Four Klamath River Dams May Be Removed to Benefit Salmon

Environment News Service ^ | November 19, 2008

[calcowgirl]

NEVADA CITY, California, November 19, 2008 (ENS) - Four dams on the Klamath River that have blocked salmon runs upstream to their spawning areas may be removed in the year 2020 under an historic agreement among federal, state and corporate parties.

Dam removal will re-open over 300 miles of habitat for the Klamath's salmon and steelhead populations and eliminate water quality problems such as toxic algae blooms caused by the reservoirs.

The federal government, the state of California, the state of Oregon and the PacifiCorp electric utility Thursday announced an Agreement in Principle to remove the four dams as part of a broader effort to restore the river and revive its ailing salmon and steelhead runs and aid fishing, tribal and farming communities.

The agreement is intended to guide the development of a final settlement agreement scheduled to be signed in June 2009.

"This is a historic announcement and the culmination of years of hard work from the numerous negotiators from the federal government and the states of California and Oregon, and PacifiCorp representatives who have worked toward a common goal of how best to protect the uniqueness of this region," said Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne.

"We have agreed to a path forward that will protect fish, PacifiCorp customers and the local cultures and communities in the two-state Klamath River basin," Kempthorne said.

The United States will make a final determination by March 31, 2012, whether the benefits of dam removal will justify the costs, informed by scientific and engineering studies conducted in the interim, and in consultation with state, local, and tribal governments and other stakeholders.

At that point, the United States shall designate a non-federal dam removal entity to remove the dams or decline to remove the dams.

Rebecca Wodder, president of the nonprofit American Rivers who for years has urged removal of the dams, said, "We have not popped the champagne cork yet, but we have put a bottle on ice. The initial agreement is a huge step toward a healthy Klamath River Basin. American Rivers looks forward to working out remaining details in the final negotiations."

"This will be the world's biggest dam removal project. But ultimately, this isn't about tearing down dams. It is about restoring one of the most important rivers on the west coast, boosting local economies, and revitalizing fishing, tribal and farming communities."

The Klamath River was once the third most productive salmon river system in the United States. Today, due to the dams, poor water quality and too little water left in the river, the Klamath salmon runs have are less than 10 percent of their historic size. Some species, such as coho salmon, are now in such low numbers in the Klamath River that they are listed under the federal Endangered Species Act.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger called the agreement "the largest dam removal project ever in history that California, Oregon and our federal and private partners are undertaking to improve water quality, water supply and fish populations in the Klamath region."

"The health of the Klamath River is critical to the livelihood of numerous Northern California communities, and with this groundbreaking agreement we have established a framework for restoring an important natural resource for future generations," he said.

Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski said, "While many months of work lay ahead, this historic agreement provides a path forward to achieve the largest river and salmon restoration effort ever undertaken in a way that's good for fish, PacifiCorp customers, and local communities and our sovereign tribes."

The Klamath Tribes, along with the Karuk and Yurok tribes of California have for years sought removal of the dams.

"With Oregon's best interests in mind, it is with great pride that I will be taking the first step in implementing this agreement by offering legislation to support the dam decommissioning and removal process," Kulongoski said.

Assuming a final agreement is reached next year and pending congressional approval, PacifiCorp will set aside millions of dollars for immediate environmental improvements. The funds would be used to implement numerous measures that will enhance habitat, improve water quality, increase fish populations, and benefit fisheries management in the basin.

"This careful effort to balance the complex needs of numerous interests within the community is exactly the type of approach PacifiCorp takes every time we sit down to the settlement table," said Greg Abel, PacifiCorp chairman and chief executive.

"This flexible framework ensures that our customers will be protected at every step along the way, while remaining consistent with our strong commitment to respecting the environment. We will continue to work diligently with everyone at the table, including the irrigators, environmentalists, the tribes and all local elected officials with the goal of reaching a final dam removal agreement that is in the economic interests of PacifiCorp customers."

Wodder says PacifiCorp's four dams produce only a nominal amount of power, which can be replaced using renewables and efficiency measures, without contributing to global warming.

A study by the California Energy Commission and the Department of the Interior found that removing the dams and replacing their power would save PacifiCorp customers up to $285 million over 30 years.

PacifiCorp agrees to contribute as much as $200 million to cover the cost of removing its four dams and restoring the river. Dam removal funds would be obtained from ratepayers in Oregon and California before removal begins. The impact to customer bills will be less than one percent.

If the costs of dam removal exceed PacifiCorp's contribution, California and Oregon together would contribute up to $250 million. Current estimates of dam removal costs range between $75 million and $200 million.

[calcowgirl]

klamath ping

[prisoner6]

Thanks for the ping!

prisoner6

[Oratam]

How will this effect Bigfoot?

[DoughtyOne]

Let me guess... we are going to remove electric generation plants with nothing to replace the power loss right?

If so, this is essentially one leftist action that is going to defeat other leftist actions. We want to get off foreign oil. We want to go clean energy production. And now we’re poised to destroy clean energy production.

If this is a good idea, why not remove Hover dam too? I mean let’s get back to nature folks.

[Buchal]

What a pack of lies.

[ByteMercenary]

“PacifiCorp agrees to contribute as much as $200 million to cover the cost of removing its four dams and restoring the river. ... The impact to customer bills will be less than one percent.”

Slightly off topic but this quote or one like it shows up daily in the media to wit: an expense to a company shows up in the price to the consumer. And yet the average Leftist continues to scream that taxing business is the way to Nirvana. Why is it so hard for these people to understand that taxing business does not (necessarily) reduce profits but it certainly does increase prices.

[BallyBill]

They removed most of the old dams on the Schuylkill River around me. Most served no useful purpose anymore and now boaters and canoeist aren't impeded by them. The Shad will come back too.

Ironic because most of them had been built for recreational purposes over a century ago before water parks and home swimming pools.

[Robert Drobot]

Please notch me into your ping list. I did a thousand mile trek to be a part of the Klamath Basin ‘Bucket Brigade’. In fact, I met and marched along side and passed water buckets - with AuntB, and other rock solid patriots - from one waterway to another dried up waterway that was shut down by the government - intentionally denying critical crop irrigation PROMISED to family farmers - purposly throwing those families out of business and into bankruptcy!!!

Another example of government for the rich and by the rich.

Now that we've elected the bastards into office for another two years, they're telling us the tax money they're doling out to the rich isn't our money !!!

Where's Thomas Jefferson when we really need him !!!

"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
Thomas Jefferson, at http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.html

[DeLaine]

2020. Is that a joke? Hmmm, let’s see, by 2020 all the farms will have failed, they hope.

[panaxanax]

It will devastate the remaining Bigfoot population. They do most of their fishing just below the dams where the Salmon are waiting in line to enter the multi-million dollar fish ladders. Bigfoot, I fear, will be doomed forever.

The real reason that the Salmon are declining is that the local Indian tribes are allowed to use gill nets at the mouth of the river. They claim it as an ‘ancestral right’ to harvest the Salmon as the forefathers did. The problem is that they do not use the same method of weaving tree roots etc. together to make nets then swim across the river dragging the heavy net risking being drowned in the rapid current. The new method is to back up their new 4WD to the river's edge and shoot a rocket-propelled net to the other side, sit down and have some beers and winch the net in at the end of the day. Then off to market, sell your take and go to McDonalds and stop for more beers. Few Salmon escape this high-tech manner of “fishing”, therefore fewer make it to their spawning areas.

[Grampa Dave]

Besides the obvious, these enviral fish idiots will be going Duh when we have a drought year like this past one.

Then, the Klamath will be a dusty highway during the no rain summer and fall.

Any smolts and a half pounders will be dead if they are still in the river system.

Of course if the river is dry, no Salmon or Steelhead will be able to come up the Klamath until we have some heavy rains in the fall or winter.

Without the dams holding the previous winter run off, there will be basically no water flowing down the Klamath during dry years.

Then the overweight salmon killing seals will have to go on welfare and salmon food stamps to keep from starving.

Of course the dam removal has nothing to do with protecting the salmon/steelhead.

The Green enviro whackos want to get rid of every rancher/farmer and professional guide/fisher downstream from the Klamath Lake to the Pacific Ocean.

The Spotted Owl BS got rid of the loggers and lumber people.

Now the Salmon BS will eliminate the farmers/ranchers and small communities down stream from Klamath Lake to the Pacific.

[Lion Den Dan]

Some have mentioned the disaster this portends for agriculture and the loss of electric production but it goes much farther. The loss of shoreline will destroy what tourist industry exists and will create an environment of waste land and noxious weeds in the exposed lake bottoms.

I believe that our Founding Fathers failed when they allowed so many Tories to escape. From those roots come our modern destroyer leftists.

[thackney]

removing the dams and replacing their power

I wonder if they calculated how much pollution would be generated by replacing this clean and reliable power source?

[tubebender]

There's more Bull Crap in this story than 50 square miles of Feed Lots... In 40 years South California will have a dam across the Klamath every 10 miles right down to the ocean to export the water for their golf courses and swimming pools...

[Jeff Head]

Dam fools. (pun and spelling intended)

Although this does not effect the dam in Klamath where we fought our battle in 2001, this is a very bad deal and a very bad precedent.

They are taking clean, direct energy production out of the system with a whimsical promise that it will be replaced by "something" clean and efficient...but no direct info or plan to do so.

Fact is, the enviro nazis care less about US dependence on oil. They, their NGO patrners (who are tied at the hip to the United Nations), their liberal politician and judge enablers, and a (once again complicit MSM) want to see the US dependent and paying more for energy because, like the Obamanation stated...they believe that the rest of thw world will not put up with it and it fits their marxist agendas.

They have been talking of doing this same thing on the Snake River for years and this will embolden them to press all the harder for it.

Their "study" is more junk science like the one that called for the preservation of non-threatened (by any common sense and local knowledge standpoint) sucker fish in the Klamath Reservoir in 2001.

The book is available as a complete, professional Adobe PDF download, FREE to all Freepers AT THE LINK HERE

[AuntB]

Jeff, just yesterday, they breached several of the levees of Klamath Lake. Blew them sky high. A ‘nature conservancy’ project.

Herald and News: Klamath Falls, Oregon > Front
Klamath Falls, Oregon Herald and News, newspaper online. ... Levees breached to help fish. Project will re-establish wetlands on the Williamson River Delta ...
www.heraldandnews.com/

[AuntB]

“Let me guess... we are going to remove electric generation plants with nothing to replace the power loss right?”

You got it!

The madness continues.

[AuntB]

See post 17

[TenthAmendmentChampion]

But ultimately, this isn't about tearing down dams.

Yes it is, you liar.

[Issaquahking]

Just another knife in the back of those who support America, and actually do something to make America free....Socialists marching to crush freedom.

[calcowgirl]

Please notch me into your ping list.

Done!

[marsh2]

There are two agreements (1) the Klamath Restoration Agreement and (2) the Agreement in Principle to remove the dams. Both really screw the people of Siskiyou County at or below the dams. We were the sacrificial lamb in a deal with the devil that the Klamath Project Farmers made with the tribes.

Here is a link to information about the Restoration Agreement: http://www.klamathbasincrisis.org/Poweranddamstoc/nodams/toc.htm
Here is a link to the initial report from the County’s consultant concerning the adequacy and credibility of the science supporting dam removal and how it could pose harm to public health, safety and the environment: http://www.klamathbucketbrigade.org/Brownfield_PreliminaryReviewofKlamathRiverDamandSedimentInvestigation071308.htm and http://www.klamathbucketbrigade.org/SiskiyouCounty_TestimonyofMinerandLambie071308.htm and http://www.klamathbucketbrigade.org/SiskiyouCounty_AddendumTestimonyofLambie071308.htm
Here is my initial cost/benefit analysis http://users.sisqtel.net/armstrng/Cost%20Benefit%20dam%20removal.htm and http://users.sisqtel.net/armstrng/Cost%20Benefit%20settlement%20agreement.htm The Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors unanimously opposed the Restoration Agreement.

The official statement of the Board on the AIP is:

The County of Siskiyou wishes to express its concern with the recent Agreement in Principle (AlP) issued with respect to removing the Irongate Dam, the Copco 1 Dam, the Copco 2 Dam, and the J. C. Boyle Dam, and other works presently licensed to PacifiCorp.

While the County of Siskiyou is appreciative of the parties permitting the County to participate in the discussions, the Agreement that has been undertaken by the parties still leaves significant issues unaddressed, not the least of which is the fact that it does not clearly address the cost and impacts to the County of Siskiyou and its constituents, nor does it provide sufficient provisions for determining such impacts. Unanswered by the Agreement in Principle (AlP) are the specific studies that will be undertaken, the degree to which local entities such as Siskiyou County will be permitted to participate, and provisions which essentially allow PacifiCorp and other parties to avoid any liability arising from its ownership and operation of the facilities. Unexplained is the scope of liability for the Dam Removal Entity (ORE) envisioned by the Agreement. In fact, no local input is provided for with respect to who is going to remove these dams which have been such an essential and integral part of Siskiyou County for many years.

Siskiyou County does acknowledge that, under the Miscellaneous Provisions of the Agreement in Principle (AlP), it does state that the Final Agreement “may” address the economic impact of the facilities removal on Siskiyou County and “may” address the issues regarding the City of Yreka’s water supply, as well as other terms. However, these terms are not mandatorily required. The Board of Supervisors opposes the AIP and the process described therein. The County of Siskiyou is of the opinion that those matters addressed in its Resolution in April, 2008, opposing a Sense of Congress Resolution requiring dam removal remain unanswered and that the removal of the dams will be a crippling blow to the County of Siskiyou. The County remains opposed to the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement. The Board of Supervisors directs County Counsel to issue Requests for Qualifications for special counsel to assist County Counsel as part of the Board’s intention to assemble a team to oppose the removal of the dams.

My own personal concerns include: (1) Siskiyou County has long requested in vain that, should the dams be removed, provisions be made to restore the lands behind the dams, mitigations be guaranteed for damage to road and other infrastructure, and that the County receive financial offsets for its substantial loss in tax revenue, impacts to local landowners and economy; (2) The issue of blanket waivers of liability for dam removal leaves landowners and others without recourse for damage to health, property, business and fish and wildlife habitat; (3) There is no certainty in the AIP for protection of the City of Yreka’s water supply; (4) There is no guarantee of the necessary currently non-existent studies that need to be done to determine benefits to fish, probable sediment transport behavior and potential negative impacts on human health, property, business, the economy of Siskiyou County and fish and wildlife habitat; (5) There is no certainty that alternatives such as a fish bypass will be given consideration; (6) The AIP appears to embrace the Klamath Restoration Agreement. There is no change in the unacceptable provisions concerning a fisheries restoration plan to be written by the tribes and agencies and the imposition of a river-wide “governance structure” that has inadequate and unequal representation of mid-Klamath stakeholders. These stakeholders, such as Copco landowners, and the Scott and Shasta Valley famers/ ranchers, were not a part of negotiations under that Agreement but would be subject to it.

This is probably the only place you will ever hear that there is another side to the feel good kumbaya stories the tribes, environmentalists and Klamath Basin farmers send out. None of the reporters ever ask the people here who are directly affected.

[calcowgirl]

Sense of Congress Resolution requiring dam removal ...

Do you know if dam removal (and hydroelectric) is widespread across the country? I'm trying to understand what the primary motivator is. Land development? To make alternative energy relatively less expensive by shutting off supply and driving up the cost of everything else? To drive the country folk into the city? It's just mind boggling to think there are so many that are complicit in the actions.

[Carry_Okie]

I'm trying to understand what the primary motivator is.

The oil and gas industry is constraining you to oil and gas while punishing you for using it. They want to make more on less.

[calcowgirl]

Well, that’s short and to the point, as usual. :-)

Which brings me back to my original statement:
“It’s just mind boggling to think there are so many that are complicit in the actions.”

[SierraWasp]

They, want us powerless, broke and with nothing to pound but sand!!!

America is an evil "resource extractor," haven't you heard?

The fish come first, even though the Clinton campaigns all said they were "putting people first!" Now the first black Bill Clinton is overstocking his Denkins like administration with Clinton comrades!!!

They can't lead! They can't follow! They won't get out of the way! All they want is the destruction of the traditional American culture to make all nations equal!!!

GovernMental EnvironMentalism is the most crisis based method for doing just that!!!

[SierraWasp]

"The madness continues."

True, while rising in intensity based on terminal stupidity!!!

[marsh2]

The salmon devotees believe that the west coast dams block the migration of salmon and cut off hundreds of miles of spawning habitat. They believe that if all the dams are removed that the salmon populations will return to pre-European times. They refuse to recognize the part that the Pacific decadal ocillation in the ocean is playing, the role of tribal nets stretch across the mouths of rivers, the protection of marine mammals and over-fishing plays.