Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana Men File Lawsuit To Challenge Obama's Eligibility
WRTV Indianapolis / The Associated Press ^ | December 25, 2008

Posted on 12/25/2008 7:28:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

INDIANAPOLIS -- Two Indiana men filed a lawsuit claiming that President-elect Barack Obama is not eligible to serve as president.

The suit questions whether Obama meets the constitutional requirement that the president must be a "natural born citizen."

Obama's birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii, but his father was not a U.S. citizen and some have claimed the document is a fake.

The U.S. Supreme Court this month refused without comment to hear a challenge to Obama's citizenship.

The Indianapolis Star reports the Indiana suit was filed in Marion Superior Court in Indianapolis by Steve Ankeny, New Castle, and Bill Kruse, Roselawn.

(Excerpt) Read more at theindychannel.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: 1realbc; 911truthers; abcisallwewant; ankeny; barackobama; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; citizenship; getalife; in2008; judiciary; kruse; lawsuit; notthisshiitagain; obama; obamatruthfile; obci; rinobullies; tinfoilhats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-152 next last
If any of these cases actually take hold, it'll make Bush vs. Gore look like a schoolyard tussle.
1 posted on 12/25/2008 7:28:41 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama's birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii, but his father was not a U.S. citizen and some have claimed the document is a fake.

No one has seen his birth certificate. The media does not seem to understand this.

2 posted on 12/25/2008 7:31:01 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How about I pretend I’m barack Obama? I could take the oath with no proof as well.


3 posted on 12/25/2008 7:31:40 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama's birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii, but his father was not a U.S. citizen and some have claimed the document is a fake.

Since the author of this piece is not shown, we can't ask her/him if she/he has actually seen a certified paper copy of Barack's long form birth certificate, aka Certificate of Live Birth. Or for that matter even a certified paper copy, with signature and raised seal, of his Certification of Live Birth.

I'd imagine not.

4 posted on 12/25/2008 7:33:44 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The hits just keep on comin!


5 posted on 12/25/2008 7:35:10 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Barack Helmsley Obama says: "We don't show documents. Only the little people have to show documents."

(Leona "Queen of Mean" Helmsley: "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes.")

6 posted on 12/25/2008 7:37:41 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Monkey see....monkey do....monkey rule...


7 posted on 12/25/2008 7:38:23 PM PST by OnTheDress (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He can make this go away........can’t he?


8 posted on 12/25/2008 7:38:57 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
No one has seen his birth certificate.

I'm pretty sure I saw it yesterday. Being dumped from a box into the Pacific.

9 posted on 12/25/2008 7:41:33 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’d love to see that go somewhere.

But Satan protects his own.

Which raises an interesting question. Just suppose he is deemed ineligible. What happens?

Does Biden get in by default?

Does McCain get in by default/forfeit?

Do we have another election and keep Bush until that’s settled?

Does the Speaker of the House take over for a time?


10 posted on 12/25/2008 7:41:59 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

You said — “He can make this go away........can’t he?”

Yeah, once he’s sworn in, all the court cases go away, because a court can’t do anything to Obama after that...

So..., as I’ve proposed to several Freepers in the past, Freepers in several different states need to get a law on the books that requires the Secretary of State to require proof from a Presidential Candidate, regarding meeting the Constitutional qualifications, before he can be put on the ballot. If he can’t prove his qualifications, then he won’t be on the ballot and the state’s electors will be prevented from casting their ballots for that candidate (again, by that state law).

If we get several states to do this — this will take care of the Obama situation in the next election.


11 posted on 12/25/2008 7:43:21 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: metmom
What happens?

Riots. Target practice.

And those would be the least of what we would eventually see.

12 posted on 12/25/2008 7:43:29 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: metmom

You said — “Which raises an interesting question. Just suppose he is deemed ineligible. What happens?”

There’s not enough time between now and the time Obama is sworn in. Once he is sworn in, a court can do nothing to remove him from office. And I wouldn’t count on the Democrats to remove him from office by impeachment either (or else someone believes in Santa Claus if they think the Democrats are going to do that...).


13 posted on 12/25/2008 7:45:03 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Yes, but I don’t want president biden, I do not want president McSenile, I do not want president nancy poopsi...this country has a serious dirth of leadership at this time! They are all bums!


14 posted on 12/25/2008 7:47:36 PM PST by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: allmost

You know, you might have an idea there!

A whole bunch of brave citizens could show up on Inaugural day, and say they are BHO, ready to take the oath. They could present downloaded and printed COLBs.

Could the real BHO stand up and present the real certificate?

It would probably help if they were “latte” colored, but hey, even whiteys might try.

Just late for me on Christmas day, so forgive my idiotic nonsense. We all know the SS wouldn’t let anyone close to the podium. Aren’t we in a fine fix?


15 posted on 12/25/2008 7:47:42 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: metmom; All
I wrote an email to Cong. Tom Price's personal email tonight reminding him that HE has standing to challenge the eligibility of Hussein Obama.

When the House convenes they must accept the Electoral College votes and determine the eligibility of the candidates. Having done so they will count the EC's votes.

If any Congressman objects they can hold hearings. If they refuse to do so the Congressmen would have standing to Petition the SCOTUS to enforce the Constitution.

I told him he could be the hero if he wants.

We'll see what he does.

To answer your question though, if Hussien can't serve as President, BIDEN would become President and would appoint a VP who would be confirmed by the Senate. JH

16 posted on 12/25/2008 7:48:25 PM PST by politicalmerc (NObama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

The democrats have a lot of constitutional irons in the fire. The GOP should be raising 6 different kinds of hell over this but they don’t.

http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/


17 posted on 12/25/2008 7:48:39 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I say Kudos to these men; and all who wave this ‘red flag/warning re his citizenship; because no matter what one thinks - (I think Obama is a total fraud; by every measure)it nonetheless takes some courage to put oneself ‘out there’!


18 posted on 12/25/2008 7:51:13 PM PST by cricket (America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If any of these cases actually take hold

Never gonna happen. The fix is so far in it would take a colonoscopy to find it.

19 posted on 12/25/2008 7:51:13 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Ronald Reagan had a vision of America. Barack Obama has a vision of Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacquej

I didn’t think I had an idea, until I reread your response :). I’m a bit too light skinned to pass for bambi...


20 posted on 12/25/2008 7:51:53 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

To eliminate the purpose of the Electoral College in one’s own state is sort of diminishing the significance of one’s state in the national vote. The other states who still keep the same Electoral College voting procedure intact — they end up gaining more *significance* overall.

So, if California split their Electoral College vote to make it like the popular vote — this would *open the door* bigtime to the Republicans in that state. That means California would *dilute* its significance on election day by doing this.

That’s why I don’t expect this to go very far with those big states. And furthermore, if the smaller states do it, then they eliminate themselves form candidates campaigning there, because it won’t be a “winner take all” situation.

The only way it works “okay” for the Democrats is if they get *all the states* to do it — at once — before the next election.


21 posted on 12/25/2008 7:54:00 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc

I believe it takes a congressman and a senator to object. I think in 2000 one of the congressmen did file an objection but it died as no senator went along....I’m afraid we don’t have any senators that will go along and force the issue this time. We are doomed!


22 posted on 12/25/2008 7:54:28 PM PST by Froggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

suspicious fire at Jackson 5’s house today
(according to drudge)

birth certificate and all leverage the Jackson 5 family had is now gone...


23 posted on 12/25/2008 7:54:29 PM PST by OL Hickory (Where is the America I knew as a boy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
The article referenced the Indianapolis Star as a source -
Indianapolis Star Article
It names Tim Evans as the author. Their 'expert' doubts the case will succeed because of 'lack of standing'.

If US citizens do not have standing, WHO does ????????
24 posted on 12/25/2008 7:57:22 PM PST by Visceral (The more I learn, the less I know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: allmost

dark-face make-up?


25 posted on 12/25/2008 7:59:18 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Big if.

So far SCOTUS hasn’t shown the interest or stomach for taking on such a case.

I hope they do, but I’m not holding my breath.


26 posted on 12/25/2008 8:01:27 PM PST by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Two Indiana men filed a lawsuit claiming that President-elect Barack Obama is not eligible to serve as president.

I concur, however with the mindset that the majority of voters are illegitimate by reason of insanity for voting for him in the first place.

27 posted on 12/25/2008 8:01:42 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Don’t be so quick to write it off. As I read it here in Michigan it creates coalitions of states that combine their electoral votes and require ALL electors to vote for the popular winner overall.

If we vote overwhelmingly republican in Michigan, but say Indiana and Ohio vote democrat, our electors go to the winner of all 3 states combined.

It passed here in the house before anyone even knew about it. 4 states have already made it law, 4 more have passed it in both houses, and 6 have already passed it in one house.


28 posted on 12/25/2008 8:01:58 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: allmost

The following came from http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2154017/posts

But sources inside the White House say that Bush has mentioned several scenarios which could ultimately postpone the swearing in of President-elect Obama. (emphasis added)

This has never been explained any further.


29 posted on 12/25/2008 8:02:14 PM PST by yorkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
Would it be More illegal than that?
30 posted on 12/25/2008 8:03:25 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Ohhh..., I’ll have to go back and look at that one again. I didn’t realize this very strange method that they are using. That doesn’t sound good at all.

Thanks for calling it to my attention. I haven’t seen any threads specifically about this. Have they been posted before?


31 posted on 12/25/2008 8:03:53 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

too late. Plus they don’t have standing.


32 posted on 12/25/2008 8:05:47 PM PST by Perdogg (01-20-2013 Obama's last day - If we survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

You are right.


33 posted on 12/25/2008 8:07:02 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: metmom

The electors voted already. The only way that this could be challenged is through one Senator and one Congressman.


34 posted on 12/25/2008 8:07:11 PM PST by Perdogg (01-20-2013 Obama's last day - If we survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oblowma is hoping that he’ll get away with being illegal—and as soon as this blows up and finally has hard evidence my friends won’t have a leg to stand on with their “you’re crazy there’s no proof” bulls@%t.


35 posted on 12/25/2008 8:08:14 PM PST by rationalrepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froggie
You are correct. Barbara Boxcutter supported a challenge to the Ohio EV in 2004. The Challenge was rejected in both houses.
36 posted on 12/25/2008 8:08:22 PM PST by Perdogg (01-20-2013 Obama's last day - If we survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jacquej

It would make more of an impact if all shades, races and genders showed up to claim to be him.


37 posted on 12/25/2008 8:08:23 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Visceral

You asked — “If US citizens do not have standing, WHO does ???????? “

In practice..., no one knows and no one has been able to find out in a legal case yet...


38 posted on 12/25/2008 8:08:48 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

The federal courts will not touch this because they men have NO standing.


39 posted on 12/25/2008 8:09:49 PM PST by Perdogg (01-20-2013 Obama's last day - If we survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Man, can’t I just eat my waffel?”


40 posted on 12/25/2008 8:14:38 PM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I found it interesting that Obama took the time to describe ingreat detail his BC in one of his books. Sort of preemptive.

Well, God bless these new patriots of liberty. I hope in the generations to come their names are part of our history as the two who withstood the tide of evil.


41 posted on 12/25/2008 8:16:17 PM PST by stockpirate (My Beeber is on full stun as the site appears to be over run with trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

Supposedly Leona never said that. It was an invention of the mind of a recalcitrant servant.


42 posted on 12/25/2008 8:36:47 PM PST by Theodore R. (GWB is neither "compassionate nor conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

No, they’ll just be remembered as naysayers on the road to the socialist paradise the people of IN are awaiting.


43 posted on 12/25/2008 8:37:35 PM PST by Theodore R. (GWB is neither "compassionate nor conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

These cases seem to be continuously be sprouting up. It’s great. The more cases, the better. If it goes on for a while, something will have to break.

Newspapers, get a clue. You want readers, break a big story. This might be one.


44 posted on 12/25/2008 8:39:08 PM PST by CriticalJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Biden. See 25th amendment


45 posted on 12/25/2008 8:39:57 PM PST by Theodore R. (GWB is neither "compassionate nor conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Yeah, once he’s sworn in, all the court cases go away, because a court can’t do anything to Obama after that...

The president is above the law?

Interesting take on American democracy.

46 posted on 12/25/2008 8:43:44 PM PST by null and void (Petroglyphs. The original cliffs notes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.; metmom

You said — “Biden. See 25th amendment”

That can’t happen from any court action after Obama is sworn in, as it’s only the Congress that can impeach and convict a President after he’s sworn in. And I don’t expect the overwhelming Democrat Congress to do that, any more than it convicted Clinton...

And there is not enough time between now and the time for swearing in Obama, for a court to do a thing, in that case listed above.


47 posted on 12/25/2008 8:46:18 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

That was the whole point of putting out the forged document. It was not intended to fool anybody who actually looked at it. It was intended to provide journalists with something to REFER to in stories as a “birth certificate.”


48 posted on 12/25/2008 8:47:18 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This woman has a very good case if she could find a laywer willing to work for free. http://publish.indymedia.org/en/2008/12/918253.shtml

Hawaii Revised Statutes
HRS 0338-0020 0005.htm
(a) The department of health SHALL establish a HAWAII CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH for a person BORN IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY and child by adoptive parent or parents.

Hawaii Revised Statutes
HRS 0578-0014.htm
(b) If a NEW BIRTH CERTIFICATE... is issued, the
ORIGINAL birth certificate SHALL be SEALED.

Well, Obama’s BC WAS sealed.

Not only that but Hawaii cant just willy nilly be giving out new BC’s to foreign people and sealing the original.


49 posted on 12/25/2008 8:48:53 PM PST by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ

You said — “If it goes on for a while, something will have to break.”

Here’s the thing with that — and these court cases. There are only a very few more days that a court can say anything. And the length of time that these cases take just for *one step* along the process — is longer than the time to Obama’s swearing in.

And once Obama is sworn in, then any court case is “moot” and it won’t rule on any issue like this, because it *then* become an issue that *only* Congress can take up. And I don’t expect an overwhelming Democrat Congress to do a thing, any more than what came out of Clinton’s mess...

All court cases are *dead* after Obama is sworn in — in terms of “removing Obama” from office.


50 posted on 12/25/2008 8:49:24 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson