revolution and the French Revolution, where we read — word for word — the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of Man. Our students know the difference.

To try to export this instruction beyond the walls of our college, the Center for Vision and Values hosts an American Founders Lecture Series quarterly in Pittsburgh. We recognized this dire need before Jan. 20.

Yet, we are a mere drop in the sand in the arid desert that is American education. Thanks to decades of terrible teaching, and a blatant rejection of many fundamental beliefs of the founders, we are now reaping the desiccated fruit. It tastes awfully bitter, and a long period of wandering is upon us.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: barrysoretoes; bho44; communism; creator; equality; france; frenchrevolution; jacobins; lenin; life; obama; obomba; robespierre; secularism; vladimirlenin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: IbJensen
I always knew that Obombast was a joke!

Now we can call him Laff_at_hee!

I'm not sure where the accent goes but his administration is already quite spicey! He already has to Biden his Thyme and maybe alittle cheesey fondue, (OMIGOSH), a cheese joke to boot!

21 posted on 01/28/2009 8:22:55 AM PST by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“The answer is the failure of American education, from K-12 to higher ed.”

Absolutely right.


22 posted on 01/28/2009 8:27:20 AM PST by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Those guillotined also included Christians in general and Catholics in particular. Priests and religious were executed just for the fact that they were Catholic. During the Reign of Terror, the streets literally ran with blood, as the executions were non-stop throughout the daylight hours. The atheist movement within the Revolution was successful in even wiping out vestiges of Chrisitanity in the calendar, by redoing it with 10-day weeks (so that Sunday could not be kept), different month names, and different day names.

The book “To Quell the Terror: The Mystery of the Vocation of the Sixteen Carmelites of Compiegne Guillotined July 17, 1794” by William Bush is a vivid illustration of just exactly what went on during the Reign of Terror. Unlike some accounts of the French Revolution which have portrayed it as some kind of noble endeavor, this book utilizes eye-witness accounts and historical facts to show the violent destruction - which was horrific.

“Dialogues des Carmélites,” a French opera by Francis Poulenc is another recounting of the story of the Martyrs of Compiegne.

Obama’s insistance on the destruction of babies in the womb makes him today’s version of Robespierre, and the pro-abortion Democrats are the Committee of Public Safety. Nancy Pelosi’s comment that the economy would be helped by preventing babies from being born is in the same mindset as Robespierre’s statement that “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country’s most urgent needs.” 5 Feb. 1794


23 posted on 01/28/2009 8:40:59 AM PST by nanetteclaret (Blessed Martyrs of Compiegne, Pray for Us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Well, we already have rObespierre.


24 posted on 01/28/2009 8:42:39 AM PST by depressed in 06 (Dope in chains, the Chicago way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2173442/posts


25 posted on 06/18/2010 8:50:11 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray, Pray, Pray. Stop Barrystroika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bttt


26 posted on 07/23/2012 3:23:58 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

It was disgusting that Obama would channel the French Revolution, and nearly remake America into the ASSR or even Jacobin Country. And it is also disgusting that they did not teach the effects of militant atheism in school and how they tried to exterminate us Christians. My own uncle, who is very liberal, went over to the USSR while working under the Carter administration, and witnessed first-hand how some Christians were nearly arrested in the church, with him nearly acting as an unwitting accomplice to those Communists. It was only after seeing them hiding that he essentially said it wasn’t the church he was looking for, and had a newfound appreciation of freedom of religion.

To be fair to Obama, however, Thomas Jefferson actually was involved in the writing of both the Declaration of Independence (as we all know) and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (which probably isn’t all that well known), and in fact, it was that as well as his acting as ambassador to France at the time that was the reason Jefferson was not involved in the creation of the Constitution. As a matter of fact, Jefferson was a pretty huge fan of the Jacobins and their excesses, actually defending the Reign of Terror and September Massacres rather tastelessly, even when his fellow founding fathers already were beginning to have disgust for the French Revolution. Jefferson wasn’t exactly one of my most fondest of founding fathers anyway.


27 posted on 02/16/2018 6:09:04 PM PST by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Like to see Obama get his turn on “Le Rasoir National”.


28 posted on 02/16/2018 6:10:34 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson