It’s in the blood: The effort to unseat Obama (Libtards in denial)

Scoop.NZ ^ | 12/5/08 | Binoy Kampmark

[pissant]

They just don’t give up, do they? Obama’s win, thumping, at least by American standards, is insufficient to placate those who question its legitimacy. Yes, so it went to a man who has a name of Hussein (ask Fox News, a network mesmerized by this one fact), and he might, in the elastic laws of ancestry (another Rupert special) be an Arab.

A keen skeptic of Obama’s status as the next president is one Alan Keyes, who missed out to the presidential-elect in the Illinois state race in 2004. In a legal suit he is currently entertaining, he hopes to halt the certification of votes in California. He is far from the other one. Another more pressing case is that of Leo Donofio against Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey’s Secretary of State. The U.S. Supreme Court will be considering the case on Friday to stay the election result.

The leitmotiv here seems to be this: blood is thicker than evidence. It all lies in the birth certificate, which the Obama campaign had previously posted on its campaign. Disprove its authenticity, and you derail the election. Keyes remains convinced that Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States. (Look at the father, he claims – he was Kenyan, after all.) When asked about his status, something which can be easily shown through a birth certificate showing U.S. birth or from parents with the means of transmitting it citizenship, Obama ‘danced around it.’

[pissant]

The libtards are coming out of the woodwork. Still waiting for one to actually understand the arguments against the marxist though.

[WayneS]

They (the lib-tards) certainly didn’t use this line of thinking after the 2000 election, did they?

[pissant]

I seem to remember a daily feeding frenzy over Bush’s Air Guard service records, which Bush released, BTW. And they did not even have anything to do with eligibility.

[Domandred]

Obama’s win, thumping, at least by American standards, is insufficient to placate those who question its legitimacy

I'm not sure anyone is questioning the win (unlike liberals questioning the Bush win in 2000). Sure there were ACORN issues, but even removing them I think Obama still won the vote.

We are questioning if Obama meets one of the qualifications of President listed in the Constitution. The Constitution only gives two qualifications, that's it. It's actually pretty silent on experience, character, gender, religion, economic status etc etc. Very simple qualifications to meet, yet Obama won't show that he meets one of them.

[tumblindice]

“2000 election”
Yep, Dubya was the `Commander-in-Thief’ and they never let up. So this issue is win-win: even if the Supremes go into helmet defilade, we can.
Anywho the author’s some sort of lefty limey anyway and a Cambridge grad, probably a cockknocker.

[cripplecreek]

The libtards are clearly confused. Just like during the election they don’t know the difference between reality and fantasy. They must be so proud.

Is it Sarah Palin or Tina Fey?

[GBA]

With so many challenges to Obama's eligibility, when even one is somewhat surprising, one might think we are not simply being political in requiring that the Constitutional requirements be met above board, in the light of day, to put this matter to rest. Instead, those who are demanding that the Constitution be followed are labeled as kooks and excessively partisan.

I personally am offended that Obama is forcing so many to spend who knows how much time and money on something he could end any time he chose to do so. His actions show a lack of character and a lack of respect for the Constitution and for the people he is to govern. He acts like someone hiding the truth as though he has something to fear if the truth were known.

[FrankR]

That’s one reason I don’t date liberal women...I show her mine but she won’t show me hers....

[Old Sarge]

For eight years, we’ve been told that Bush is:

- an alcoholic;
- illegitimate;
- stole the election;
- Hitler;
- BushHitler;
- BushCo;
- Shrub;
- a cocaine addict;
- a Nazi;
- a fascist;
- an idiot;
- an evil genius;
- a poor-person killer;
- a warmonger;
- a kicker of old ladies;
- a religious fanatic;
- a war criminal;
- Chimp;
- Chimpy McHitler;
- Chimpeached;

When The Left apologizes or is punished for eight years of slander, libel and sedition, THEN I’ll think about stopping personal attacks about The Obama, The Messiah, The One (piss be upon him).

[Logical me]

This is all in vain. Nothing, and I will repeat, nothing will stop this communists from taking office. It matters not what the Constitution says, we have been taken over by a machine that consumes so much of the power in America that if found out he is not a citizen it still will not be enforced. America is in more trouble than any time in history. Obama resources are like a gang machine and so powerful I think most Americans are dumbed down. America is in a financial weak place now and I feel most Americans are in a paralyzed state, afraid to move in any way, so will ride it out. Damn I hope I am wrong!!!!!!

[pissant]

We shall see.

[BP2]

Here's a very, scary scenario:

Obama moves on to be sworn in on Jan. 20, 2009. All the current efforts to prevent this are fruitless -- the "powers" of Washington collectively decided to give Obama a "pass." They do this because they feel calling him illegitimate, and ordering new elections, might cause a break down domestically and overseas.

A few months later, foreign intelligence agencies, either from our enemies or countries who profit from the downfall of the US, start leaking documents that we have been seeking for months now. Documents they've had all along. "Birth certificates," copies of Indonesian school records, travel manifests, passport records, etc, are released to the UN and other nations.

Domestically, it sets off a chain reaction in the US. Citizens call for a referendum, or demand resignation. "Red states," particularly those in the south, openly discuss seceding for political and economic reasons.

Financially, we sink even further in the world economy, with the stability of our government questioned. The US dollar is worthless and our diplomacy is ineffective because legitimacy of our government as a whole is very much in doubt. Our current allies offer no objection, fearing to lose what little international trading there is because of the world economic crisis.

Militarily, our soldiers are hesitant to act for fear that killing a foreign person might expose them, individually, to war crimes because they are considered to be under the command of an illegitimate head of state by many foreign powers.

Sound too crazy to happen? Really??!

Let's pray that are leaders and guided by wisdom in their decisions over the next several weeks. There's a lot at stake if they're wrong...

[MHGinTN]

Because the potential for blackmail is so real, if enemies have documents to prove Obama/Soetoro is not eligible, they would be able to extort the little bastard over issues like Pakistan/India, Plaestinian demand/Israel, Baltic pipelines, off-shore oil exploration. The potential is real and with a man who has shown he doesn’t give a damn about the domestic tranquility and has probably exhibited dividied loyalties, We The People are about to be screwed ... to death, or at least the death of OUR REPUBLIC and likely the death of a lot of innocent Americans too willfully blind to rejetc this affirmative action fraudster.

[joygrace]

BP2- I just wanted to say thank you for all your “pings.” That is what they are right? Your posts. I love the way you write and express yourself. I am relatively new to FR.

Have you seen this video? You have to watch it. The video is called,
Transparency: an open letter to Barack Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL08s5uH8as

In Obama’s own words, he talks about the imporatnce of beinig transparent!!!!!! I wish the lawyers could play this at the press conference this Monday.

He can talk the talk but he can’t walk the walk. What a complete fraud and coward. I am ashamed of him!!!

Thanks again.

JoyGrace or JG

[MHGinTN]

No, you don’t hope you’re wrong. You hope you can smamrily tell us all ‘I told you so’. Liar

[television is just wrong]

on the bright side, the stock market starts to rise again, because we no longer have a communist president elect.

[STARWISE]

Let’s pray that *our (are) leaders and guided by wisdom in their decisions over the next several weeks. There’s a lot at stake if they’re wrong...

~~~~

AND Lord, please bless and guide Mr. Donofrio, Justice Thomas and the Supreme Court Justices to rightous and just deliberation and conclusions the wellbeing of our beloved America.

###

I’m away from my home computer and ping lists and will be out all this evening.

Would one of you PLEASE start a prayer thread tonight for this consequential day tomorrow, December 5, 2008, at the Supreme Court.

I think it’s important that we virtually vigil with those will be at the Supreme Court at 8am tomorrow morning.

Thank you! And please ping me to it. Keep praying .. let there be final and just resolution of this issue for the sake of our country.

###

Update from Leo Donofrio today:

~~~

DEC 5TH VIGIL AT SCOTUS: PLEASE DONT BRING SIGNS - LEO DONOFRIO WILL NOT BE AT VIGIL

[UPDATE 5:00 PM] Leo Donofrio is not involved in the planning of this vigil. It just developed by its own momentum. I am not asking anybody to go and I have said it will have zero effect on the outcome.

But now that it appears to be happening, I am trying to make people understand there are dangers involved with such an event.

My advice below is just a guide for anybody planning on going, but I am not encouraging participation.

**I will be on the radio to dicsuss this - BRIEFLY- with Joe Thunder tonight at 9:00 PM EST, via the Plains Radio Network.**

http://www.plainsradio.com

LEO DONOFRIO WILL NOT BE AT THE VIGIL. PLEASE BRING NO SIGNS.

I do appreciate that people want to support the case, but please understand that nothing is going to influence the Supreme Court Justices.

I know people are planning on bringing signs regarding the misleading main stream media reports, but it’s not a good idea to bring any signs at all. Joe Thunder is also calling for a ban on all signs. Signs signify a protest. Make it a vigil - silent, dignified, all inclusive.

- Please don’t get roped into arguments.

- Please don’t bring megaphones.

- People who do not agree with my law suit should be welcomed and respected.

PLEASE DO EXACTLY AS THE SUPREME COURT POLICE INSTRUCT.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/dec-5-vigil-at-scotus-please-dont-bring-signs-leo-donofrio-will-not-be-at-vigil/

[BP2]

Yep.

If you ever get a Top Secret clearance, the government looks DEEP in your background, to see if you have any skeletons in the closet.

They check your criminal record, to see if you might have committed acts that show a pattern of deceit.

They check your credit, to see if you might be a target of bribery.

And they also check for other things, such as falsified records and marital infidelity -- to ensure you won't be blackmailed by the enemy to become their servant, or worse yet, their spy.

The problem is that people elected to office are NOT subject to such screening...

[Fred Nerks]

The problem is that people elected to office are NOT subject to such screening...

that's absolutely horrifying!

[penelopesire]

Excellent post!