Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gazprom to control Serbia's oil
BBC ^

Posted on 12/24/2008 9:43:51 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic

Russia and Serbia have signed a controversial energy deal that will hand Russian gas giant Gazprom control of NIS, Serbia's oil monopoly.

Under the deal, Gazprom is to build a gas pipeline through Serbia and an underground gas storage facility there.

Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev and his Serbian counterpart Boris Tadic signed the agreement in Moscow.

The plan is for Serbia to host part of a new pipeline called South Stream, to deliver Russian gas to southern Europe. Gazprom is taking a 51% stake in NIS for 400m euros (£380m; $560m), officials say.

Diplomatic tensions

Both countries signed an energy co-operation agreement in January, but the details have only just been finalised. Belgrade had delayed signing because a small party in Serbia's ruling coalition had argued that the terms on offer to Gazprom were too generous.

Critics say Russia's pledges to build South Stream by 2015 are not firm enough, given the current economic downturn. South Stream is designed to take Russian gas under the Black Sea to Bulgaria and then to Serbia for transit towards the lucrative markets of southern Europe.

Washington and the European Union are backing a rival pipeline project called Nabucco, to bring gas from Central Asia, which would bypass Russia.

Correspondents say the planned pipeline could undermine the European efforts, which aim to reduce European dependency on Russian gas. Serbia's energy diplomacy is complicated by the fact that Nabucco has EU backing - yet Serbia wants to join the EU.

Political tensions over Kosovo are also a complicating factor, with the EU supporting Kosovo's independence, while Belgrade and Moscow insist the territory remains part of Serbia.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: clintonswar; eu; gazprom; kosovo; nato; oil; pipeline; russia; serbia

1 posted on 12/24/2008 9:43:51 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic

Nice move on Serbia’s part to get back at the EU for what went down in Kosovo. Check, checkmate.


2 posted on 12/24/2008 9:59:52 PM PST by flaglady47 (Four years of captivity, no relief in sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic

Thanks for posting the article.


3 posted on 12/24/2008 10:00:25 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
Correcto. Serbia's desire to join the EU is dubius also. The whole reason for the Toon War was to force an independently minded Yugoslavia into the EU and away from the Rooskies.

yitbos

4 posted on 12/24/2008 10:23:36 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic

The Oily Tracks Running Through Kosovo

Michael Savage

November 30, 1999

Kosovo was about oil and nothing but oil, with maybe some uranium thrown in and a dash of “wag-the-dog.” And you thought it was to save the poor Kosovar Albanians.

Of all the ethnically “cleansed” peoples around the world, some numbering in the millions, the beneficent powers of NATO decided to draw the line with the Kosovar Albanians. About 2,000 of the ethnic Albanians had been reportedly killed by Serbs in the last several years, so it was time for the humanitarian guard to take action.

No matter that about as many Serbs had been killed by the Albanians, and that Kosovo is a part of the sovereign state of Yugoslavia, and that this conflict had been ongoing for centuries. Big Oil required a pipeline through Kosovo and the poor Serbs just happened to own the wrong real estate at the wrong time.

How do I know that the Kosovo action was about oil or, to be exact, about establishing a safe haven for an oil pipeline? Just recently Bill Clinton signed an historic agreement with Azerbaijan on this very matter. Azerbaijan is one of the former Soviet republics that became a separate country with the breakup of the USSR. Formerly, Caspian oil would have come into the world market as a Soviet export but not anymore. It now comes under the flag of this newly independent nation via Turkey where it is transshipped by way of Turkish seaports. And Russia has been deftly unlinked from the world oil market.

Now, keen interest in Azerbaijani oil is nothing new. The Germans have had a compelling interest in this oil going back to 1905 and extending through the two world wars up to and including the present. One of Hitler’s primary goals in his push to the east was to capture the Azerbaijani oil fields. But where the Kaiser and Nazi Germany failed, it seems the New World Order — featuring Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, and other socialists — is going to succeed. The plan is now to route the oil in a way that will fulfill Germany’s long-sought-after objective.

Here is how the oil is going to run. It starts from the oil fields of Baku, Azerbaijan’s capital on the Caspian Sea. It is piped from there across Azerbaijan and Georgia through Turkey. But the plan of Clinton, and the rest of the present-day Neue Ordnung, is now to have it piped from Turkey directly through Bulgaria. In this way it can reach the Danube and the Adriatic Sea — the Danube being a direct route to Germany and the Adriatic bringing it much closer to Western Europe. And Russia is expected to look on, while it’s being aced out of this highly lucrative action.

But before reaching the Danube and the Adriatic, as you’ve probably guessed, the pipeline must first go from Bulgaria through Yugoslavia and Kosovo! Slobodan Milosevich, however, has had other plans for oil shipment through his country that are more to his liking (and Russia’s) and was unwilling to cooperate with this scenario. The NATO socialists were attacking Russia, by proxy, in stealing Kosovo from Serbia.

Now it begins to make sense, doesn’t it? The reason becomes clear why, of all the ethnic and religious oppression in the world, NATO chose this area tucked away in the Balkans for its ground-leveling “humanitarian” aid. And why the One World media places Slobodan Milosevich, a small-time local tyrant, alongside Hitler and Stalin.

During the shameful and cowardly NATO bombing of the historic bridges across the Danube River, the mouthpieces of the Government-Media complex ceaselessly propagandized. Jamie Shea, the English soccer thug; James Rubin, Mad Half-Bright’s Stooge; Solana, the Spanish socialist; an unnamed Luftwaffe general; and others continued the Big Lie. They were bombing Serbian civilians (hospitals, schools, trains, powerplants, apartments, orphanages) to save Albanians!

They were also destroying Kosovo to save it. These international war criminals were led by General Wesley Clark (a Rhodes Scholar from Arkansaw) who clicked his shiny heels for the commander-in-grief, Bill Clinton (another Rhodes Scholar from Arkansaw).

But the greatest shame must fall upon the tendentious media hacks. ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox, and most columnists of the neo-right all fell in line: “The criminal bombing was just. It was to save the innocent ‘ethnic’ Albanians from the evil [non-ethnic] Serbs.” Have you now heard one of these hacks apologize or admit they were duped? Used by Big Oil to apologize for, no, to justify, NATO war crimes?

Even their “reportage” on the recent demonstrations of more than 25,000 Greek citizens was biased. Both by under-reporting the number (”hundreds,” blared the San Francisco Examiner) and by ascribing the legitimate protests against Clinton’s war crimes to “communists” and anti-American sentiment going back to the 1970s!

With the NATO presence in Kosovo, the way is now clear for the pipeline — and for the ethnic Albanians to ethnically cleanse the province of the remaining, helpless Kosovar Serbs, Gypsies, and Jews. To make the world safe for Big Oil’s trans-Kosovo pipeline.


5 posted on 12/24/2008 10:24:39 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Stupid move. Serbia’s state-run oil monopoly just became Russia’s state-run oil monopoly. Serbia has completely disregarded its own country’s interests. Would the Russians allow a foreign power to control their own oil industry? Of course not. They are not that stupid.


6 posted on 12/24/2008 10:30:37 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Serbia has good reason to join both NATO and the EU. If they are a member of NATO for example, then NATO can't bomb them again. Next year Albania will be a member of NATO. It's not in Serb interests for Albania to be in NATO but not Serbia. Albania is not in the EU. If Serbia gets in before them, then they may be able to keep Albania out. Also, the EU has not recognized Kosovo as an independent nation. If Serbia gets in the EU before Kosovo then they can prevent the EU from ever recognizing Kosovo independence. The case of Cyprus is instructive. Cyprus is a member of the EU and the EU considers the whole island part of the EU, even though the Turkish separatists in north Cyprus, like Kosovo, are not recognized by the UN or the EU. If the EU is going to take over from NATO in Kosovo, then by joining the EU, Serbia may regain some control over their lost territory.
7 posted on 12/24/2008 10:54:52 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Serbia has good reason to join both NATO and the EU.

Yeah and piss off the only freind they ever had the Russians??? Russia has stood by Serbia for centuries. Russia has stood by them even when NATO led by Bill Klintoon, was boming them into submission.

Why should Serbia make nice nice with NATO and the west.

You dont kiss the people trying to kill you.

8 posted on 12/24/2008 11:56:25 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon (America land soon to be of the enslaved...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
Nice move on Serbia’s part to get back at the EU for what went down in Kosovo. Check, checkmate.

Oh yeah. Great move. Ranks up there with the teenaged girl getting knocked up by the biggest thug in town to get back at her parents.

Just brilliant.

9 posted on 12/25/2008 1:28:51 AM PST by Cheburashka (Liberalism: a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
Yeah and piss off the only freind they ever had the Russians???

When Putin's Russia is your only friend, it's time to start reviewing your past actions to see what you've been doing wrong.
10 posted on 12/25/2008 1:33:04 AM PST by Cheburashka (Liberalism: a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka
OK. Serbia negotiates with the Rooskies in order to get EU to make them a member sooner rather than later?

yitbos

11 posted on 12/25/2008 2:36:05 AM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Serbia negotiates..

And, Ratko Mladic?

12 posted on 12/25/2008 3:03:49 AM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

—Nice move on Serbia’s part to get back at the EU for what went down in Kosovo. Check, checkmate.—

Yup. Can’t blame Serbia for being ticked off at the EU (and the USA, for that matter), given recent history.


13 posted on 12/25/2008 5:48:29 AM PST by seatrout (I wouldn't know most "American Idol" winners if I tripped over them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka
They have done nothing wrong except be Christian and fight against Muslims for their land. And the US Bombed them for that.

Sorry the U.S. is on the wrong side of this conflict.

14 posted on 12/25/2008 8:38:46 AM PST by ColdSteelTalon (America land soon to be of the enslaved...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
What good did being friends with the Russians ever do for Serbia? It sure didn't help them keep Kosovo. Yeltsin sent peacekeepers to Kosovo but Putin pulled them out and refuses to send them back. Even the Serb ultra-nationalist Tomislav Nikolic supports Serb membership in the EU. He understands it's in Serbia's interests. Serbia needs to worry about what's best for themselves, not about Russia's interests.
15 posted on 12/25/2008 3:13:45 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Well, truth is just th eopposite. Pro-western government and pro-western president Boris Tadić signed the deal with the Russians. He actually insisted on the deal. Truth to be told, there are no more major pro-western parties in Serbia left. Democrates of Boris tadić were last remaining, and they are dissilusioned about EU. As for Tomislav Nikolić, he just made move from far right to right. He is also for gas deal. Now in Serbia they all talk "Ey, we still want to join EU, but also want to be friends with Russia" "EU only" clup fall apart.
16 posted on 12/26/2008 1:32:46 AM PST by kronos77 (Kosovo is Serbian Jerusalem. No Serbia without Kosovo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson