Get a grip.
You need to get a grip, because your post was completely non-sequitur nonsense. Nobody has claimed that an empirical observation which positively substantiates creationist/ID hypotheses and refutes evolutionist hypotheses proves an unempirical claim. Nobody on this thread even made said unempirical claim. Nevertheless, the facts in this case positively point to the unempirical claim being more likely than the likewise unempirical claim of naturalistic materialism.
"We think these things will prove to have some function" isn't really much of a hypothesis--it's about as impressive as "they're there because something put them there sometime, somewhere, somehow." Did any creationist/ID'er actually propose a function they might have and a test that could reveal that function? Or did they just sit back and wait for evolutionary scientists to learn something so they could point to it and say "We knew it all along"?