"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Who says that Moonbeam isn’t a crazy leftist idiot?
Like a good marxist, the peoples’ votes don’t mean a thing if he doesn’t like they way it goes.
Wow, Jerry Brown is in favor of gay marriage? Who would have thought?
Prop 8 will not survive, regrettably.
“Proposition 8 must be invalidated because the amendment process cannot be used to extinguish fundamental constitutional rights without compelling justification,” Mr. Brown said in a statement.
Oh, yeah? That’s a hot one! Now ask him what he thinks of the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights of the U. S. Constitution, and be prepared to get out of the way quick, lest you be trampled as he backpedals.
What he really intends to communicate, of course, is that the law means only what Liberals want it to mean; no more, no less.
The liberals didn’t like it when Proposition 187 was passed so they simply got an activist court to get rid of it. They’ll do the same with Proposition 8. Done deal. It’s California, after all.
But really, who cares? It’s like worrying about inflation in Zimbabwe.
No point getting agita about it. Just follow your heart and flee if you can’t take it anymore.
Brown should recuse himself on this matter.
Yes, please void the peoples’ vote. We, the anointed elite, know so much more than the masses. And while we are at it, do away with those nasty elections and the Constitution. We cannot be held captive to old pieces of paper or to the people who put us in office./s
“Top Lawyer Urges Voiding California Proposition 8”
OOOOO....Top lawyer says so. Well that decides it then. If top lawyer says so I guess we will just have to void the results of Prop 8.(sarcasm)
So what if the people of California voted against the homosexual agenda.
The Dems will just use the courts to shove this immoral and sick lifestyle down our throats.
Some judges need hospital stays.
Translation: Jerry Brown advocates an end to the rule of law.
Mr. Brown's assertions are unjustifiable. He is clearly incompetent. His argument is unnatural and against the laws of nature. How does he tie marriage between males or between females to constitutional rights? Does an orange have the constitutional right to be an apple? Maybe an orange covets the apple because it can never be an apple. The insane covet what they cannot have.
To me and anyone else with common sense, it is clearly not a constitutional right to be granted that which can never be. What compelling justification does one need to show that a man is not a woman, that a marriage between a man and a man cannot produce children, or a marriage between a woman and a woman cannot produce children? To pretend otherwise is to mock and degrade what marriage is, a union between a man and a woman.
What fundamental constitutional rights is he talking about? There are no dots to connect in this false relationship.
How can an Ammendment to the California State Constitution be “Unconstitutional”? If this is so, then ths USSC could declare any Ammendment to the U.S. Constitution “Unconstitutional”. Say the First and Second Ammendments?
In 2006, “conservative” talk show host Michael Savage donated $5,000—the maximum allowable contribution—to Jerry Brown’s campaign. I hope he’s satisfied with what he got.