[Strategerist]

No, I think puffery is stuff that fills magazine pages. As opposed to real science, it’s mostly imagination.

This is based on extensive theoretical work by a variety of physicists and preliminary but compelling evidence from an incredibly sensitive, expensive, and elaborate scientific experiment.

Or did you not bother to read the article?

[Tarpon]

This is based on extensive theoretical work by a variety of physicists and preliminary but compelling evidence from an incredibly sensitive, expensive, and elaborate scientific experiment.

So is the AGW hoax ... And surly they didn't spend the 10s of billions these AGW hoaxers have wasted.

I read enough to know what puffery is. It's free country right now, believe what you want, when the proof arrives, I will look at that. I don't discount the possibility, I just say prove it.

I saw a UFO once ... And I have my own hypothesis, which I can't prove, about UFOs.

Did you know that Einstein refused to believe in the notion of the expanding universe?