Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India's PM accuses Pakistan and its highest levels of PakGovt.
Live From CNN International ^ | 11-28-2008 | CNN

Posted on 11/28/2008 5:54:54 AM PST by 82ndABNOfficer

India accusing Pakistan internal support, summons the head of the ISI Pakistani Intelligence Service.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blame; india; islam; jihad; mumbai; pakistan; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/28/2008 5:54:54 AM PST by 82ndABNOfficer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 82ndABNOfficer

World War I started for way, way less than this.


2 posted on 11/28/2008 6:00:45 AM PST by agere_contra (So ... where's the birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 82ndABNOfficer

When vicious acts of war, war crimes in fact, are launched from your territory, you bear responsibility. I don’t blame the Indians one bit.


3 posted on 11/28/2008 6:02:33 AM PST by EternalVigilance (AIPNEWS.com - America's Independent Party: "Peace through superior firepower!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 82ndABNOfficer

And the Head of ISI has agreed to come to India.

This is a sign of weakness on the Paki side!


4 posted on 11/28/2008 6:02:54 AM PST by BullDog108 (A Smith & Wesson beats four aces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Pakistan and al-Qaida has their fingerprints all over this. What better place to train terrorists than Pakistan? Also, where is bin Laden? If the fight moves to Pakistan is he now safe in Afganistan?


5 posted on 11/28/2008 6:02:56 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

bttt


6 posted on 11/28/2008 6:04:22 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (Cal Thomas.. just another has been with an opinion and an a$$hole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk
Also, where is bin Laden? If the fight moves to Pakistan is he now safe in Afganistan?

Safer in Chicago or San Francisco, probably.

7 posted on 11/28/2008 6:05:57 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (Do not read this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

No he won’t be safe, because our President Elect has said he’ll get him. Don’t you remember?


8 posted on 11/28/2008 6:09:02 AM PST by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

AQ wants to strike a war against Islam so they can unite all muslims under their banner. They failed on 9/11. Now they’re going after a target they feel is more likely to respond on a broad scale with support from U.S. and G.B., and for good measure they got Israel involved.


9 posted on 11/28/2008 6:10:28 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (Do not read this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid

Was that before or after he promised a flying unicorn in every garage?


10 posted on 11/28/2008 6:11:32 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (Do not read this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

If you twist a tiger’s tail, don’t act surprised when he eats you.


11 posted on 11/28/2008 6:13:14 AM PST by EternalVigilance (AIPNEWS.com - America's Independent Party: "Peace through superior firepower!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid
“No he won’t be safe, because our President Elect has said he’ll get him. Don’t you remember?”
>>>>>>>>>.................
OBL alive...LOL mince meat at tora bora..CIA has got a great tactic there for those who can understand the
cloak and dagger mind set.
12 posted on 11/28/2008 6:14:17 AM PST by shadowgovernment (From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid
No he won’t be safe, because our President Elect has said he’ll get him. Don’t you remember?

Oh I remember alright, but you have to understand the nuances of the term "get him". Does Osama want to "get him" on the Whitehouse team? Or does he want to "get him" his own country with nuclear weapons so that the world will have a level playing field? Just what did The Zer0 mean when he said "get him"? He is a trained lawyer remember.

13 posted on 11/28/2008 6:19:32 AM PST by fella (.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fella
He is a trained lawyer remember.

Remember that according to Barry O's own words, he's an affirmative action lawyer, so we know that in matters of grades and scholarship, he's on the shallow side of mainstream.
14 posted on 11/28/2008 6:22:10 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 82ndABNOfficer

Reuters reports 5 jewish hostages killed at the Nairman House including the rabbi and his wife. Their two-year old child was rescued yesterday.


15 posted on 11/28/2008 6:22:39 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella

Oh boy, you’re right, making “nuances” is what the left does best! *slapping forehead* :-) :-)


16 posted on 11/28/2008 6:28:56 AM PST by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Pakistan needs a change in religion. They need to get on their knees and accept Jesus Christ as their Savior. And I’d love to see an American President actually say that to them.


17 posted on 11/28/2008 7:24:40 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Any President saying that today would be castigated by the MSM and ACLU...congress would open impeachment hearings.

You can’t pubically believe in God today...it is politically incorrect. Homosexuals in SF are still surging in groups looking for Christians and Jews to attack...not that the media has much noticed.


18 posted on 11/28/2008 7:31:01 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kjo

The MSM and the ACLU would certainly be upset. But you wouldn’t see impeachment hearings. They still answer to voters. They would be afraid to touch it.


19 posted on 11/28/2008 7:40:58 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 82ndABNOfficer

bump.


20 posted on 11/28/2008 9:13:35 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson