Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FocusNexus
What does a year of anti-HIV cocktails go for today? Was that used as a reference figure to avoid alienating the gay voters?

My 28 year old son just found out that his pacemaker battery has about 3 months of life left. The pacemaker was implanted in 1997. He is unemployed. The new battery will cost $4,000. The current game plan is to sell his vehicle to raise the money in time.

The "rationing" here is what the government will pay. I didn't see any limitations on what a private individual or insurance carrier can pay.

10 posted on 01/19/2009 11:37:49 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Myrddin
What does a year of anti-HIV cocktails go for today?

Sodomy and its diseases are politically correct. Living past your working years isn't.

13 posted on 01/19/2009 11:42:42 PM PST by Mojave (Own a pit bull; own the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Myrddin

“The “rationing” here is what the government will pay. I didn’t see any limitations on what a private individual or insurance carrier can pay.”

As I read the article, what it says about what’s in the bill, it says the government will restrict doctors about what they can prescribe, period, it didn’t say anything about who pays for it. This is worse than Hillary care.


17 posted on 01/19/2009 11:45:46 PM PST by FocusNexus ("Good and evil are present in this world, and between the two there can be no compromise." GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Myrddin

You write “The “rationing” here is what the government will pay. I didn’t see any limitations on what a private individual or insurance carrier can pay.”

I don’t know about that — the article says “He’s also called for a “federal health board” modeled on the Federal Reserve to rate medical products and create central controls on access.” It sounds like the government might make it illegal to manufacture them.


40 posted on 01/20/2009 3:27:08 AM PST by Old_Grouch (61 and AARP-free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Myrddin
The "rationing" here is what the government will pay. I didn't see any limitations on what a private individual or insurance carrier can pay.

Not in Round One. But at some point soon, the deadbeats, welfare queens, and every tree-hugging leftest in line for a government handout will complain that private individuals and private insurance have better coverage and that's not fair, and they will demand equality, and the government will then prohibit people from buying better health care than the government allows in the medicaid system.

56 posted on 01/20/2009 10:50:26 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson