I think I’m going to get a little fish and put it in a fish tank putting the food just out of reach to prove that fish don’t grow legs.
(I hope other people watch My Name is Earl because that was FUNNY that Joy put a tadpole in the tank and it ended up growing legs because it turned into a frog.)
I won’t be able to respond for a day or two...I’m on a road trip :o)
All the best—GGG
The Activism sidebar is reserved for News/Activism of the FR chapters.
Not this.
I don’t it is fair to cite gaps in the current understanding of life as proof of ID.
I don’t think it is fair for anti-ID folks to reject out of hand criticisms of current theory from ANY source.
Just another point of data that the Free Republic Hardcore evolutionists have an underlying bitterness against a God who actually "Designed" and "Created" anything.
It is very obvious to anyone who has read their vitriol for years. Their real purpose is humanistic, liberal politics under carefully veneered layers of dogmatism.
Endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights....?
Not so according to the fanatical, dogmatic Free Republic Evolutionists. They think our rights come from government and liberal judges are the final authority on truth.
I’m having a hard time finding someplace where an evolutionary scientist said that ERVs and “junk DNA” would never be found to have a function. In fact, most scientists I find that discuss the issue say that organisms seem to have co-opted the ERV insertions and used them for their own purposes. Can you support, with sources, the assertion that “endogenous retroviruses have been found to have functions...invalidates the ‘random retrovirus insertion’ claim”?