Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. Court: Would-be Good Samaritan can be sued
AP on SFGate.com ^ | 12/18/08 | Paul Elias - ap

Posted on 12/18/2008 6:07:14 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Proving that no good deed goes unpunished, the state's high court on Thursday said a would-be Good Samaritan accused of rendering her friend paraplegic by pulling her from a wrecked car "like a rag doll" can be sued.

California's Supreme Court ruled that the state's Good Samaritan law only protects people from liability if the are administering emergency medical care, and that Lisa Torti's attempted rescue of her friend didn't qualify.

Justice Carlos Moreno wrote for a unanimous court that a person is not obligated to come to someone's aid.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; goodsamaritan; lawsuit; ruling; sued; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
Unanimous.

May none of these Justices ever be trapped in a burning vehicle after a crash.. or they may experience a special kind of justice.

1 posted on 12/18/2008 6:07:14 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If that isn’t the truth. Here this person risked her life to pull a friend to safety, and what she gets for it is legal exposure. If that car would have blown up, we wouldn’t be contemplating the penalty for being a hero.

I’m not arguing that a person with possible spinal injuries should be moved unless not doing so would be certain death. What choice is there then?


2 posted on 12/18/2008 6:10:51 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I see that Kenya's favorite son has a new weekly Saturday morning radio show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Is there any common sense in CA?


3 posted on 12/18/2008 6:11:19 PM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It just reaffirms what I've always said: never help anyone for any reason, anytime.

Well, I've actually never said that, but maybe I'll start now.

4 posted on 12/18/2008 6:14:18 PM PST by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
There's no accounting for stupidity from the California Supremes. I consider it a moral obligation to save a human life and I won't be deterred from it by a lawsuit. Ever.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 12/18/2008 6:14:32 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

We’re becoming Mexico.


6 posted on 12/18/2008 6:15:10 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Democrats still want to get Pres. Bush and/or VP Cheney; there might be show trials in Feb09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

Probably not. There is just endless news of the stupidity that is coming from that place.


7 posted on 12/18/2008 6:15:15 PM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Justice Carlos Moreno wrote for a unanimous court that a person is not obligated to come to someone's aid.

Opening another can of stupid on an unsuspecting populace again I see. Eviscerating the concept of good samaritan protection of liability is going to lead to a lot of bystanders watching people be injured or die because they are afraid of being sued.

8 posted on 12/18/2008 6:15:24 PM PST by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

There are interpreting the law as written. It is up to the legislature to expand the Good Samaritan liability exception to include friends.


9 posted on 12/18/2008 6:18:01 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why, hell . . . the Great One and Most Merciful From On High won’t let a newborn baby get emergency health care either if momma wants the Junior dead, so no Good Samaritan need apply in the nursery either.

Hey, it’s the culture of death (except of course for the whales and dolphins and domestic pets, and etc.), but humans are not to be helped.

What a bunch of a$$holes!


10 posted on 12/18/2008 6:19:12 PM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

California is a very liberal state. They do not believe in the value of a human life. They only believe in selfishness and the right to comfort and easy living. That’s all you can expect in one of the most depraved cultures of the United States.

You’re right it shouldn’t matter if there is the risk of being sued. One saves a life for the sake of saving a life, not to receive payment.


11 posted on 12/18/2008 6:19:58 PM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

While the political left also accepts abortions and doesn’t accept the death penalty for any criminal reasons.


12 posted on 12/18/2008 6:21:47 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Can we start hunting lawyers with dogs yet?


13 posted on 12/18/2008 6:22:18 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

Kill the helpless unborn-good
Kill the helplessly ill-good
Stand there and watch somebody burn to death like an Eloi-Good
Execute a hard core killer-BAD you bigoted judgemental mouth breather.


14 posted on 12/18/2008 6:25:00 PM PST by omega4179 (Ramos and Compean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Justice Carlos Moreno wrote for a unanimous court that a person is not obligated to come to someone's aid.

Wow!
I bet Jerry, George, Elaine, and Kramer will be glad to hear about this!

15 posted on 12/18/2008 6:26:50 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nobama08
Is there any common sense in CA?

Oh man, what a line...

16 posted on 12/18/2008 6:27:38 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Seinfeld, Elaine, Cramer & George would beg to differ.

In some states it’s a crime to NOT help.


17 posted on 12/18/2008 6:27:46 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (Welcome to Obama's America... Be afraid, be very afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Ah, geesh! I just saw Lancey Howard’s post. You beat me to it.


18 posted on 12/18/2008 6:29:02 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (Welcome to Obama's America... Be afraid, be very afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

19 posted on 12/18/2008 6:30:15 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Geez........who you gonna believe?

From SFGate:

“Justice Carlos Moreno wrote for a unanimous court that a person is not obligated to come to someone’s aid.”

But, from the LA Times:

“The high court’s narrow definition of who qualifies for immunity when coming to the aid of an accident victim drew criticism within its own ranks, with three of the seven justices deeming the ruling “an arbitrary and unreasonable limitation” on protections for those trying to help.

Writing for the majority in the 4-3 ruling, Justice Carlos R. Moreno said the court’s primary duty was to determine the Legislature’s intent in immunizing from prosecution certain persons whose good Samaritan acts aggravate or inflict injury.”

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-good-samaritan19-2008dec19,0,4033454.story


20 posted on 12/18/2008 6:30:20 PM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson