To: SunkenCiv; LucyT; soccer8; Morgan in Denver; Clintonfatigued; Grampa Dave; BIGLOOK
Is Hollywood insensitive to the needs of low-income Americans on affordable energy ?
2 posted on
12/31/2008 6:11:47 PM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
and the needs of low income working families costs for milk and beef with the cow fart tax.
3 posted on
12/31/2008 6:13:11 PM PST by
omega4179
(Bush Abandoned Ramos and Compean)
To: colorcountry; Utah Binger; rellimpank
Robert Redford can develop a ski resort, bulldoze the mountain for ski runs, and then tell the rest of us how bad we are for the environment.
5 posted on
12/31/2008 6:16:50 PM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
Does a bear make doodie in the woods?
6 posted on
12/31/2008 6:17:39 PM PST by
ZirconEncrustedTweezers
(Some people like cupcakes better. I, for one, care less for them.)
To: george76
Hollyweird is sensitive to “the planet” they are not concerned about unintended consequences.
11 posted on
12/31/2008 6:22:14 PM PST by
Ditter
To: george76
Is Hollywood insensitive to the needs of low-income Americans on affordable energy ?
Ahh....Yes!
It always amazes me that the elites in society are actors, on and off screen.
35 posted on
12/31/2008 7:34:21 PM PST by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
To: george76
I like it. It’s for the children, don’t cha’ know.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson