No! I detest brainless rules-based approaches like this. It's almost like we don't want to single out Obama. Yes we do. Most Presidential candidates have established family histories in this country and producing documentation is unnecessary. Obama does NOT have established family history in this country which in of itself is a problem for someone wanting to become President of this great country. I can't believe they essentially elected a foreigner for this office.
That discounts his mother's family.
America will be guilty of car theft in essece if they buy into Obamas act based solely on a registration form and NO title. A fool and his money will go separate ways, America is being conned into buying a hyped up SUV or whatever and after they fork out the dough the seller is refusing to show the title.“No! I detest brainless rules-based approaches like this. It’s almost like we don’t want to single out Obama. Yes we do.”
Methinks perhaps you don’t understand the entire basis for this lawsuit. The president must be a natural born citizen, regardless of their family history. Holding people to different standards is unconstitutional in itself. Anyone who is to become president MUST be a natural born citizen, and should be prepared to provide proof of that. If your goal is to single out Obama, upholding the Consitution is nowhere near your real agenda, and you are undoubtedly contributing to the idea that this entire issue is just a partisan witch hunt. In other words, you’re doing more harm than good.
If America has to ask, he probably doesn't have one.