[Coyoteman]

The point is that the Evos predicted and labeled ERs to be functionless “junk DNA,” whereas the Creation and ID scientists predicted they would prove to be functional. And as it turns out, they are not only proving to be functional, but have now been shown to be part of an extremely sophisticated regulatory network that is indispensable for cellular function and organismal survival.

And this, even if it were entirely accurate, proves the Christian deity exactly as portrayed in scriptures, right?

Get a grip.

[GoLightly]

And this, even if it were entirely accurate, proves the Christian deity exactly as portrayed in scriptures, right?

Strawman. It goes to the claim that those coming from the ID side of things can't make useful predictions.

[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

And this, even if it were entirely accurate, proves the Christian deity exactly as portrayed in scriptures, right?

Get a grip.

You need to get a grip, because your post was completely non-sequitur nonsense. Nobody has claimed that an empirical observation which positively substantiates creationist/ID hypotheses and refutes evolutionist hypotheses proves an unempirical claim. Nobody on this thread even made said unempirical claim. Nevertheless, the facts in this case positively point to the unempirical claim being more likely than the likewise unempirical claim of naturalistic materialism.